From: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@canonical.com>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com,
linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, kernel@gpiccoli.net,
cascardo@canonical.com, Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
James Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
david@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm, hugetlb: Avoid double clearing for hugetlb pages
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2020 16:37:55 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6c17f146-3d1e-8b9f-835c-1dc33d95aa0c@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201019182853.7467-1-gpiccoli@canonical.com>
Thanks all for the valuable opinions and feedback!
Closing the loop here: so, the proposal wasn't accepted, but an
interesting idea to optimize later hugeTLB allocations was discussed in
the thread - it doesn't help much our case, but it is a performance
optimization.
Cheers,
Guilherme
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-05 19:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-19 18:28 [PATCH] mm, hugetlb: Avoid double clearing for hugetlb pages Guilherme G. Piccoli
2020-10-20 8:20 ` Michal Hocko
2020-10-20 13:36 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-10-20 16:55 ` Mike Kravetz
2020-10-20 19:19 ` Guilherme G. Piccoli
2020-10-20 20:07 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-10-20 20:19 ` Guilherme Piccoli
2020-10-21 6:25 ` Michal Hocko
2020-10-20 20:28 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-10-21 6:15 ` Michal Hocko
2020-10-21 9:50 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-10-21 11:31 ` Michal Hocko
2020-10-21 23:32 ` Mike Kravetz
2020-10-22 8:04 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-10-22 8:55 ` Michal Hocko
2020-10-23 8:23 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-11-05 19:37 ` Guilherme G. Piccoli [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6c17f146-3d1e-8b9f-835c-1dc33d95aa0c@canonical.com \
--to=gpiccoli@canonical.com \
--cc=cascardo@canonical.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=jamorris@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
--cc=kernel@gpiccoli.net \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).