From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pg0-f72.google.com (mail-pg0-f72.google.com [74.125.83.72]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41E386810C3 for ; Fri, 25 Aug 2017 12:44:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pg0-f72.google.com with SMTP id a186so1951829pge.5 for ; Fri, 25 Aug 2017 09:44:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com. [192.55.52.88]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w69si4969756pgd.447.2017.08.25.09.44.16 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 25 Aug 2017 09:44:17 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched/wait: Break up long wake list walk References: <37D7C6CF3E00A74B8858931C1DB2F0775378A24A@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> <37D7C6CF3E00A74B8858931C1DB2F0775378A377@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> <37D7C6CF3E00A74B8858931C1DB2F0775378A8AB@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> <6e8b81de-e985-9222-29c5-594c6849c351@linux.intel.com> <85fb2a78-cbb7-dceb-12e8-7d18519c30a0@linux.intel.com> <20170824204448.if2mve3iy5k425di@techsingularity.net> From: Tim Chen Message-ID: <63454831-3259-c758-d164-3b2ff2a04b7e@linux.intel.com> Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 09:44:06 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170824204448.if2mve3iy5k425di@techsingularity.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Mel Gorman , Linus Torvalds Cc: "Liang, Kan" , Mel Gorman , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Andi Kleen , Andrew Morton , Johannes Weiner , Jan Kara , linux-mm , Linux Kernel Mailing List On 08/24/2017 01:44 PM, Mel Gorman wrote: > On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 11:16:15AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 10:49 AM, Tim Chen wrote: >>> >>> These changes look fine. We are testing them now. >>> Does the second patch in the series look okay to you? >> >> I didn't really have any reaction to that one, as long as Mel&co are >> ok with it, I'm fine with it. >> > > I've no strong objections or concerns. I'm disappointed that the > original root cause for this could not be found but hope that eventually a > reproducible test case will eventually be available. Despite having access > to a 4-socket box, I was still unable to create a workload that caused > large delays on wakeup. I'm going to have to stop as I don't think it's > possible to create on that particular machine for whatever reason. > Kan helped to test the updated patch 1 from Linus. It worked fine. I've refreshed the patch set that includes all the changes and send a version 2 refresh of the patch set separately. Thanks. Tim -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org