archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ralph Campbell <>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <>
Cc: <>, <>,
	<>, <>,
	Jerome Glisse <>,
	"John Hubbard" <>,
	Christoph Hellwig <>, Ben Skeggs <>,
	Andrew Morton <>,
	Shuah Khan <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] nouveau/hmm: add support for mapping large pages
Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 10:32:48 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

On 5/25/20 6:41 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 12:20:03PM -0700, Ralph Campbell wrote:
>> hmm_range_fault() returns an array of page frame numbers and flags for
>> how the pages are mapped in the requested process' page tables. The PFN
>> can be used to get the struct page with hmm_pfn_to_page() and the page size
>> order can be determined with compound_order(page) but if the page is larger
>> than order 0 (PAGE_SIZE), there is no indication that the page is mapped
>> using a larger page size. To be fully general, hmm_range_fault() would need
>> to return the mapping size to handle cases like a 1GB compound page being
>> mapped with 2MB PMD entries. However, the most common case is the mapping
>> size the same as the underlying compound page size.
>> This series adds a new output flag to indicate this so that callers know it
>> is safe to use a large device page table mapping if one is available.
>> Nouveau and the HMM tests are updated to use the new flag.
>> Note that this series depends on a patch queued in Ben Skeggs' nouveau
>> tree ("nouveau/hmm: map pages after migration") and the patches queued
>> in Jason's HMM tree.
>> There is also a patch outstanding ("nouveau/hmm: fix nouveau_dmem_chunk
>> allocations") that is independent of the above and could be applied
>> before or after.
> Did Christoph and Matt's remarks get addressed here?

Both questioned the need to add the HMM_PFN_COMPOUND flag to the
hmm_range_fault() output array saying that the PFN can be used to get the
struct page pointer and the page can be examined to determine the page size.
My response is that while is true, it is also important that the device only
access the same parts of a large page that the process/cpu has access to.
There are places where a large page is mapped with smaller page table entries
when a page is shared by multiple processes.
After I explained this, I haven't seen any further comments from Christoph
and Matt. I'm still looking for reviews, acks, or suggested changes.

> I think ODP could use something like this, currently it checks every
> page to get back to the huge page size and this flag would optimze
> that
> Jason

  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-26 17:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-08 19:20 [PATCH 0/6] nouveau/hmm: add support for mapping large pages Ralph Campbell
2020-05-08 19:20 ` [PATCH 1/6] nouveau/hmm: map pages after migration Ralph Campbell
2020-05-08 19:20 ` [PATCH 2/6] nouveau: make nvkm_vmm_ctor() and nvkm_mmu_ptp_get() static Ralph Campbell
2020-05-08 19:20 ` [PATCH 3/6] nouveau/hmm: fault one page at a time Ralph Campbell
2020-05-08 19:20 ` [PATCH 4/6] mm/hmm: add output flag for compound page mapping Ralph Campbell
2020-05-08 19:51   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-08 20:06     ` Ralph Campbell
2020-05-26 22:29       ` Zi Yan
2020-05-26 22:47         ` Ralph Campbell
2020-05-08 19:20 ` [PATCH 5/6] nouveau/hmm: support mapping large sysmem pages Ralph Campbell
2020-05-08 19:20 ` [PATCH 6/6] hmm: add tests for HMM_PFN_COMPOUND flag Ralph Campbell
2020-05-08 19:59 ` [PATCH 0/6] nouveau/hmm: add support for mapping large pages Matthew Wilcox
2020-05-08 20:17   ` Ralph Campbell
2020-05-09  3:17     ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-05-11 17:07       ` Ralph Campbell
2020-05-25 13:41 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-05-26 17:32   ` Ralph Campbell [this message]
2020-05-29 23:24     ` Jason Gunthorpe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).