From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED6B7C433DF for ; Sat, 1 Aug 2020 04:11:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8E82206FA for ; Sat, 1 Aug 2020 04:11:34 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B8E82206FA Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 560A08D0085; Sat, 1 Aug 2020 00:11:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 510658D0081; Sat, 1 Aug 2020 00:11:34 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 44EAB8D0085; Sat, 1 Aug 2020 00:11:34 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0237.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.237]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EC258D0081 for ; Sat, 1 Aug 2020 00:11:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin11.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E75A0181AEF10 for ; Sat, 1 Aug 2020 04:11:33 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77100675666.11.can26_170964a26f89 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin11.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA0FC180F8B82 for ; Sat, 1 Aug 2020 04:11:33 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: can26_170964a26f89 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 5785 Received: from out4436.biz.mail.alibaba.com (out4436.biz.mail.alibaba.com [47.88.44.36]) by imf35.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Sat, 1 Aug 2020 04:11:32 +0000 (UTC) X-Alimail-AntiSpam:AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R141e4;CH=green;DM=||false|;DS=||;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=e01e07425;MF=alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=6;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0U4N-V5x_1596255078; Received: from IT-FVFX43SYHV2H.lan(mailfrom:alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0U4N-V5x_1596255078) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com(127.0.0.1); Sat, 01 Aug 2020 12:11:19 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] mm/thp: move lru_add_page_tail func to huge_memory.c From: Alex Shi To: Andrew Morton Cc: Johannes Weiner , Matthew Wilcox , Hugh Dickins , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org References: <1596254957-22560-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com> Message-ID: <69b09ccd-e353-9310-7fb2-41dc20374eb0@linux.alibaba.com> Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2020 12:11:10 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1596254957-22560-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=gbk X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: BA0FC180F8B82 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 100.00] X-Rspamd-Server: rspam04 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: Hi Andrew, This patchset is just cleanup and get reviewed by Kirill, is it cath up 5= .9? Thanks Alex =D4=DA 2020/8/1 =CF=C2=CE=E712:09, Alex Shi =D0=B4=B5=C0: > The func is only used in huge_memory.c, defining it in other file with = a > CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE macro restrict just looks weird. >=20 > Let's move it THP. And make it static as Hugh Dickin suggested. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Alex Shi > Reviewed-by: Kirill A. Shutemov > Cc: Andrew Morton > Cc: Johannes Weiner > Cc: Matthew Wilcox > Cc: Hugh Dickins > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org > --- > include/linux/swap.h | 2 -- > mm/huge_memory.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > mm/swap.c | 33 --------------------------------- > 3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-) >=20 > diff --git a/include/linux/swap.h b/include/linux/swap.h > index 661046994db4..43e6b3458f58 100644 > --- a/include/linux/swap.h > +++ b/include/linux/swap.h > @@ -338,8 +338,6 @@ extern void lru_note_cost(struct lruvec *lruvec, bo= ol file, > unsigned int nr_pages); > extern void lru_note_cost_page(struct page *); > extern void lru_cache_add(struct page *); > -extern void lru_add_page_tail(struct page *page, struct page *page_tai= l, > - struct lruvec *lruvec, struct list_head *head); > extern void activate_page(struct page *); > extern void mark_page_accessed(struct page *); > extern void lru_add_drain(void); > diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c > index 90733cefa528..bc905e7079bf 100644 > --- a/mm/huge_memory.c > +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c > @@ -2315,6 +2315,36 @@ static void remap_page(struct page *page) > } > } > =20 > +static void lru_add_page_tail(struct page *page, struct page *page_tai= l, > + struct lruvec *lruvec, struct list_head *list) > +{ > + VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageHead(page), page); > + VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageCompound(page_tail), page); > + VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageLRU(page_tail), page); > + lockdep_assert_held(&lruvec_pgdat(lruvec)->lru_lock); > + > + if (!list) > + SetPageLRU(page_tail); > + > + if (likely(PageLRU(page))) > + list_add_tail(&page_tail->lru, &page->lru); > + else if (list) { > + /* page reclaim is reclaiming a huge page */ > + get_page(page_tail); > + list_add_tail(&page_tail->lru, list); > + } else { > + /* > + * Head page has not yet been counted, as an hpage, > + * so we must account for each subpage individually. > + * > + * Put page_tail on the list at the correct position > + * so they all end up in order. > + */ > + add_page_to_lru_list_tail(page_tail, lruvec, > + page_lru(page_tail)); > + } > +} > + > static void __split_huge_page_tail(struct page *head, int tail, > struct lruvec *lruvec, struct list_head *list) > { > diff --git a/mm/swap.c b/mm/swap.c > index d16d65d9b4e0..c674fb441fe9 100644 > --- a/mm/swap.c > +++ b/mm/swap.c > @@ -935,39 +935,6 @@ void __pagevec_release(struct pagevec *pvec) > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(__pagevec_release); > =20 > -#ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE > -/* used by __split_huge_page_refcount() */ > -void lru_add_page_tail(struct page *page, struct page *page_tail, > - struct lruvec *lruvec, struct list_head *list) > -{ > - VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageHead(page), page); > - VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageCompound(page_tail), page); > - VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageLRU(page_tail), page); > - lockdep_assert_held(&lruvec_pgdat(lruvec)->lru_lock); > - > - if (!list) > - SetPageLRU(page_tail); > - > - if (likely(PageLRU(page))) > - list_add_tail(&page_tail->lru, &page->lru); > - else if (list) { > - /* page reclaim is reclaiming a huge page */ > - get_page(page_tail); > - list_add_tail(&page_tail->lru, list); > - } else { > - /* > - * Head page has not yet been counted, as an hpage, > - * so we must account for each subpage individually. > - * > - * Put page_tail on the list at the correct position > - * so they all end up in order. > - */ > - add_page_to_lru_list_tail(page_tail, lruvec, > - page_lru(page_tail)); > - } > -} > -#endif /* CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE */ > - > static void __pagevec_lru_add_fn(struct page *page, struct lruvec *lru= vec, > void *arg) > { >=20