linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Cc: benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au,
	khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com, bsingharora@gmail.com,
	dave.hansen@intel.com, hbabu@us.ibm.com, arnd@arndb.de,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, corbet@lwn.net, mingo@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v4 09/17] powerpc: call the hash functions with the correct pkey value
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 20:54:07 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5e4fa932-4313-5376-2147-a6431bbec16b@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1498558319-32466-10-git-send-email-linuxram@us.ibm.com>



On Tuesday 27 June 2017 03:41 PM, Ram Pai wrote:
> Pass the correct protection key value to the hash functions on
> page fault.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
> ---
>   arch/powerpc/include/asm/pkeys.h | 11 +++++++++++
>   arch/powerpc/mm/hash_utils_64.c  |  4 ++++
>   arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c            |  6 ++++++
>   3 files changed, 21 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pkeys.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pkeys.h
> index ef1c601..1370b3f 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pkeys.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pkeys.h
> @@ -74,6 +74,17 @@ static inline bool mm_pkey_is_allocated(struct mm_struct *mm, int pkey)
>   }
> 
>   /*
> + * return the protection key of the vma corresponding to the
> + * given effective address @ea.
> + */
> +static inline int mm_pkey(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long ea)
> +{
> +	struct vm_area_struct *vma = find_vma(mm, ea);
> +	int pkey = vma ? vma_pkey(vma) : 0;
> +	return pkey;
> +}
> +
> +/*
>

That is not going to work in hash fault path right ? We can't do a 
find_vma there without holding the mmap_sem

-aneesh

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2017-06-27 15:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-27 10:11 [RFC v4 00/17] powerpc: Memory Protection Keys Ram Pai
2017-06-27 10:11 ` [RFC v4 01/17] mm: introduce an additional vma bit for powerpc pkey Ram Pai
2017-06-27 10:54   ` Balbir Singh
2017-06-27 10:11 ` [RFC v4 02/17] mm: ability to disable execute permission on a key at creation Ram Pai
2017-06-27 11:32   ` Balbir Singh
2017-06-27 10:11 ` [RFC v4 03/17] x86: key creation with PKEY_DISABLE_EXECUTE disallowed Ram Pai
2017-06-27 11:32   ` Balbir Singh
2017-06-27 10:11 ` [RFC v4 04/17] powerpc: Implement sys_pkey_alloc and sys_pkey_free system call Ram Pai
2017-06-27 10:11 ` [RFC v4 05/17] powerpc: store and restore the pkey state across context switches Ram Pai
2017-06-27 10:11 ` [RFC v4 06/17] powerpc: Implementation for sys_mprotect_pkey() system call Ram Pai
2017-06-27 10:11 ` [RFC v4 07/17] powerpc: make the hash functions protection-key aware Ram Pai
2017-06-27 10:11 ` [RFC v4 08/17] powerpc: Program HPTE key protection bits Ram Pai
2017-06-27 10:11 ` [RFC v4 09/17] powerpc: call the hash functions with the correct pkey value Ram Pai
2017-06-27 15:24   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2017-06-28  7:12     ` Ram Pai
2017-06-27 10:11 ` [RFC v4 10/17] powerpc: Macro the mask used for checking DSI exception Ram Pai
2017-06-27 10:11 ` [RFC v4 11/17] powerpc: Handle exceptions caused by pkey violation Ram Pai
2017-06-27 10:11 ` [RFC v4 12/17] powerpc: Deliver SEGV signal on " Ram Pai
2017-06-27 10:11 ` [RFC v4 13/17] selftest: Move protecton key selftest to arch neutral directory Ram Pai
2017-06-27 10:11 ` [RFC v4 14/17] selftest: PowerPC specific test updates to memory protection keys Ram Pai
2017-06-27 10:11 ` [RFC v4 15/17] Documentation: Move protecton key documentation to arch neutral directory Ram Pai
2017-06-27 10:11 ` [RFC v4 16/17] Documentation: PowerPC specific updates to memory protection keys Ram Pai
2017-06-27 10:11 ` [RFC v4 17/17] procfs: display the protection-key number associated with a vma Ram Pai
2017-06-28  1:50   ` Michael Ellerman
2017-06-27 10:46 ` [RFC v4 00/17] powerpc: Memory Protection Keys Balbir Singh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5e4fa932-4313-5376-2147-a6431bbec16b@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=bsingharora@gmail.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=hbabu@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).