linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFCv1][WIP] ext2: Move direct-io to use iomap
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2023 21:41:25 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ttyfz9le.fsf@doe.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230316154143.GA11351@frogsfrogsfrogs>

"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org> writes:

> On Thu, Mar 16, 2023 at 08:10:29PM +0530, Ritesh Harjani (IBM) wrote:
>> [DO NOT MERGE] [WORK-IN-PROGRESS]
>>
>> Hello Jan,
>>
>> This is an initial version of the patch set which I wanted to share
>> before today's call. This is still work in progress but atleast passes
>> the set of test cases which I had kept for dio testing (except 1 from my
>> list).
>>
>> Looks like there won't be much/any changes required from iomap side to
>> support ext2 moving to iomap apis.
>>
>> I will be doing some more testing specifically test generic/083 which is
>> occassionally failing in my testing.
>> Also once this is stabilized, I can do some performance testing too if you
>> feel so. Last I remembered we saw some performance regressions when ext4
>> moved to iomap for dio.
>>
>> PS: Please ignore if there are some silly mistakes. As I said, I wanted
>> to get this out before today's discussion. :)
>>
>> Thanks for your help!!
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>  fs/ext2/ext2.h  |   1 +
>>  fs/ext2/file.c  | 114 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  fs/ext2/inode.c |  20 +--------
>>  3 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/ext2/ext2.h b/fs/ext2/ext2.h
>> index cb78d7dcfb95..cb5e309fe040 100644
>> --- a/fs/ext2/ext2.h
>> +++ b/fs/ext2/ext2.h
>> @@ -753,6 +753,7 @@ extern unsigned long ext2_count_free (struct buffer_head *, unsigned);
>>  extern struct inode *ext2_iget (struct super_block *, unsigned long);
>>  extern int ext2_write_inode (struct inode *, struct writeback_control *);
>>  extern void ext2_evict_inode(struct inode *);
>> +extern void ext2_write_failed(struct address_space *mapping, loff_t to);
>>  extern int ext2_get_block(struct inode *, sector_t, struct buffer_head *, int);
>>  extern int ext2_setattr (struct mnt_idmap *, struct dentry *, struct iattr *);
>>  extern int ext2_getattr (struct mnt_idmap *, const struct path *,
>> diff --git a/fs/ext2/file.c b/fs/ext2/file.c
>> index 6b4bebe982ca..7a8561304559 100644
>> --- a/fs/ext2/file.c
>> +++ b/fs/ext2/file.c
>> @@ -161,12 +161,123 @@ int ext2_fsync(struct file *file, loff_t start, loff_t end, int datasync)
>>  	return ret;
>>  }
>>
>> +static ssize_t ext2_dio_read_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *to)
>> +{
>> +	struct file *file = iocb->ki_filp;
>> +	struct inode *inode = file->f_mapping->host;
>> +	ssize_t ret;
>> +
>> +	inode_lock_shared(inode);
>> +	ret = iomap_dio_rw(iocb, to, &ext2_iomap_ops, NULL, 0, NULL, 0);
>> +	inode_unlock_shared(inode);
>> +
>> +	return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int ext2_dio_write_end_io(struct kiocb *iocb, ssize_t size,
>> +				 int error, unsigned int flags)
>> +{
>> +	loff_t pos = iocb->ki_pos;
>> +	struct inode *inode = file_inode(iocb->ki_filp);
>> +
>> +	if (error)
>> +		return error;
>> +
>> +	pos += size;
>> +	if (pos > i_size_read(inode))
>> +		i_size_write(inode, pos);
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const struct iomap_dio_ops ext2_dio_write_ops = {
>> +	.end_io = ext2_dio_write_end_io,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static ssize_t ext2_dio_write_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from)
>> +{
>> +	struct file *file = iocb->ki_filp;
>> +	struct inode *inode = file->f_mapping->host;
>> +	ssize_t ret;
>> +	unsigned int flags;
>> +	unsigned long blocksize = inode->i_sb->s_blocksize;
>> +	loff_t offset = iocb->ki_pos;
>> +	loff_t count = iov_iter_count(from);
>> +
>> +
>> +	inode_lock(inode);
>> +	ret = generic_write_checks(iocb, from);
>> +	if (ret <= 0)
>> +		goto out_unlock;
>> +	ret = file_remove_privs(file);
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		goto out_unlock;
>> +	ret = file_update_time(file);
>> +	if (ret)
>> +		goto out_unlock;
>
> kiocb_modified() instead of calling file_remove_privs?

Yes, looks likle it is a replacement for file_remove_privs and
file_update_time().


>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * We pass IOMAP_DIO_NOSYNC because otherwise iomap_dio_rw()
>> +	 * calls for generic_write_sync in iomap_dio_complete().
>> +	 * Since ext2_fsync nmust be called w/o inode lock,
>> +	 * hence we pass IOMAP_DIO_NOSYNC and handle generic_write_sync()
>> +	 * ourselves.
>> +	 */
>> +	flags = IOMAP_DIO_NOSYNC;
>> +
>> +	/* use IOMAP_DIO_FORCE_WAIT for unaligned of extending writes */
>> +	if (iocb->ki_pos + iov_iter_count(from) > i_size_read(inode) ||
>> +	   (!IS_ALIGNED(iocb->ki_pos | iov_iter_alignment(from), blocksize)))
>> +		flags |= IOMAP_DIO_FORCE_WAIT;
>> +
>> +	ret = iomap_dio_rw(iocb, from, &ext2_iomap_ops, &ext2_dio_write_ops,
>> +			   flags, NULL, 0);
>> +
>> +	if (ret == -ENOTBLK)
>> +		ret = 0;
>> +
>> +	if (ret < 0 && ret != -EIOCBQUEUED)
>> +		ext2_write_failed(inode->i_mapping, offset + count);
>> +
>> +	/* handle case for partial write or fallback to buffered write */
>> +	if (ret >= 0 && iov_iter_count(from)) {
>> +		loff_t pos, endbyte;
>> +		ssize_t status;
>> +		ssize_t ret2;
>> +
>> +		pos = iocb->ki_pos;
>> +		status = generic_perform_write(iocb, from);
>> +		if (unlikely(status < 0)) {
>> +			ret = status;
>> +			goto out_unlock;
>> +		}
>> +		endbyte = pos + status - 1;
>> +		ret2 = filemap_write_and_wait_range(inode->i_mapping, pos,
>> +						    endbyte);
>> +		if (ret2 == 0) {
>> +			iocb->ki_pos = endbyte + 1;
>> +			ret += status;
>> +			invalidate_mapping_pages(inode->i_mapping,
>> +						 pos >> PAGE_SHIFT,
>> +						 endbyte >> PAGE_SHIFT);
>> +		}
>> +	}
>
> (Why not fall back to the actual buffered write path?)
>

Because then we can handle everything related to DIO in
ext4_dio_file_write() itself e.g. As per the semantics of DIO we should
ensure that page-cache pages are written to disk and invalidated before
returning (filemap_write_and_wait_range() and invalidate_mapping_pages())

> Otherwise this looks like a reasonable first start.

Thanks!

-ritesh


  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-20 16:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-29  4:46 LSF/MM/BPF 2023 IOMAP conversion status update Luis Chamberlain
2023-01-29  5:06 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-01-29  5:39   ` Luis Chamberlain
2023-02-08 16:04   ` Jan Kara
2023-02-24  7:01     ` Zhang Yi
2023-02-26 20:16     ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-03-16 14:40       ` [RFCv1][WIP] ext2: Move direct-io to use iomap Ritesh Harjani (IBM)
2023-03-16 15:41         ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-03-20 16:11           ` Ritesh Harjani [this message]
2023-03-20 13:15         ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-03-20 17:51         ` Jan Kara
2023-03-22  6:34           ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-03-23 11:30             ` Jan Kara
2023-03-23 13:19               ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-03-30  0:02               ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-02-27 19:26     ` LSF/MM/BPF 2023 IOMAP conversion status update Darrick J. Wong
2023-02-27 21:02       ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-02-27 19:47   ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-02-27 20:24     ` Luis Chamberlain
2023-02-27 19:06 ` Darrick J. Wong
2023-02-27 19:58   ` Luis Chamberlain
2023-03-01 16:59 ` Ritesh Harjani
2023-03-01 17:08   ` Darrick J. Wong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87ttyfz9le.fsf@doe.com \
    --to=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).