From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5845EC4361B for ; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 01:52:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA0632399C for ; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 01:52:11 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org BA0632399C Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=cn.fujitsu.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 01E796B005C; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 20:52:11 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id F10746B005D; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 20:52:10 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id DD8746B0068; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 20:52:10 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0191.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.191]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4D7E6B005C for ; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 20:52:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin08.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91D76181AEF31 for ; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 01:52:10 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77604727620.08.unit26_320875e27439 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin08.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 775961819E773 for ; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 01:52:10 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: unit26_320875e27439 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 3127 Received: from heian.cn.fujitsu.com (mail.cn.fujitsu.com [183.91.158.132]) by imf18.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 01:52:09 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.78,428,1599494400"; d="scan'208";a="102687556" Received: from unknown (HELO cn.fujitsu.com) ([10.167.33.5]) by heian.cn.fujitsu.com with ESMTP; 18 Dec 2020 09:52:07 +0800 Received: from G08CNEXMBPEKD05.g08.fujitsu.local (unknown [10.167.33.204]) by cn.fujitsu.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6EE84CE4BCB; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 09:52:06 +0800 (CST) Received: from irides.mr (10.167.225.141) by G08CNEXMBPEKD05.g08.fujitsu.local (10.167.33.204) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Fri, 18 Dec 2020 09:52:06 +0800 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 8/9] md: Implement ->corrupted_range() To: Jane Chu , , , , CC: , , , , , , , , References: <20201215121414.253660-1-ruansy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> <20201215121414.253660-9-ruansy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> <100fcdf4-b2fe-d77d-e95f-52a7323d7ee1@oracle.com> From: Ruan Shiyang Message-ID: <8742889a-c967-d899-ff32-f4a4ebcde7ad@cn.fujitsu.com> Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2020 09:50:15 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <100fcdf4-b2fe-d77d-e95f-52a7323d7ee1@oracle.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US X-Originating-IP: [10.167.225.141] X-ClientProxiedBy: G08CNEXCHPEKD06.g08.fujitsu.local (10.167.33.205) To G08CNEXMBPEKD05.g08.fujitsu.local (10.167.33.204) X-yoursite-MailScanner-ID: D6EE84CE4BCB.A18A3 X-yoursite-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-yoursite-MailScanner-From: ruansy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On 2020/12/16 =E4=B8=8B=E5=8D=881:43, Jane Chu wrote: > On 12/15/2020 4:14 AM, Shiyang Ruan wrote: >> =C2=A0 #ifdef CONFIG_SYSFS >> +int bd_disk_holder_corrupted_range(struct block_device *bdev, loff_t=20 >> off, >> +=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2= =A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 size_t len, void *data); >> =C2=A0 int bd_link_disk_holder(struct block_device *bdev, struct gendi= sk=20 >> *disk); >> =C2=A0 void bd_unlink_disk_holder(struct block_device *bdev, struct ge= ndisk=20 >> *disk); >> =C2=A0 #else >> +int bd_disk_holder_corrupted_range(struct block_device *bdev, loff_t=20 >> off, >=20 > Did you mean > =C2=A0 static inline int bd_disk_holder_corrupted_range(.. > ? Yes, it's my fault. Thanks a lot. -- Thanks, Ruan Shiyang. >=20 > thanks, > -jane >=20 >> +=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2= =A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 size_t len, void *data) >> +{ >> +=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 return 0; >> +} >> =C2=A0 static inline int bd_link_disk_holder(struct block_device *bdev= , >> =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0= =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 struct= gendisk *disk) >=20 >=20