From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF4ACC47082 for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 18:14:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8907461380 for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 18:14:31 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 8907461380 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id DE11D6B006C; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 14:14:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id DB85F6B006E; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 14:14:30 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id C80FA6B0070; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 14:14:30 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0136.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.136]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A4106B006C for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 14:14:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin25.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A241181AEF0B for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 18:14:30 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 78231356700.25.E2DD621 Received: from so254-9.mailgun.net (so254-9.mailgun.net [198.61.254.9]) by imf21.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D993BE00026C for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 18:14:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; v=1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mg.codeaurora.org; q=dns/txt; s=smtp; t=1623176069; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: Date: Message-ID: From: References: Cc: To: Subject: Sender; bh=uWW165KYtF6OMErIoL2BZOio5ksvsQKwSkI21Cp3Uqo=; b=OhRIWM5/kyESy0BwB5gNrMobvmp4bBmQNtvRDFLfsmF1uMM3Nnyh5FaGFm8NcX+p6/ppaGP2 wbQQr3NRoS1z6ulBSkJVa5UnFzDMk5DmcKQR572vhJFLTpqV99jFG57tOqW0X0uPACI1LYD6 9D6WKOyXHPwbJJSjHYmdtxmtk4Y= X-Mailgun-Sending-Ip: 198.61.254.9 X-Mailgun-Sid: WyIwY2Q3OCIsICJsaW51eC1tbUBrdmFjay5vcmciLCAiYmU5ZTRhIl0= Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org (ec2-35-166-182-171.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [35.166.182.171]) by smtp-out-n04.prod.us-east-1.postgun.com with SMTP id 60bfb356e27c0cc77feed826 (version=TLS1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256); Tue, 08 Jun 2021 18:13:42 GMT Received: by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 8D32FC4360C; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 18:13:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.105] (unknown [49.204.182.221]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: faiyazm) by smtp.codeaurora.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3680CC4338A; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 18:13:36 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 smtp.codeaurora.org 3680CC4338A Subject: Re: [PATCH v11] mm: slub: move sysfs slab alloc/free interfaces to debugfs To: Vlastimil Babka , Andy Shevchenko Cc: Christoph Lameter , Pekka Enberg , David Rientjes , Joonsoo Kim , Andrew Morton , linux-mm , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Greg KH , glittao@gmail.com, vinmenon@codeaurora.org References: <1623141934-7699-1-git-send-email-faiyazm@codeaurora.org> <78fc8848-bde8-769e-f8e9-6157d232a60f@suse.cz> From: Faiyaz Mohammed Message-ID: <47842d8d-2747-3d0f-8695-122dc23d90e6@codeaurora.org> Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2021 23:43:34 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <78fc8848-bde8-769e-f8e9-6157d232a60f@suse.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Server: rspam05 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: D993BE00026C X-Stat-Signature: jhr6sd68mz8saorkfdwfzwtswzximcrh Authentication-Results: imf21.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=mg.codeaurora.org header.s=smtp header.b="OhRIWM5/"; dmarc=none; spf=pass (imf21.hostedemail.com: domain of bounce@mg.codeaurora.org designates 198.61.254.9 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=bounce@mg.codeaurora.org X-HE-Tag: 1623176060-407087 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On 6/8/2021 11:05 PM, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > On 6/8/21 7:11 PM, Faiyaz Mohammed wrote: >> >> >> On 6/8/2021 5:20 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >>> On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 11:45 AM Faiyaz Mohammed wrote: >>>> >>>> alloc_calls and free_calls implementation in sysfs have two issues, >>>> one is PAGE_SIZE limitation of sysfs and other is it does not adhere >>>> to "one value per file" rule. >>>> >>>> To overcome this issues, move the alloc_calls and free_calls >>>> implementation to debugfs. >>>> >>>> Debugfs cache will be created if SLAB_STORE_USER flag is set. >>>> >>>> Rename the alloc_calls/free_calls to alloc_traces/free_traces, >>>> to be inline with what it does. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Faiyaz Mohammed >>>> --- >>> >>> It seems you missed the version bump along with changelog. >>> Note, some maintainers (actually quite many I think) are using tools >>> to fetch up the patches and two patches with the same version is a >>> problem. Hence I do not consider it a nit-pick. >>> >> Hmmm, I think to avoid same version problem I have to push same patch >> with new version number and thank you for your patience. > > I *think* Andrew wouldn't have this issue, so maybe resend only if he says it's > needed. Sure, I will send if he ask. > On the other hand I did have troubles to apply the last version locally, patch > (tool) complained of patch (file) being malformed at the end. Did you add or > delete lines from it after generating the patch? I had to use the recountdiff Yes, I added one line manually, I think that causes the issue. > tool to fix this. If you're going to resend, please make sure it's without the > same issue. > Okay >> Thanks and regards, >> Mohammed Faiyaz >> >