From: hejianet <hejianet@gmail.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
Taku Izumi <izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/1] mm, page_alloc: fix incorrect zone_statistics data
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:07:12 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8cb130a7-3753-7f14-632b-11d53bf2272d@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161220123121.e4wgkxm2txdoxogo@techsingularity.net>
On 20/12/2016 8:31 PM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 01:59:07PM +0800, Jia He wrote:
>> In commit b9f00e147f27 ("mm, page_alloc: reduce branches in
>> zone_statistics"), it reconstructed codes to reduce the branch miss rate.
>> Compared with the original logic, it assumed if !(flag & __GFP_OTHER_NODE)
>> z->node would not be equal to preferred_zone->node. That seems to be
>> incorrect.
>>
>> Fixes: commit b9f00e147f27 ("mm, page_alloc: reduce branches in
>> zone_statistics")
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jia He <hejianet@gmail.com>
> This is slightly curious. It appear it would only occur if a process was
> running on a node that was outside the memory policy. Can you confirm
> that is the case?
Yes, here is what I caught:
dumpstack() is triggered when z->node(5) == preferred_zone->node(5) and z->node != numa_node_id(4)
without flag GET_OTHER_NODE
It is not a rare case. I saw hundreds of such cases when kernel boots up
[c000000cdcaef440] [c0000000002e88cc] cache_grow_begin+0xcc/0x500
[c000000cdcaef6f0] [c0000000002ecb44] do_tune_cpucache+0x64/0x100
[c000000cdcaef750] [c0000000002ecc7c] enable_cpucache+0x9c/0x180
[c000000cdcaef7d0] [c0000000002ed01c] __kmem_cache_create+0x1ec/00x2c0
[c000000cdcaef820] [c000000000291c98] create_cache+0xb8/0x240
[c000000cdcaef890] [c000000000291fa8] kmem_cache_create+0x188/0x2290
[c000000cdcaef950] [d000000011dc5c70] ext4_mb_init+0x3c0/0x5e0 [eext4]
[c000000cdcaef9f0] [d000000011daaedc] ext4_fill_super+0x266c/0x33390 [ext4]
[c000000cdcaefb30] [c000000000328b8c] mount_bdev+0x22c/0x260
[c000000cdcaefbd0] [d000000011da1fa8] ext4_mount+0x48/0x60 [ext4]
[c000000cdcaefc10] [c00000000032a11c] mount_fs+0x8c/0x230
[c000000cdcaefcb0] [c000000000351f98] vfs_kern_mount+0x78/0x180
[c000000cdcaefd00] [c000000000356d68] do_mount+0x258/0xea0
[c000000cdcaefde0] [c000000000357da0] SyS_mount+0xa0/0x110
[c000000cdcaefe30] [c00000000000bd84] system_call+0x38/0xe0
> If so, your patch is a a semantic curiousity because it's actually
> impossible for a NUMA allocation to be local and the definition of "HIT"
> is fuzzy enough to be useless.
>
> I won't object to the patch but it makes me trust "hit" even less than I
> already do for any analysis.
>
> Note that after this mail that I'll be unavailable by mail until early
> new years.
>
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-21 3:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-12 5:59 [PATCH RFC 0/1] mm, page_alloc: fix incorrect zone_statistics data Jia He
2016-12-12 5:59 ` [PATCH RFC 1/1] " Jia He
2016-12-20 9:18 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-20 13:10 ` Mel Gorman
2016-12-20 13:26 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-20 14:28 ` Mel Gorman
2016-12-20 14:35 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-20 14:49 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-12-20 14:54 ` Mel Gorman
2016-12-21 7:57 ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-21 8:06 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm: fix remote numa hits statistics Michal Hocko
2016-12-21 8:06 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm: get rid of __GFP_OTHER_NODE Michal Hocko
2017-01-02 14:18 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-12-29 11:46 ` [PATCH 1/2] mm: fix remote numa hits statistics Mel Gorman
2016-12-29 12:28 ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-02 14:16 ` Vlastimil Babka
2017-01-02 14:46 ` Michal Hocko
2017-01-02 15:07 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-12-20 14:42 ` [PATCH RFC 1/1] mm, page_alloc: fix incorrect zone_statistics data Mel Gorman
2016-12-20 15:13 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-12-21 3:01 ` hejianet
2016-12-20 12:31 ` Mel Gorman
2016-12-21 3:07 ` hejianet [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8cb130a7-3753-7f14-632b-11d53bf2272d@gmail.com \
--to=hejianet@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).