From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB0F0C432BE for ; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 10:17:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63F9A6103B for ; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 10:17:52 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 63F9A6103B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id D2F7F6B006C; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 06:17:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id CDFA48D0002; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 06:17:51 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id BCE298D0001; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 06:17:51 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0111.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.111]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A47BE6B006C for ; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 06:17:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin38.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D2B4181C8F0E for ; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 10:17:51 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 78455141142.38.A9C3772 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) by imf08.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C501030000A0 for ; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 10:17:50 +0000 (UTC) From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1628504266; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=mUREw8STJ2JWCIPIy1C7QUNcphVARQ51gXSM8DV+C24=; b=KQ+99kkaNjD1Av179Orlm992PCKb9LQzNHyTyYJk474sOaLFDMzrbEBo6VnDQwMIVOj0HH 7Vg0WcdSPCRQOEQHqYYuIK+UBl0jXtaYiAhTcrzrh+SUhwdbKclZKG1jj/plt0+/CcVGcA bLD8R9rMzuCZvr7xK0abr8E/CwnBZvfI5WSt0o3fFHoYUOOITjejDc5B+fezadwrhIRLTt TZJcnsSoWyvZ+APsd/QLAupLicHnGocK0NwpIqTyYUG/V0JngnJh0tjRsTvpLNuam6kfzH EKUTywhCFPQ1Z/zEOg3hcVfw7+bbs7rkMddgaG6HbkkL3lwOCAbxndQBkwxKRQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1628504266; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=mUREw8STJ2JWCIPIy1C7QUNcphVARQ51gXSM8DV+C24=; b=dhN5EycmkS7LI28GcBkJIEkszO1KtksoHgVU9B71fNWgSUeiW3cJKGvECK+nH+MgDE/3J0 WdvR44JAO/80+iCA== To: "Chen, Rong A" , Dave Hansen , kernel test robot , Dave Hansen Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Linux Memory Management List ,linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,Shuah Khan Subject: Re: [kbuild-all] Re: sparc64-linux-gcc: error: unrecognized command-line option '-mxsave' In-Reply-To: <277810e0-3887-f5d4-a150-60fdb1626e60@intel.com> References: <202107271153.7QWf3g6F-lkp@intel.com> <8bee8632-9129-bb02-ab94-f65786e65268@intel.com> <87a6lu68xv.ffs@tglx> <277810e0-3887-f5d4-a150-60fdb1626e60@intel.com> Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2021 12:17:46 +0200 Message-ID: <87im0eudkl.ffs@tglx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Authentication-Results: imf08.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=linutronix.de header.s=2020 header.b=KQ+99kka; dkim=pass header.d=linutronix.de header.s=2020e header.b=dhN5Eycm; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass (imf08.hostedemail.com: domain of tglx@linutronix.de designates 193.142.43.55 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=tglx@linutronix.de X-Stat-Signature: 6stxkun6jwyxrducnoo7bf7kje947nca X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: C501030000A0 X-Rspamd-Server: rspam01 X-HE-Tag: 1628504270-922997 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Mon, Aug 09 2021 at 09:54, Rong A. Chen wrote: > On 8/6/2021 8:42 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 04 2021 at 17:04, Rong A. Chen wrote: >>> On 7/27/2021 10:52 PM, Dave Hansen wrote: >>>> On 7/26/21 8:11 PM, kernel test robot wrote: >>>>>>> sparc64-linux-gcc: error: unrecognized command-line option '-mxsave' >>>> >>>> Is there something else funky going on here? All of the "-mxsave" flags >>>> that I can find are under checks for x86 builds, like: >>>> >>>> ifeq ($(CAN_BUILD_I386),1) >>>> $(BINARIES_32): CFLAGS += -m32 -mxsave >>>> .. >>>> >>>> I'm confused how we could have a sparc64 compiler (and only a sparc64 >>>> compiler) that would end up with "-mxsave" in CFLAGS. >>> >>> Hi Dave, >>> >>> We can reproduce the error and have no idea too, but we have disabled >>> the test for selftests on non-x86 arch. >> >> This smells like a host/target compiler mixup. Can you please make the >> kernel build verbose with 'V=1' and provide the full build output? > > Hi Thomas, > > I run the below command: > > $make V=1 --keep-going CROSS_COMPILE=sparc64-linux- -j1 O=build_dir > ARCH=sparc64 -C tools/testing/selftests/vm > ... > sparc64-linux-gcc -Wall -I ../../../../usr/include -no-pie -m32 -mxsave > protection_keys.c -lrt -lpthread -lrt -ldl -lm -o > /root/linux/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys_32 > sparc64-linux-gcc: error: unrecognized command-line option '-mxsave' > make: *** [Makefile:107: Right. That's clearly broken because all these x8664 muck is derived from: MACHINE ?= $(shell echo $(uname_M) | sed -e 's/aarch64.*/arm64/' -e 's/ppc64.*/ppc64/') which obviously fails for cross compiling because it's looking at the compile machine and not at the target. Something like the below should cure that, but TBH I lost track which one of ARCH, SUBARCH, UTS_MACHINE should be used here. The kbuild folks should know. Thanks, tglx --- --- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/Makefile +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/Makefile @@ -4,7 +4,6 @@ include local_config.mk uname_M := $(shell uname -m 2>/dev/null || echo not) -MACHINE ?= $(shell echo $(uname_M) | sed -e 's/aarch64.*/arm64/' -e 's/ppc64.*/ppc64/') # Without this, failed build products remain, with up-to-date timestamps, # thus tricking Make (and you!) into believing that All Is Well, in subsequent @@ -46,7 +45,7 @@ TEST_GEN_FILES += transhuge-stress TEST_GEN_FILES += userfaultfd TEST_GEN_FILES += split_huge_page_test -ifeq ($(MACHINE),x86_64) +ifeq ($(UTS_MACHINE),x86_64) CAN_BUILD_I386 := $(shell ./../x86/check_cc.sh $(CC) ../x86/trivial_32bit_program.c -m32) CAN_BUILD_X86_64 := $(shell ./../x86/check_cc.sh $(CC) ../x86/trivial_64bit_program.c) CAN_BUILD_WITH_NOPIE := $(shell ./../x86/check_cc.sh $(CC) ../x86/trivial_program.c -no-pie) @@ -68,7 +67,7 @@ TEST_GEN_FILES += $(BINARIES_64) endif else -ifneq (,$(findstring $(MACHINE),ppc64)) +ifneq (,$(findstring $(UTS_MACHINE),ppc64)) TEST_GEN_FILES += protection_keys endif @@ -87,7 +86,7 @@ TEST_FILES := test_vmalloc.sh KSFT_KHDR_INSTALL := 1 include ../lib.mk -ifeq ($(MACHINE),x86_64) +ifeq ($(UTS_MACHINE),x86_64) BINARIES_32 := $(patsubst %,$(OUTPUT)/%,$(BINARIES_32)) BINARIES_64 := $(patsubst %,$(OUTPUT)/%,$(BINARIES_64))