From: "Huang\, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/3] mm: Discard lazily freed pages when migrating
Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2020 12:05:35 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r1y6yvow.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200305104859.GG3772@suse.de> (Mel Gorman's message of "Thu, 5 Mar 2020 10:48:59 +0000")
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> writes:
> On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 07:15:20PM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote:
>> In which situation the cost to reconstruct MADV_FREE pages can be higher
>> than the cost to allocate file cache page and read from disk? Heavy
>> contention on mmap_sem?
>>
>
> MADV_FREE should be anonymous only
>
> if (behavior == MADV_FREE)
> return madvise_free_single_vma(vma, start, end);
>
> .....
>
> static int madvise_free_single_vma(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> unsigned long start_addr, unsigned long end_addr)
> {
> struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm;
> struct mmu_notifier_range range;
> struct mmu_gather tlb;
>
> /* MADV_FREE works for only anon vma at the moment */
> if (!vma_is_anonymous(vma))
> return -EINVAL
>
> So the question is not applicable. For anonymous memory, the cost of
> updating a PTE is lower than allocating a page, zeroing it and updating
> the PTE.
Sorry for confusing. The original question is NOT about comparing the
reconstruction cost between MADV_FREE anon pages and MADV_FREE file
pages, BUT about comparing the reconstruction cost between MADV_FREE
anon pages and ordinary clean file cache pages. You can find more
details in conversation between Michal and me.
> It has been repeatedly stated now for almost a week that a semantic
> change to MADV_FREE should be based on a problem encountered by a real
> application that can benefit from the new semantics. I think the only
> concrete outcome has been that userspace potentially benefits if the total
> number of MADV_FREE pages is reported globally. Even that is marginal as
> smaps has the information to tell the difference between high RSS due to
> a memory leak and high RSS usage due to MADV_FREE. The /proc/vmstats for
> MADV_FREE are of marginal benefit given that they do not tell us much
> about the current number of MADV_FREE pages in the system.
Got it! Thanks a lot for your patience and sharing. That's very
helpful.
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-06 4:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-28 3:38 [RFC 0/3] mm: Discard lazily freed pages when migrating Huang, Ying
2020-02-28 3:38 ` [RFC 1/3] mm, migrate: Check return value of try_to_unmap() Huang, Ying
2020-02-28 3:38 ` [RFC 2/3] mm: Add a new page flag PageLayzyFree() for MADV_FREE Huang, Ying
2020-02-28 6:13 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-28 6:47 ` Huang, Ying
2020-03-15 8:18 ` Wei Yang
2020-03-15 8:54 ` Mika Penttilä
2020-03-15 12:22 ` Wei Yang
2020-03-16 1:21 ` Huang, Ying
2020-03-16 22:38 ` Wei Yang
2020-02-28 3:38 ` [RFC 3/3] mm: Discard lazily freed pages when migrating Huang, Ying
2020-02-28 3:42 ` [RFC 0/3] " Matthew Wilcox
2020-02-28 7:25 ` Huang, Ying
2020-02-28 8:22 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-02-28 8:55 ` Huang, Ying
2020-02-28 9:49 ` Mel Gorman
2020-03-02 11:23 ` Huang, Ying
2020-03-02 15:16 ` Mel Gorman
2020-03-03 1:51 ` Huang, Ying
2020-03-03 8:09 ` Michal Hocko
2020-03-03 8:47 ` Huang, Ying
2020-03-03 8:58 ` Michal Hocko
2020-03-03 11:49 ` Huang, Ying
2020-03-04 9:58 ` Michal Hocko
2020-03-04 10:56 ` Mel Gorman
2020-03-05 1:42 ` Huang, Ying
2020-03-04 11:15 ` Huang, Ying
2020-03-04 11:26 ` Michal Hocko
2020-03-05 1:45 ` Huang, Ying
2020-03-05 10:48 ` Mel Gorman
2020-03-06 4:05 ` Huang, Ying [this message]
2020-03-09 5:26 ` Huang, Ying
2020-03-03 13:02 ` Mel Gorman
2020-03-04 0:33 ` Huang, Ying
2020-02-28 9:50 ` Michal Hocko
2020-02-28 10:15 ` Michal Hocko
2020-02-28 13:45 ` Johannes Weiner
2020-03-02 14:12 ` Huang, Ying
2020-03-02 14:23 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-03-03 0:25 ` Huang, Ying
2020-03-02 14:25 ` Michal Hocko
2020-03-03 1:30 ` Huang, Ying
2020-03-03 8:19 ` Michal Hocko
2020-03-03 11:36 ` Huang, Ying
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87r1y6yvow.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com \
--to=ying.huang@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=minchan@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).