From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
Pavel Tatashin <pavel.tatashin@microsoft.com>,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com>,
Anthony Yznaga <anthony.yznaga@oracle.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com>, Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>, Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
Yang Shi <yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v3 6/9] mm: Allow to offline PageOffline() pages with a reference count of 0
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 15:59:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50ee63c0-9d0b-0479-a5b9-494e4bc00446@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191016134519.GC317@dhcp22.suse.cz>
On 16.10.19 15:45, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 16-10-19 14:50:30, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 16.10.19 13:43, Michal Hocko wrote:
>>> On Thu 19-09-19 16:22:25, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>>> virtio-mem wants to allow to offline memory blocks of which some parts
>>>> were unplugged, especially, to later offline and remove completely
>>>> unplugged memory blocks. The important part is that PageOffline() has
>>>> to remain set until the section is offline, so these pages will never
>>>> get accessed (e.g., when dumping). The pages should not be handed
>>>> back to the buddy (which would require clearing PageOffline() and
>>>> result in issues if offlining fails and the pages are suddenly in the
>>>> buddy).
>>>>
>>>> Let's use "PageOffline() + reference count = 0" as a sign to
>>>> memory offlining code that these pages can simply be skipped when
>>>> offlining, similar to free or HWPoison pages.
>>>>
>>>> Pass flags to test_pages_isolated(), similar as already done for
>>>> has_unmovable_pages(). Use a new flag to indicate the
>>>> requirement of memory offlining to skip over these special pages.
>>>>
>>>> In has_unmovable_pages(), make sure the pages won't be detected as
>>>> movable. This is not strictly necessary, however makes e.g.,
>>>> alloc_contig_range() stop early, trying to isolate such page blocks -
>>>> compared to failing later when testing if all pages were isolated.
>>>>
>>>> Also, make sure that when a reference to a PageOffline() page is
>>>> dropped, that the page will not be returned to the buddy.
>>>>
>>>> memory devices (like virtio-mem) that want to make use of this
>>>> functionality have to make sure to synchronize against memory offlining,
>>>> using the memory hotplug notifier.
>>>>
>>>> Alternative: Allow to offline with a reference count of 1
>>>> and use some other sign in the struct page that offlining is permitted.
>>>
>>> Few questions. I do not see onlining code to take care of this special
>>> case. What should happen when offline && online?
>>
>> Once offline, the memmap is garbage. When onlining again:
>>
>> a) memmap will be re-initialized
>> b) online_page_callback_t will be called for every page in the section. The
>> driver can mark them offline again and not give them to the buddy.
>> c) section will be marked online.
>
> But we can skip those pages when onlining and keep them in the offline
> state right? We do not poison offlined pages.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/10/6/60
But again, onlining will overwrite the whole memmap right now and there
is no way to identify if a memmap contains garbage or not.
We would have to identify/remember if re-onlining, but I am not yet sure
if re-using memmaps when onlining is such a good idea ...
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-16 13:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-19 14:22 [PATCH RFC v3 0/9] virtio-mem: paravirtualized memory David Hildenbrand
2019-09-19 14:22 ` [PATCH RFC v3 1/9] ACPI: NUMA: export pxm_to_node David Hildenbrand
2019-09-23 10:13 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-09-23 10:36 ` Michal Hocko
2019-09-23 10:39 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-09-19 14:22 ` [PATCH RFC v3 2/9] virtio-mem: Paravirtualized memory hotplug David Hildenbrand
2019-09-19 14:22 ` [PATCH RFC v3 3/9] virtio-mem: Paravirtualized memory hotunplug part 1 David Hildenbrand
2019-09-19 14:22 ` [PATCH RFC v3 4/9] mm: Export alloc_contig_range() / free_contig_range() David Hildenbrand
2019-10-16 11:20 ` Michal Hocko
2019-10-16 12:31 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-09-19 14:22 ` [PATCH RFC v3 5/9] virtio-mem: Paravirtualized memory hotunplug part 2 David Hildenbrand
2019-09-19 14:22 ` [PATCH RFC v3 6/9] mm: Allow to offline PageOffline() pages with a reference count of 0 David Hildenbrand
2019-10-16 11:43 ` Michal Hocko
2019-10-16 12:50 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-10-16 13:45 ` Michal Hocko
2019-10-16 13:55 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-10-16 14:09 ` Michal Hocko
2019-10-16 14:16 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-10-16 13:59 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2019-10-16 13:45 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-10-16 14:03 ` Michal Hocko
2019-10-16 14:14 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-10-18 8:15 ` Michal Hocko
2019-10-18 8:50 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-10-18 11:20 ` Michal Hocko
2019-10-18 12:35 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-10-22 12:23 ` Michal Hocko
2019-10-22 14:02 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-10-23 9:43 ` Michal Hocko
2019-10-23 10:03 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-10-24 8:42 ` Michal Hocko
2019-10-24 8:51 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-10-25 11:28 ` [PATCH RFC] mm: Allow to offline unmovable PageOffline() pages if the driver agrees David Hildenbrand
2019-09-19 14:22 ` [PATCH RFC v3 7/9] virtio-mem: Allow to offline partially unplugged memory blocks David Hildenbrand
2019-09-19 14:22 ` [PATCH RFC v3 8/9] mm/memory_hotplug: Introduce offline_and_remove_memory() David Hildenbrand
2019-10-16 11:47 ` Michal Hocko
2019-10-16 12:57 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-09-19 14:22 ` [PATCH RFC v3 9/9] virtio-mem: Offline and remove completely unplugged memory blocks David Hildenbrand
2019-10-16 8:12 ` [PATCH RFC v3 0/9] virtio-mem: paravirtualized memory David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50ee63c0-9d0b-0479-a5b9-494e4bc00446@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=anthony.yznaga@oracle.com \
--cc=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=cai@lca.pw \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=kernelfans@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mchehab+samsung@kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=pavel.tatashin@microsoft.com \
--cc=richardw.yang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=yuzhao@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).