From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f44.google.com (mail-wm0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A21BE6B0253 for ; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 06:26:44 -0500 (EST) Received: by wmec201 with SMTP id c201so171065243wme.0 for ; Mon, 16 Nov 2015 03:26:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from eu-smtp-delivery-143.mimecast.com (eu-smtp-delivery-143.mimecast.com. [207.82.80.143]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p3si27876332wjy.59.2015.11.16.03.26.43 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 16 Nov 2015 03:26:43 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/4] KASAN for arm64 References: <1444665180-301-1-git-send-email-ryabinin.a.a@gmail.com> <20151013083432.GG6320@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> From: "Suzuki K. Poulose" Message-ID: <5649BAFD.6030005@arm.com> Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 11:16:13 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20151013083432.GG6320@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Andrey Ryabinin Cc: Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Yury , Alexey Klimov , Arnd Bergmann , linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrey Konovalov , Linus Walleij , Ard Biesheuvel , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kasan-dev , David Keitel , Alexander Potapenko , Dmitry Vyukov On 13/10/15 09:34, Catalin Marinas wrote: > On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 06:52:56PM +0300, Andrey Ryabinin wrote: >> Andrey Ryabinin (3): >> arm64: move PGD_SIZE definition to pgalloc.h >> arm64: add KASAN support >> Documentation/features/KASAN: arm64 supports KASAN now >> >> Linus Walleij (1): >> ARM64: kasan: print memory assignment > > Patches queued for 4.4. Thanks. > Hi, I get the following failure with KASAN + 16K_PAGES + 48BIT_VA, with 4.4-rc1= : arch/arm64/mm/kasan_init.c: In function =91kasan_early_init=92: include/linux/compiler.h:484:38: error: call to =91__compiletime_assert_95= =92 declared with attribute error: BUILD_BUG_ON failed: !IS_ALIGNED(KASAN_S= HADOW_END, PGDIR_SIZE) _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __LINE__) ^ include/linux/compiler.h:467:4: note: in definition of macro =91__compileti= me_assert=92 prefix ## suffix(); \ ^ include/linux/compiler.h:484:2: note: in expansion of macro =91_compiletime= _assert=92 _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __LINE__) ^ include/linux/bug.h:50:37: note: in expansion of macro =91compiletime_asser= t=92 #define BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(cond, msg) compiletime_assert(!(cond), msg) ^ include/linux/bug.h:74:2: note: in expansion of macro =91BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG= =92 BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(condition, "BUILD_BUG_ON failed: " #condition) ^ arch/arm64/mm/kasan_init.c:95:2: note: in expansion of macro =91BUILD_BUG_O= N=92 BUILD_BUG_ON(!IS_ALIGNED(KASAN_SHADOW_END, PGDIR_SIZE)); --- The problem is that the PGDIR_SIZE is (1UL << 47) with 16K+48bit, which mak= es the KASAN_SHADOW_END unaligned(which is aligned to (1UL << (48 - 3)) ). Is = the alignment really needed ? Thoughts on how best we could fix this ? Cheers Suzuki -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org