From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qk0-f199.google.com (mail-qk0-f199.google.com [209.85.220.199]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9EFB6B0314 for ; Thu, 1 Jun 2017 16:15:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-qk0-f199.google.com with SMTP id o99so19838161qko.15 for ; Thu, 01 Jun 2017 13:15:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com. [209.132.183.28]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d95si17952050qkh.284.2017.06.01.13.15.37 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 01 Jun 2017 13:15:37 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 11/17] cgroup: Implement new thread mode semantics References: <1494855256-12558-1-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com> <1494855256-12558-12-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com> <20170519202624.GA15279@wtj.duckdns.org> <20170524203616.GO24798@htj.duckdns.org> <9b147a7e-fec3-3b78-7587-3890efcd42f2@redhat.com> <20170524212745.GP24798@htj.duckdns.org> <20170601145042.GA3494@htj.duckdns.org> <20170601151045.xhsv7jauejjis3mi@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> From: Waiman Long Message-ID: <732a13ba-517d-c7d3-56a3-c34b51a8f6fd@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2017 16:15:34 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170601151045.xhsv7jauejjis3mi@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Peter Zijlstra , Tejun Heo Cc: Li Zefan , Johannes Weiner , Ingo Molnar , cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, kernel-team@fb.com, pjt@google.com, luto@amacapital.net, efault@gmx.de On 06/01/2017 11:10 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 10:50:42AM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote: >> Hello, Waiman. >> >> A short update. I tried making root special while keeping the >> existing threaded semantics but I didn't really like it because we >> have to couple controller enables/disables with threaded >> enables/disables. I'm now trying a simpler, albeit a bit more >> tedious, approach which should leave things mostly symmetrical. I'm >> hoping to be able to post mostly working patches this week. > I've not had time to look at any of this. But the question I'm most > curious about is how cgroup-v2 preserves the container invariant. If you don't have much time to look at the patch, I will suggest just looking at the cover letter as well as changes to the cgroup-v2.txt file. You will get a pretty good overview of what this patchset is about. Cheers, Longman -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org