linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Cc: "Mark Rutland" <Mark.Rutland@arm.com>,
	"Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
	"Ard Biesheuvel" <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	"Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
	"Andy Lutomirski" <luto@kernel.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	"James Morse" <james.morse@arm.com>,
	"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, "Liang,
	Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 14/22] mm: pagewalk: Add 'depth' parameter to pte_hole
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2019 12:00:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7baa4861-eb68-5dcb-137b-482a3b5f52a6@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191007181113.GC13229@ziepe.ca>

On 07/10/2019 19:11, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 05:20:30PM +0100, Steven Price wrote:
>> On 07/10/2019 17:10, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 04:38:14PM +0100, Steven Price wrote:
>>>> diff --git a/mm/hmm.c b/mm/hmm.c
>>>> index 902f5fa6bf93..34fe904dd417 100644
>>>> +++ b/mm/hmm.c
>>>> @@ -376,7 +376,7 @@ static void hmm_range_need_fault(const struct hmm_vma_walk *hmm_vma_walk,
>>>>  }
>>>>  
>>>>  static int hmm_vma_walk_hole(unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
>>>> -			     struct mm_walk *walk)
>>>> +			     __always_unused int depth, struct mm_walk *walk)
>>>
>>> It this __always_unused on function arguments something we are doing
>>> now?
>>
>> $ git grep __always_unused | wc -l
>> 191
>>
>> It's elsewhere in the kernel tree. It seems like a good way of both
>> documenting and silencing compiler warnings. But I'm open to other
>> suggestions.
> 
> The normal kernel build doesn't generate warnings for unused function
> parameters because there are alot of false positives, IIRC. So, seems
> weird to see things like this.
> 
>>> Can we have negative depth? Should it be unsigned?
>>
>> As per the documentation added in this patch:
>>
>>  * @pte_hole:	if set, called for each hole at all levels,
>>  *		depth is -1 if not known, 0:PGD, 1:P4D, 2:PUD, 3:PMD
>>  *		4:PTE. Any folded depths (where PTRS_PER_P?D is equal
>>  *		to 1) are skipped.
>>
>> So it's signed to allow "-1" in the cases where pte_hole is called
>> without knowing the actual depth. This is used in the function
>> walk_page_test() because it don't walk the actual page tables, but is
>> called on a VMA instead. This means that there may not be a single depth
>> for the range provided.
> 
> So are the depth values below OK? I would have expected -1 by this
> definition

Good spot - that indeed was very sloppy of me. In these cases the value
is ignored, but -1 would indeed have been a better value to use. I'll
fix that up.

Thanks,

Steve

>>>>  {
>>>>  	struct hmm_vma_walk *hmm_vma_walk = walk->private;
>>>>  	struct hmm_range *range = hmm_vma_walk->range;
>>>> @@ -564,7 +564,7 @@ static int hmm_vma_walk_pmd(pmd_t *pmdp,
>>>>  again:
>>>>  	pmd = READ_ONCE(*pmdp);
>>>>  	if (pmd_none(pmd))
>>>> -		return hmm_vma_walk_hole(start, end, walk);
>>>> +		return hmm_vma_walk_hole(start, end, 0, walk);
>>>>  
>>>>  	if (thp_migration_supported() && is_pmd_migration_entry(pmd)) {
>>>>  		bool fault, write_fault;
>>>> @@ -666,7 +666,7 @@ static int hmm_vma_walk_pud(pud_t *pudp, unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
>>>>  again:
>>>>  	pud = READ_ONCE(*pudp);
>>>>  	if (pud_none(pud))
>>>> -		return hmm_vma_walk_hole(start, end, walk);
>>>> +		return hmm_vma_walk_hole(start, end, 0, walk);
>>>>  
>>>>  	if (pud_huge(pud) && pud_devmap(pud)) {
>>>>  		unsigned long i, npages, pfn;
>>>> @@ -674,7 +674,7 @@ static int hmm_vma_walk_pud(pud_t *pudp, unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
>>>>  		bool fault, write_fault;
>>>>  
>>>>  		if (!pud_present(pud))
>>>> -			return hmm_vma_walk_hole(start, end, walk);
>>>> +			return hmm_vma_walk_hole(start, end, 0, walk);
>>>>  
>>>>  		i = (addr - range->start) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>>>>  		npages = (end - addr) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
> 



  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-09 11:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-07 15:38 [PATCH v11 00/22] Generic page walk and ptdump Steven Price
2019-10-07 15:38 ` [PATCH v11 01/22] mm: Add generic p?d_leaf() macros Steven Price
2019-10-07 15:38 ` [PATCH v11 02/22] arc: mm: Add p?d_leaf() definitions Steven Price
2019-10-08 20:19   ` Vineet Gupta
2019-10-07 15:38 ` [PATCH v11 03/22] arm: " Steven Price
2019-10-07 15:38 ` [PATCH v11 04/22] arm64: " Steven Price
2019-10-07 15:38 ` [PATCH v11 05/22] mips: " Steven Price
2019-10-07 15:38 ` [PATCH v11 06/22] powerpc: " Steven Price
2019-10-07 15:38 ` [PATCH v11 07/22] riscv: " Steven Price
2019-10-08 11:31   ` Alex Ghiti
2019-10-08 21:33   ` Paul Walmsley
2019-10-09 10:55     ` Steven Price
2019-10-07 15:38 ` [PATCH v11 08/22] s390: " Steven Price
2019-10-07 15:38 ` [PATCH v11 09/22] sparc: " Steven Price
2019-10-07 15:38 ` [PATCH v11 10/22] x86: " Steven Price
2019-10-07 15:38 ` [PATCH v11 11/22] mm: pagewalk: Add p4d_entry() and pgd_entry() Steven Price
2019-10-07 15:38 ` [PATCH v11 12/22] mm: pagewalk: Allow walking without vma Steven Price
2019-10-07 15:38 ` [PATCH v11 13/22] mm: pagewalk: Add test_p?d callbacks Steven Price
2019-10-07 15:38 ` [PATCH v11 14/22] mm: pagewalk: Add 'depth' parameter to pte_hole Steven Price
2019-10-07 16:10   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-07 16:20     ` Steven Price
2019-10-07 18:11       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-10-09 11:00         ` Steven Price [this message]
2019-10-07 15:38 ` [PATCH v11 15/22] x86: mm: Point to struct seq_file from struct pg_state Steven Price
2019-10-07 15:38 ` [PATCH v11 16/22] x86: mm+efi: Convert ptdump_walk_pgd_level() to take a mm_struct Steven Price
2019-10-07 15:38 ` [PATCH v11 17/22] x86: mm: Convert ptdump_walk_pgd_level_debugfs() to take an mm_struct Steven Price
2019-10-07 15:38 ` [PATCH v11 18/22] x86: mm: Convert ptdump_walk_pgd_level_core() " Steven Price
2019-10-07 15:38 ` [PATCH v11 19/22] mm: Add generic ptdump Steven Price
2019-10-07 15:38 ` [PATCH v11 20/22] x86: mm: Convert dump_pagetables to use walk_page_range Steven Price
2019-10-07 15:38 ` [PATCH v11 21/22] arm64: mm: Convert mm/dump.c to use walk_page_range() Steven Price
2019-10-07 15:38 ` [PATCH v11 22/22] arm64: mm: Display non-present entries in ptdump Steven Price

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7baa4861-eb68-5dcb-137b-482a3b5f52a6@arm.com \
    --to=steven.price@arm.com \
    --cc=Mark.Rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).