linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
	Li Xinhai <lixinhai.lxh@gmail.com>,
	"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Cc: akpm <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, mhocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	n-horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm/mempolicy: Skip walking HUGETLB vma if MPOL_MF_STRICT is specified alone
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2020 17:24:22 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7c26d332-c40a-0271-b408-a2079ab00808@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a2f0b0be-e9f1-bef6-1fab-c9d1a556d57a@oracle.com>



On 1/14/20 5:07 PM, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> On 1/14/20 6:09 AM, Li Xinhai wrote:
>> Add cc to
>> Yang Shi <yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com>
>> Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
>> , who has been worked on this part
>>
>> On 2020-01-14 at 17:16 Li Xinhai wrote:
>>> Checking MPOL_MF_STRICT is ignored for HUGETLB vma according to mbind man
>>> page:
>>>
>>> Notes
>>> MPOL_MF_STRICT is ignored on huge page mappings.
>>>
>>> If MPOL_MF_STRICT is specified alone without any MOVE flag, we should
>>> indicate, from test_walk, that walking this vma should be skipped even if
>>> there are misplaced pages.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Li Xinhai <lixinhai.lxh@gmail.com>
>>> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
>>> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
> I do not necessarily disagree with the change.  However, this has made me
> question a couple things:
> 1) Why does the man page say MPOL_MF_STRICT is ignored on huge page mappings?
>     - Is that leftover from the the days when huge page migration was not
>       supported?
>     - Is it just because huge page migration is more likely to fail than
>       base page migration.
> 2) Does the mbind code function properly when unable to migrate a huge page
>     MPOL_MF_STRICT is set?  A quick look at the code looks like it returns
>     EIO.

I don't know the answer about question #1 I didn't dig into the history. 
The queue_pages_hugetlb() returns 0 unconditionally, I think this is 
what "MPOL_MF_STRICT is ignored on huge page mappings" means in code.

It would return -EIO for base pages or THP as what the manpage describes.

>
> I will look into these questions.  However, if someone already knows the
> answer that would be appreciated.



  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-15  1:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-14  9:16 [PATCH 1/2] mm/mempolicy: Checking hstate for hugetlbfs page in vma_migratable Li Xinhai
2020-01-14  9:16 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm/mempolicy: Skip walking HUGETLB vma if MPOL_MF_STRICT is specified alone Li Xinhai
2020-01-14 14:09   ` Li Xinhai
2020-01-14 18:27     ` Yang Shi
2020-01-15  1:07     ` Mike Kravetz
2020-01-15  1:24       ` Yang Shi [this message]
2020-01-15  4:28         ` Mike Kravetz
2020-01-15  5:23           ` Yang Shi
2020-01-15  7:36             ` Li Xinhai
2020-01-15 17:16               ` Yang Shi
2020-01-15 21:07       ` Mike Kravetz
2020-01-15 21:30         ` Yang Shi
2020-01-15 21:45           ` Mike Kravetz
2020-01-15 21:59             ` Yang Shi
2020-01-16  8:07               ` HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
2020-01-16 15:32                 ` Li Xinhai
2020-01-16  7:59         ` Michal Hocko
2020-01-16 19:22           ` Mike Kravetz
2020-01-17  2:32             ` Yang Shi
2020-01-17  2:38             ` Li Xinhai
2020-01-17  7:57               ` Michal Hocko
2020-01-17 12:05                 ` Li Xinhai
2020-01-17 15:20                   ` Michal Hocko
2020-01-17 15:46                     ` Li Xinhai
2020-01-20 12:45                       ` Michal Hocko
2020-01-21 14:15                         ` Li Xinhai
2020-01-21 14:53                           ` Michal Hocko
2020-01-22 13:55                             ` Li Xinhai
2020-01-14 19:12 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm/mempolicy: Checking hstate for hugetlbfs page in vma_migratable Mike Kravetz
2020-01-15  1:25 ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7c26d332-c40a-0271-b408-a2079ab00808@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lixinhai.lxh@gmail.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
    --cc=n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).