From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qk0-f200.google.com (mail-qk0-f200.google.com [209.85.220.200]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 652AD6B036A for ; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 12:49:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-qk0-f200.google.com with SMTP id g83so38343650qkb.14 for ; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 09:49:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com. [209.132.183.28]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s6si11684400qkl.38.2017.06.20.09.49.42 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 20 Jun 2017 09:49:42 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 4/6] mm: function to offer a page block on the free list References: <1497004901-30593-1-git-send-email-wei.w.wang@intel.com> <1497004901-30593-5-git-send-email-wei.w.wang@intel.com> <1497977049.20270.100.camel@redhat.com> From: David Hildenbrand Message-ID: <7b626551-6d1b-c8d5-4ef7-e357399e78dc@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 18:49:33 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1497977049.20270.100.camel@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Rik van Riel , Dave Hansen , Wei Wang , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, mst@redhat.com, cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mgorman@techsingularity.net, aarcange@redhat.com, amit.shah@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, liliang.opensource@gmail.com Cc: Nitesh Narayan Lal On 20.06.2017 18:44, Rik van Riel wrote: > On Mon, 2017-06-12 at 07:10 -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: > >> The hypervisor is going to throw away the contents of these pages, >> right? As soon as the spinlock is released, someone can allocate a >> page, and put good data in it. What keeps the hypervisor from >> throwing >> away good data? > > That looks like it may be the wrong API, then? > > We already have hooks called arch_free_page and > arch_alloc_page in the VM, which are called when > pages are freed, and allocated, respectively. > > Nitesh Lal (on the CC list) is working on a way > to efficiently batch recently freed pages for > free page hinting to the hypervisor. > > If that is done efficiently enough (eg. with > MADV_FREE on the hypervisor side for lazy freeing, > and lazy later re-use of the pages), do we still > need the harder to use batch interface from this > patch? > David's opinion incoming: No, I think proper free page hinting would be the optimum solution, if done right. This would avoid the batch interface and even turn virtio-balloon in some sense useless. -- Thanks, David -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org