From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail143.messagelabs.com (mail143.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.35]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50C0E5F0001 for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2009 03:44:59 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <49E43F1D.3070400@kernel.org> Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 16:45:33 +0900 From: Tejun Heo MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/9] File descriptor hot-unplug support References: <49E4000E.10308@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org To: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Al Viro , Hugh Dickins , Alexey Dobriyan , Linus Torvalds , Alan Cox , Greg Kroah-Hartman List-ID: Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Do you know of a case where we actually have multiple tasks accessing > a file simultaneously? I don't have anything at hand but multithread/process server accepting on the same socket comes to mind. I don't think it would be a very rare thing. If you confine the scope to character devices or sysfs, it could be quite rare tho. > I just instrumented up my patch an so far the only case I have found > are multiple processes closing the same file. Some weird part of > bash forking extra processes. Hmmm... Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org