From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr1-f71.google.com (mail-wr1-f71.google.com [209.85.221.71]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ECDE8E0161 for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2018 03:41:57 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-wr1-f71.google.com with SMTP id y7so526932wrr.12 for ; Thu, 13 Dec 2018 00:41:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from mo6-p01-ob.smtp.rzone.de (mo6-p01-ob.smtp.rzone.de. [2a01:238:20a:202:5301::11]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e9si750685wrd.451.2018.12.13.00.41.55 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 13 Dec 2018 00:41:55 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: use generic DMA mapping code in powerpc V4 From: Christian Zigotzky References: <1948cf84-49ab-543c-472c-d18e27751903@xenosoft.de> <5a2ea855-b4b0-e48a-5c3e-c859a8451ca2@xenosoft.de> <7B6DDB28-8BF6-4589-84ED-F1D4D13BFED6@xenosoft.de> <8a2c4581-0c85-8065-f37e-984755eb31ab@xenosoft.de> <424bb228-c9e5-6593-1ab7-5950d9b2bd4e@xenosoft.de> <1ecb7692-f3fb-a246-91f9-2db1b9496305@xenosoft.de> <6c997c03-e072-97a9-8ae0-38a4363df919@xenosoft.de> <4cfb3f26-74e1-db01-b014-759f188bb5a6@xenosoft.de> <82879d3f-83de-6438-c1d6-49c571dcb671@xenosoft.de> <20181212141556.GA4801@lst.de> <2242B4B2-6311-492E-BFF9-6740E36EC6D4@xenosoft.de> Message-ID: <84558d7f-5a7f-5219-0c3a-045e6b4c494f@xenosoft.de> Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 09:41:50 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <2242B4B2-6311-492E-BFF9-6740E36EC6D4@xenosoft.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: de-DE Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Darren Stevens , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Julian Margetson , linux-mm@kvack.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Paul Mackerras , Olof Johansson , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org On 12 December 2018 at 3:39PM, Christian Zigotzky wrote: > Hi Christoph, > > Thanks a lot for your reply. I will test your patches tomorrow. > > Cheers, > Christian > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On 12. Dec 2018, at 15:15, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> >> Thanks for bisecting. I've spent some time going over the conversion >> but can't really pinpoint it. I have three little patches that switch >> parts of the code to the generic version. This is on top of the >> last good commmit (977706f9755d2d697aa6f45b4f9f0e07516efeda). >> >> Can you check with whіch one things stop working? >> >> >> <0001-get_required_mask.patch> >> <0002-swiotlb-dma_supported.patch> >> <0003-nommu-dma_supported.patch> >> <0004-alloc-free.patch> Today I tried the first patch (0001-get_required_mask.patch) with the last good commit (977706f9755d2d697aa6f45b4f9f0e07516efeda). Unfortunately this patch is already included in the last good commit (977706f9755d2d697aa6f45b4f9f0e07516efeda). I will try the next patch. -- Christian