From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pl0-f72.google.com (mail-pl0-f72.google.com [209.85.160.72]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9657E6B0007 for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2018 21:17:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-pl0-f72.google.com with SMTP id 39-v6so4047228ple.6 for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2018 18:17:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mga12.intel.com (mga12.intel.com. [192.55.52.136]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x2-v6si7948142plv.388.2018.06.28.18.17.17 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 28 Jun 2018 18:17:18 -0700 (PDT) From: "Huang\, Ying" Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm -v4 00/21] mm, THP, swap: Swapout/swapin THP in one piece References: <20180622035151.6676-1-ying.huang@intel.com> <20180627215144.73e98b01099191da59bff28c@linux-foundation.org> <87r2krfpi2.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com> <20180627223118.dd2f52d87f53e7e002ed0153@linux-foundation.org> <87muvffp7w.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com> <20180627231839.e5ac2f38e0397979d3db7765@linux-foundation.org> <20180628090301.GC7646@bombadil.infradead.org> Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2018 09:17:16 +0800 In-Reply-To: <20180628090301.GC7646@bombadil.infradead.org> (Matthew Wilcox's message of "Thu, 28 Jun 2018 02:03:01 -0700") Message-ID: <87woui9ysj.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Hugh Dickins , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Daniel Jordan Matthew Wilcox writes: > On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 11:18:39PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: >> On Thu, 28 Jun 2018 13:35:15 +0800 "Huang\, Ying" wrote: >> > No problem. I will rebase the patchset on your latest -mm tree, or the >> > next version to be released? >> >> We need to figure that out with Matthew. >> >> Probably the xarray conversions are simpler and more mature so yes, >> probably they should be staged first. > > I'll take a look. Honestly, my biggest problem with this patch set is > overuse of tagging: > > 59832 Jun 22 Huang, Ying ( 131) [PATCH -mm -v4 00/21] mm, THP, swap: Swa > 59833 N Jun 22 Huang, Ying ( 126) a??a??>[PATCH -mm -v4 01/21] mm, THP, swap: > 59834 N Jun 22 Huang, Ying ( 44) a??a??>[PATCH -mm -v4 02/21] mm, THP, swap: > 59835 N Jun 22 Huang, Ying ( 583) a??a??>[PATCH -mm -v4 03/21] mm, THP, swap: > 59836 N Jun 22 Huang, Ying ( 104) a??a??>[PATCH -mm -v4 04/21] mm, THP, swap: > 59837 N Jun 22 Huang, Ying ( 394) a??a??>[PATCH -mm -v4 05/21] mm, THP, swap: > 59838 N Jun 22 Huang, Ying ( 198) a??a??>[PATCH -mm -v4 06/21] mm, THP, swap: > 59839 N Jun 22 Huang, Ying ( 161) a??a??>[PATCH -mm -v4 07/21] mm, THP, swap: > 59840 N Jun 22 Huang, Ying ( 351) a??a??>[PATCH -mm -v4 08/21] mm, THP, swap: > 59841 N Jun 22 Huang, Ying ( 293) a??a??>[PATCH -mm -v4 09/21] mm, THP, swap: > 59842 N Jun 22 Huang, Ying ( 138) a??a??>[PATCH -mm -v4 10/21] mm, THP, swap: > 59843 N Jun 22 Huang, Ying ( 264) a??a??>[PATCH -mm -v4 11/21] mm, THP, swap: > 59844 N Jun 22 Huang, Ying ( 251) a??a??>[PATCH -mm -v4 12/21] mm, THP, swap: > 59845 N Jun 22 Huang, Ying ( 121) a??a??>[PATCH -mm -v4 13/21] mm, THP, swap: > 59846 N Jun 22 Huang, Ying ( 517) a??a??>[PATCH -mm -v4 14/21] mm, cgroup, THP > 59847 N Jun 22 Huang, Ying ( 128) a??a??>[PATCH -mm -v4 15/21] mm, THP, swap: > 59848 N Jun 22 Huang, Ying ( 85) a??a??>[PATCH -mm -v4 16/21] mm, THP, swap: > 59849 N Jun 22 Huang, Ying ( 70) a??a??>[PATCH -mm -v4 17/21] mm, THP, swap: > > There's literally zero useful information displayed in the patch subjects. Thanks! What's your suggestion on tagging? Only keep "mm" or "swap"? Best Regards, Huang, Ying