linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] mm: kvmalloc support __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL for all sizes
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 14:00:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <80500165-94c2-2d5c-ff7a-6310916da288@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170623085345.11304-5-mhocko@kernel.org>

On 06/23/2017 10:53 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> 
> Now that __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL has a reasonable semantic regardless of the
> request size we can drop the hackish implementation for !costly orders.
> __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL retries as long as the reclaim makes a forward
> progress and backs of when we are out of memory for the requested size.
> Therefore we do not need to enforce__GFP_NORETRY for !costly orders just
> to silent the oom killer anymore.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>

The flag is now supported, but not for the embedded page table
allocations, so OOM is still theoretically possible, right?
That should be rare, though. Worth mentioning anywhere?

Other than that.
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>

> ---
>  mm/util.c | 14 ++++----------
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/util.c b/mm/util.c
> index 6520f2d4a226..ee250e2cde34 100644
> --- a/mm/util.c
> +++ b/mm/util.c
> @@ -339,9 +339,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(vm_mmap);
>   * Uses kmalloc to get the memory but if the allocation fails then falls back
>   * to the vmalloc allocator. Use kvfree for freeing the memory.
>   *
> - * Reclaim modifiers - __GFP_NORETRY and __GFP_NOFAIL are not supported. __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL
> - * is supported only for large (>32kB) allocations, and it should be used only if
> - * kmalloc is preferable to the vmalloc fallback, due to visible performance drawbacks.
> + * Reclaim modifiers - __GFP_NORETRY and __GFP_NOFAIL are not supported.
> + * __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL is supported, and it should be used only if kmalloc is
> + * preferable to the vmalloc fallback, due to visible performance drawbacks.
>   *
>   * Any use of gfp flags outside of GFP_KERNEL should be consulted with mm people.
>   */
> @@ -366,13 +366,7 @@ void *kvmalloc_node(size_t size, gfp_t flags, int node)
>  	if (size > PAGE_SIZE) {
>  		kmalloc_flags |= __GFP_NOWARN;
>  
> -		/*
> -		 * We have to override __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL by __GFP_NORETRY for !costly
> -		 * requests because there is no other way to tell the allocator
> -		 * that we want to fail rather than retry endlessly.
> -		 */
> -		if (!(kmalloc_flags & __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL) ||
> -				(size <= PAGE_SIZE << PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER))
> +		if (!(kmalloc_flags & __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL))
>  			kmalloc_flags |= __GFP_NORETRY;
>  	}
>  
> 

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2017-06-26 12:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-23  8:53 [PATCH 0/6] mm: give __GFP_REPEAT a better semantic Michal Hocko
2017-06-23  8:53 ` [PATCH 1/6] MIPS: do not use __GFP_REPEAT for order-0 request Michal Hocko
2017-06-23 10:27   ` Ralf Baechle
2017-06-26  9:36   ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-06-23  8:53 ` [PATCH 2/6] mm, tree wide: replace __GFP_REPEAT by __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL with more useful semantic Michal Hocko
2017-06-26 11:45   ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-06-26 12:14     ` Michal Hocko
2017-06-26 12:17       ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-06-26 12:38         ` Michal Hocko
2017-06-26 12:42           ` Michal Hocko
2017-06-26 11:53   ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-06-23  8:53 ` [PATCH 3/6] xfs: map KM_MAYFAIL to __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL Michal Hocko
2017-06-27  8:49   ` Michal Hocko
2017-06-27 13:47     ` Christoph Hellwig
2017-06-27 14:06       ` Michal Hocko
2017-06-28  4:12         ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-06-23  8:53 ` [PATCH 4/6] mm: kvmalloc support __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL for all sizes Michal Hocko
2017-06-26 12:00   ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2017-06-26 12:18     ` Michal Hocko
2017-06-23  8:53 ` [PATCH 5/6] drm/i915: use __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL Michal Hocko
2017-06-23  8:53 ` [PATCH 6/6] mm, migration: do not trigger OOM killer when migrating memory Michal Hocko
2017-06-23 20:43   ` Andrew Morton
2017-06-26  5:28     ` Michal Hocko
2017-06-26 12:13   ` Vlastimil Babka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=80500165-94c2-2d5c-ff7a-6310916da288@suse.cz \
    --to=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=neilb@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).