linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zefan Li <lizefan@huawei.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>,
	Cgroups <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memcg: Fix memcg_kmem_bypass() for remote memcg charging
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 19:19:56 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <76f71776-d049-7407-8574-86b6e9d80704@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200513090502.GV29153@dhcp22.suse.cz>

On 2020/5/13 17:05, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Wed 13-05-20 15:28:28, Li Zefan wrote:
>> While trying to use remote memcg charging in an out-of-tree kernel module
>> I found it's not working, because the current thread is a workqueue thread.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Zefan Li <lizefan@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>
>> No need to queue this for v5.7 as currently no upstream users of this memcg
>> feature suffer from this bug.
>>
>> ---
>>  mm/memcontrol.c | 2 ++
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
>> index a3b97f1..db836fc 100644
>> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
>> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
>> @@ -2802,6 +2802,8 @@ static void memcg_schedule_kmem_cache_create(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
>>  
>>  static inline bool memcg_kmem_bypass(void)
>>  {
>> +	if (unlikely(current->active_memcg))
>> +		return false;
> 
> I am confused. Why the check below is insufficient? It checks for both mm
> and PF_KTHREAD?
> 

memalloc_use_memcg(memcg);
alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
memalloc_unuse_memcg();

If we run above code in a workqueue thread the memory won't be charged to the specific
memcg, because memcg_kmem_bypass() returns true in this case.

>>  	if (in_interrupt() || !current->mm || (current->flags & PF_KTHREAD))
>>  		return true;
>>  	return false;


  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-13 11:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-13  7:28 [PATCH] memcg: Fix memcg_kmem_bypass() for remote memcg charging Zefan Li
2020-05-13  9:05 ` Michal Hocko
2020-05-13 11:19   ` Zefan Li [this message]
2020-05-13 11:29     ` Michal Hocko
2020-05-13 11:47       ` [PATCH v2] " Zefan Li
2020-05-13 12:22         ` Shakeel Butt
2020-05-13 13:05         ` Johannes Weiner
2020-05-13 16:11         ` Roman Gushchin
2020-05-14  1:16           ` Zefan Li
2020-05-14 22:52             ` Roman Gushchin
2020-05-15  6:56               ` Michal Hocko
2020-05-15  8:20                 ` Zefan Li
2020-05-15  8:34                   ` Michal Hocko
2020-05-15 16:22                     ` Shakeel Butt
2020-05-15 17:31                       ` Roman Gushchin
2020-05-18  9:13                       ` Michal Hocko
2020-05-26  1:25       ` [PATCH v3] " Zefan Li
2020-05-26 15:53         ` Roman Gushchin
2020-05-27 16:50         ` Shakeel Butt
2020-05-28 14:44         ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=76f71776-d049-7407-8574-86b6e9d80704@huawei.com \
    --to=lizefan@huawei.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).