From: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>
To: 'David Hildenbrand' <david@redhat.com>,
Topi Miettinen <toiwoton@gmail.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: "akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] mm: optionally disable brk()
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2020 11:21:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5fb32353b1964299809fce0c7579a092@AcuMS.aculab.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9dc586f4-38f0-7956-0ab6-bd7921491606@redhat.com>
From: David Hildenbrand
> Sent: 05 October 2020 10:55
...
> > If hardening and compatibility are seen as tradeoffs, perhaps there
> > could be a top level config choice (CONFIG_HARDENING_TRADEOFF) for this.
> > It would have options
> > - "compatibility" (default) to gear questions for maximum compatibility,
> > deselecting any hardening options which reduce compatibility
> > - "hardening" to gear questions for maximum hardening, deselecting any
> > compatibility options which reduce hardening
> > - "none/manual": ask all questions like before
>
> I think the general direction is to avoid an exploding set of config
> options. So if there isn't a *real* demand, I guess gluing this to a
> single option ("CONFIG_SECURITY_HARDENING") might be good enough.
Wouldn't that be better achieved by run-time clobbering
of the syscall vectors?
David
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-05 11:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-02 17:19 [PATCH] mm: optionally disable brk() Topi Miettinen
2020-10-02 17:52 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-10-02 21:19 ` David Laight
2020-10-02 21:44 ` Topi Miettinen
2020-10-05 6:12 ` Michal Hocko
2020-10-05 8:11 ` Topi Miettinen
2020-10-05 8:22 ` Michal Hocko
2020-10-05 9:03 ` Topi Miettinen
2020-10-05 14:12 ` Jonathan Corbet
2020-10-05 16:14 ` Topi Miettinen
2020-10-05 9:13 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-10-05 9:20 ` Michal Hocko
2020-10-05 9:47 ` Topi Miettinen
2020-10-05 9:55 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-10-05 11:21 ` David Laight [this message]
2020-10-05 12:18 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-10-05 12:25 ` David Laight
2020-10-07 9:43 ` Topi Miettinen
2020-11-01 11:41 ` Topi Miettinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5fb32353b1964299809fce0c7579a092@AcuMS.aculab.com \
--to=david.laight@aculab.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=toiwoton@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).