linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: vbabka@suse.cz, rientjes@google.com, kirill@shutemov.name,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v2 PATCH] mm: thp: fix false negative of shmem vma's THP eligibility
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 11:34:13 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6004f688-99d8-3f8c-a106-66ee52c1f0ee@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190423175252.GP25106@dhcp22.suse.cz>



On 4/23/19 10:52 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 24-04-19 00:43:01, Yang Shi wrote:
>> The commit 7635d9cbe832 ("mm, thp, proc: report THP eligibility for each
>> vma") introduced THPeligible bit for processes' smaps. But, when checking
>> the eligibility for shmem vma, __transparent_hugepage_enabled() is
>> called to override the result from shmem_huge_enabled().  It may result
>> in the anonymous vma's THP flag override shmem's.  For example, running a
>> simple test which create THP for shmem, but with anonymous THP disabled,
>> when reading the process's smaps, it may show:
>>
>> 7fc92ec00000-7fc92f000000 rw-s 00000000 00:14 27764 /dev/shm/test
>> Size:               4096 kB
>> ...
>> [snip]
>> ...
>> ShmemPmdMapped:     4096 kB
>> ...
>> [snip]
>> ...
>> THPeligible:    0
>>
>> And, /proc/meminfo does show THP allocated and PMD mapped too:
>>
>> ShmemHugePages:     4096 kB
>> ShmemPmdMapped:     4096 kB
>>
>> This doesn't make too much sense.  The anonymous THP flag should not
>> intervene shmem THP.  Calling shmem_huge_enabled() with checking
>> MMF_DISABLE_THP sounds good enough.  And, we could skip stack and
>> dax vma check since we already checked if the vma is shmem already.
> Kirill, can we get a confirmation that this is really intended behavior
> rather than an omission please? Is this documented? What is a global
> knob to simply disable THP system wise?
>
> I have to say that the THP tuning API is one giant mess :/
>
> Btw. this patch also seem to fix khugepaged behavior because it previously
> ignored both VM_NOHUGEPAGE and MMF_DISABLE_THP.

Aha, I didn't notice this. It looks we need separate the patch to fix 
that khugepaged problem for both 5.1-rc and LTS.

>
>> Fixes: 7635d9cbe832 ("mm, thp, proc: report THP eligibility for each vma")
>> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
>> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
>> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
>> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>
>> Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com>
>> ---
>> v2: Check VM_NOHUGEPAGE per Michal Hocko
>>
>>   mm/huge_memory.c | 4 ++--
>>   mm/shmem.c       | 3 +++
>>   2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
>> index 165ea46..5881e82 100644
>> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
>> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
>> @@ -67,8 +67,8 @@ bool transparent_hugepage_enabled(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
>>   {
>>   	if (vma_is_anonymous(vma))
>>   		return __transparent_hugepage_enabled(vma);
>> -	if (vma_is_shmem(vma) && shmem_huge_enabled(vma))
>> -		return __transparent_hugepage_enabled(vma);
>> +	if (vma_is_shmem(vma))
>> +		return shmem_huge_enabled(vma);
>>   
>>   	return false;
>>   }
>> diff --git a/mm/shmem.c b/mm/shmem.c
>> index 2275a0f..6f09a31 100644
>> --- a/mm/shmem.c
>> +++ b/mm/shmem.c
>> @@ -3873,6 +3873,9 @@ bool shmem_huge_enabled(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
>>   	loff_t i_size;
>>   	pgoff_t off;
>>   
>> +	if ((vma->vm_flags & VM_NOHUGEPAGE) ||
>> +	    test_bit(MMF_DISABLE_THP, &vma->vm_mm->flags))
>> +		return false;
>>   	if (shmem_huge == SHMEM_HUGE_FORCE)
>>   		return true;
>>   	if (shmem_huge == SHMEM_HUGE_DENY)
>> -- 
>> 1.8.3.1
>>


  reply	other threads:[~2019-04-23 18:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-23 16:43 [v2 PATCH] mm: thp: fix false negative of shmem vma's THP eligibility Yang Shi
2019-04-23 17:52 ` Michal Hocko
2019-04-23 18:34   ` Yang Shi [this message]
2019-04-24  0:22     ` Yang Shi
2019-04-24  7:58       ` Michal Hocko
2019-04-28 19:13   ` Yang Shi
2019-05-06 23:37     ` Yang Shi
2019-05-07 10:47       ` Michal Hocko
2019-05-07 17:10         ` Yang Shi
2019-06-06 18:59           ` Yang Shi
2019-06-07 10:57             ` Hugh Dickins
2019-06-07 14:25               ` Michal Hocko
2019-06-07 18:51               ` Yang Shi
2019-04-24 13:10 ` Vlastimil Babka
2019-04-24 15:47   ` Yang Shi
2019-04-24 16:17     ` Vlastimil Babka
2019-04-25 16:44       ` Yang Shi
2019-06-08  3:58 ` Hugh Dickins
2019-06-10 17:33   ` Yang Shi
2019-06-12 18:44     ` Hugh Dickins
2019-06-12 19:59       ` Yang Shi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6004f688-99d8-3f8c-a106-66ee52c1f0ee@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).