From: David Hildenbrand <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: Oscar Salvador <email@example.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <firstname.lastname@example.org>,
Mike Kravetz <email@example.com>,
Muchun Song <firstname.lastname@example.org>,
Michal Hocko <email@example.com>,
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] mm: Make alloc_contig_range handle free hugetlb pages
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2021 11:32:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <firstname.lastname@example.org> (raw)
>> I think we should not swallo such return values in
>> isolate_or_dissolve_huge_page() and instead properly report esp. -ENOMEM
>> properly up this callchain now. Otherwise we'll end up retrying / reporting
>> -EBUSY, which is misleading.
> I am not sure I follow you here.
> So, atm, alloc_and_dissolve_huge_page can either generate -ENOMEM or
> -EBUSY wrt. error codes.
> -ENOMEM when we cannot allocate a page, and -EBUSY when we raced with
> You mean to only report ENOMEM down the chain?
Yes, fatal errors.
>> From isolate_migratepages_range()/isolate_migratepages_block() we'll keep
>> reporting "pfn > 0".
>> a) In isolate_migratepages_range() we'll keep iterating over pageblocks
>> although we should just fail with -ENOMEM right away.
>> b) In __alloc_contig_migrate_range() we'll keep retrying up to 5 times
>> although we should just fail with -ENOMEM. We end up returning "-EBUSY"
>> after retrying.
>> c) In alloc_contig_range() we'll continue trying to isolate although we
>> should just return -ENOMEM.
> Yes, "fatal" errors get masked, and hence we treat everything as "things
> are busy, let us try again", and this is rather unforunate.
>> I think we have should start returning proper errors from
>> isolate_migratepages_range()/isolate_migratepages_block() on critical issues
>> (-EINTR, -ENOMEM) instead of going via "!pfn vs. pfn" and retrying on "pfn".
>> So we should then fail with -ENOMEM during isolate_migratepages_range()
>> cleanly, just as we would do when we get -ENOMEM during migrate_pages().
> I guess we could rework the interface and make isolate_migratepages_range and
> isolate_migratepages_block to report the right thing.
> I yet have to check that this does not mess up a lot with the compaction
> But overall I agree with your point here, and I am willing to to tackle
> The question is whether we want to do this as part of this series, or
> after this series gets picked up.
> IMHO, we could do it after, as a follow-up, unless you feel strong about
> What do you think?
I think this is now the second fatal error we can have (-EINTR,
-ENOMEM), thus the current interface (return "NULL" on fatal errros) no
longer works properly.
No strong opinion about fixing this up on top - could be it's cleaner to
just do it right away.
David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-04 10:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-22 13:51 [PATCH v3 0/2] Make alloc_contig_range handle Hugetlb pages Oscar Salvador
2021-02-22 13:51 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] mm: Make alloc_contig_range handle free hugetlb pages Oscar Salvador
2021-02-25 20:03 ` Mike Kravetz
2021-02-26 9:48 ` Oscar Salvador
2021-02-26 8:35 ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-26 8:38 ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-26 9:25 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-02-26 9:47 ` Oscar Salvador
2021-02-26 9:45 ` Oscar Salvador
2021-02-26 9:51 ` Michal Hocko
2021-03-01 14:09 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-03-04 10:19 ` Oscar Salvador
2021-03-04 10:32 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2021-03-04 10:41 ` Oscar Salvador
2021-02-22 13:51 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] mm: Make alloc_contig_range handle in-use " Oscar Salvador
2021-02-25 23:05 ` Mike Kravetz
2021-02-26 8:46 ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-26 10:24 ` Oscar Salvador
2021-02-26 10:27 ` Oscar Salvador
2021-02-26 12:46 ` Michal Hocko
2021-02-28 13:43 ` Oscar Salvador
2021-03-05 17:30 ` David Hildenbrand
2021-03-01 12:43 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] Make alloc_contig_range handle Hugetlb pages David Hildenbrand
2021-03-01 12:57 ` Oscar Salvador
2021-03-01 12:59 ` David Hildenbrand
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).