From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pg0-f71.google.com (mail-pg0-f71.google.com [74.125.83.71]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CAC82802A5 for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 18:04:14 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-pg0-f71.google.com with SMTP id s2so10463942pge.19 for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 15:04:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com. [192.55.52.115]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 207si10327203pfz.5.2017.11.10.15.04.12 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 10 Nov 2017 15:04:12 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH 24/30] x86, kaiser: disable native VSYSCALL References: <20171108194646.907A1942@viggo.jf.intel.com> <20171108194731.AB5BDA01@viggo.jf.intel.com> <6871f284-b7e9-f843-608f-5345f9d03396@linux.intel.com> <27b55108-1e72-cb3d-d5d8-ffe0238245aa@linux.intel.com> <4c8c441e-d65c-fcec-7718-6997bd010971@linux.intel.com> From: Dave Hansen Message-ID: <7ec56785-8e18-4ac8-ebe8-ebdd3ac265da@linux.intel.com> Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 15:04:07 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Andy Lutomirski Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , moritz.lipp@iaik.tugraz.at, Daniel Gruss , michael.schwarz@iaik.tugraz.at, richard.fellner@student.tugraz.at, Linus Torvalds , Kees Cook , Hugh Dickins , X86 ML On 11/10/2017 02:06 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 10:31 PM, Dave Hansen > wrote: >> On 11/09/2017 06:25 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >>> Here are two proposals to address this without breaking vsyscalls. >>> >>> 1. Set NX on low mappings that are _PAGE_USER. Don't set NX on high >>> mappings but, optionally, warn if you see _PAGE_USER on any address >>> that isn't the vsyscall page. >>> >>> 2. Ignore _PAGE_USER entirely and just mark the EFI mm as special so >>> KAISER doesn't muck with it. >> >> These are totally doable. But, what's the big deal with breaking native >> vsyscall? We can still do the emulation so nothing breaks: it is just slow. > > I have nothing against disabling native. I object to breaking the > weird binary tracing behavior in the emulation mode, especially if > it's tangled up with KAISER. I got all kinds of flak in an earlier > version of the vsyscall emulation patches when I broke that use case. > KAISER may get very widely backported -- let's not make changes that > are already known to break things. Is the thing that broke a "user mode program that actually looks at the vsyscall page"? Like Linus is referring to here: > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CA+55aFyijHb4WnDMKgeXekTZHYT8pajqSAu2peo3O4EKiZbYPA@mail.gmail.com -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org