From: Ruan Shiyang <ruansy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
<linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>,
<darrick.wong@oracle.com>, <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
<hch@lst.de>, <song@kernel.org>, <rgoldwyn@suse.de>,
<qi.fuli@fujitsu.com>, <y-goto@fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 4/9] mm, fsdax: Refactor memory-failure handler for dax mapping
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 09:48:34 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <513e7602-80d7-8d8c-ed5d-06b8113823bf@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201216212648.GN632069@dread.disaster.area>
On 2020/12/17 上午5:26, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 08:14:09PM +0800, Shiyang Ruan wrote:
>> The current memory_failure_dev_pagemap() can only handle single-mapped
>> dax page for fsdax mode. The dax page could be mapped by multiple files
>> and offsets if we let reflink feature & fsdax mode work together. So,
>> we refactor current implementation to support handle memory failure on
>> each file and offset.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Shiyang Ruan <ruansy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
>> ---
> .....
>> static const char *action_name[] = {
>> @@ -1147,6 +1148,60 @@ static int try_to_split_thp_page(struct page *page, const char *msg)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> +int mf_dax_mapping_kill_procs(struct address_space *mapping, pgoff_t index, int flags)
>> +{
>> + const bool unmap_success = true;
>> + unsigned long pfn, size = 0;
>> + struct to_kill *tk;
>> + LIST_HEAD(to_kill);
>> + int rc = -EBUSY;
>> + loff_t start;
>> + dax_entry_t cookie;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Prevent the inode from being freed while we are interrogating
>> + * the address_space, typically this would be handled by
>> + * lock_page(), but dax pages do not use the page lock. This
>> + * also prevents changes to the mapping of this pfn until
>> + * poison signaling is complete.
>> + */
>> + cookie = dax_lock(mapping, index, &pfn);
>> + if (!cookie)
>> + goto unlock;
>
> Why do we need to prevent the inode from going away here? This
> function gets called by XFS after doing an xfs_iget() call to grab
> the inode that owns the block. Hence the the inode (and the mapping)
> are guaranteed to be referenced and can't go away. Hence for the
> filesystem based callers, this whole "dax_lock()" thing can go away >
> So, AFAICT, the dax_lock() stuff is only necessary when the
> filesystem can't be used to resolve the owner of physical page that
> went bad....
Yes, you are right. I made a mistake in the calling sequence here.
Thanks for pointing out.
--
Thanks,
Ruan Shiyang.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dave.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-18 1:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-15 12:14 [RFC PATCH v3 0/9] fsdax: introduce fs query to support reflink Shiyang Ruan
2020-12-15 12:14 ` [RFC PATCH v3 1/9] pagemap: Introduce ->memory_failure() Shiyang Ruan
2020-12-15 12:14 ` [RFC PATCH v3 2/9] blk: Introduce ->corrupted_range() for block device Shiyang Ruan
2020-12-15 12:14 ` [RFC PATCH v3 3/9] fs: Introduce ->corrupted_range() for superblock Shiyang Ruan
2020-12-15 12:14 ` [RFC PATCH v3 4/9] mm, fsdax: Refactor memory-failure handler for dax mapping Shiyang Ruan
2020-12-16 21:26 ` Dave Chinner
2020-12-18 1:48 ` Ruan Shiyang [this message]
2020-12-15 12:14 ` [RFC PATCH v3 5/9] mm, pmem: Implement ->memory_failure() in pmem driver Shiyang Ruan
2020-12-15 12:14 ` [RFC PATCH v3 6/9] pmem: Implement ->corrupted_range() for " Shiyang Ruan
2020-12-15 12:14 ` [RFC PATCH v3 7/9] dm: Introduce ->rmap() to find bdev offset Shiyang Ruan
2020-12-15 12:14 ` [RFC PATCH v3 8/9] md: Implement ->corrupted_range() Shiyang Ruan
2020-12-15 20:51 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-15 23:28 ` Dave Chinner
2020-12-18 2:11 ` Ruan Shiyang
2021-01-04 23:34 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-01-08 9:52 ` Ruan Shiyang
2021-01-08 19:05 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-16 5:43 ` Jane Chu
2020-12-18 1:50 ` Ruan Shiyang
2020-12-15 12:14 ` [RFC PATCH v3 9/9] xfs: Implement ->corrupted_range() for XFS Shiyang Ruan
2020-12-15 20:40 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-18 2:31 ` Ruan Shiyang
2020-12-16 20:55 ` [RFC PATCH v3 0/9] fsdax: introduce fs query to support reflink Jane Chu
2020-12-18 2:44 ` Ruan Shiyang
2020-12-18 3:49 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-12-18 9:13 ` Ruan Shiyang
2021-01-08 18:14 ` Jane Chu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=513e7602-80d7-8d8c-ed5d-06b8113823bf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=ruansy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=qi.fuli@fujitsu.com \
--cc=rgoldwyn@suse.de \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=y-goto@fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).