From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00860C5ACAE for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 02:54:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3AC42085B for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 02:54:12 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org C3AC42085B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=cn.fujitsu.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 63B856B0003; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 22:54:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 5C5C46B0005; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 22:54:12 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 4DABE6B0006; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 22:54:12 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0102.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.102]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 231156B0003 for ; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 22:54:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin12.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id BF85A180AD805 for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 02:54:11 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 75924749502.12.arm64_7bd70f21ea708 X-HE-Tag: arm64_7bd70f21ea708 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2878 Received: from heian.cn.fujitsu.com (mail.cn.fujitsu.com [183.91.158.132]) by imf04.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 02:54:10 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.64,495,1559491200"; d="scan'208";a="75335186" Received: from unknown (HELO cn.fujitsu.com) ([10.167.33.5]) by heian.cn.fujitsu.com with ESMTP; 12 Sep 2019 10:54:08 +0800 Received: from G08CNEXCHPEKD01.g08.fujitsu.local (unknown [10.167.33.80]) by cn.fujitsu.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7D104CE14E8; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 10:53:55 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.167.226.60] (10.167.226.60) by G08CNEXCHPEKD01.g08.fujitsu.local (10.167.33.89) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.439.0; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 10:54:14 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/memblock: fix typo in memblock doc To: Mike Rapoport CC: , References: <20190911030856.18010-1-caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> <20190911144230.GB6429@linux.ibm.com> From: Cao jin Message-ID: <59f571f6-785c-7f6e-fd03-5cfc76da27be@cn.fujitsu.com> Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 10:54:09 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190911144230.GB6429@linux.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.167.226.60] X-yoursite-MailScanner-ID: A7D104CE14E8.A8432 X-yoursite-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-yoursite-MailScanner-From: caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On 9/11/19 10:42 PM, Mike Rapoport wrote: > On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 11:08:56AM +0800, Cao jin wrote: >> elaboarte -> elaborate >> architecure -> architecture >> compltes -> completes >> >> Signed-off-by: Cao jin >> --- >> mm/memblock.c | 6 +++--- >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c >> index 7d4f61ae666a..0d0f92003d18 100644 >> --- a/mm/memblock.c >> +++ b/mm/memblock.c >> @@ -83,16 +83,16 @@ >> * Note, that both API variants use implict assumptions about allowed >> * memory ranges and the fallback methods. Consult the documentation >> * of :c:func:`memblock_alloc_internal` and >> - * :c:func:`memblock_alloc_range_nid` functions for more elaboarte >> + * :c:func:`memblock_alloc_range_nid` functions for more elaborate > > While on it, could you please replace the > :c:func:`memblock_alloc_range_nid` construct with > memblock_alloc_range_nid()? > > And that would be really great to see all the :c:func:`foo` changed to > foo(). > Sure. BTW, do you want convert all the markups too? :c:type:`foo` -> struct foo %FOO -> FOO ``foo`` -> foo **foo** -> foo -- Sincerely, Cao jin