From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAF02C10F15 for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2024 17:14:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 5C2A46B02CE; Wed, 24 Apr 2024 13:14:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 524896B02D2; Wed, 24 Apr 2024 13:14:42 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 2A7A18D001F; Wed, 24 Apr 2024 13:14:42 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0012.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.12]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 062AD6B02CF for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2024 13:14:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin21.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92C35A0BD1 for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2024 17:14:41 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 82045074762.21.AC5CE95 Received: from gentwo.org (gentwo.org [62.72.0.81]) by imf07.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F33B4000E for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2024 17:14:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: imf07.hostedemail.com; dkim=none; dmarc=fail reason="No valid SPF, No valid DKIM" header.from=linux.com (policy=none); spf=softfail (imf07.hostedemail.com: 62.72.0.81 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of cl@linux.com) smtp.mailfrom=cl@linux.com ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hostedemail.com; s=arc-20220608; t=1713978879; h=from:from:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=rDB3NkjXOyJuDKezXso3CUhOajSsKvotXz6koqeQjEM=; b=HzYNW2pbQLTENwgj4YCmzok3ALuR/fC0jH+zZVuZAbxcXAygyn1zCeTN7YGacyPu2xVwWN zK2Yjk/6IXrW8/UZx/Hak1vzGWKUGYgVCvsDYFMWINp2OD8qek9KyvL72HDJg1ENoDbwXr 7GPcuF6EnpTCraYpbrK/BILKPRfO1IA= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; imf07.hostedemail.com; dkim=none; dmarc=fail reason="No valid SPF, No valid DKIM" header.from=linux.com (policy=none); spf=softfail (imf07.hostedemail.com: 62.72.0.81 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of cl@linux.com) smtp.mailfrom=cl@linux.com ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-20220608; d=hostedemail.com; t=1713978879; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=W2xtOdnnto1ubfDSqxuK4tPeaFngK9Hn726xeaNVlemaEASCgn+7mBuspiDSQjATF+316M 2JEuahygywcP+6lFlxN+obwtl8NqZiJfHIwsS9q7oOWT4dP4A7EPZU3dGfXH4nd2L8wPQo QhHxjls9vCa2J888RgGdJcVVYjh8yGw= Received: by gentwo.org (Postfix, from userid 1003) id 143824093E; Wed, 24 Apr 2024 10:04:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gentwo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1315B4022F; Wed, 24 Apr 2024 10:04:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 10:04:38 -0700 (PDT) From: "Christoph Lameter (Ampere)" To: Hyunmin Lee cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Pekka Enberg , David Rientjes , Joonsoo Kim , Andrew Morton , Vlastimil Babka , Roman Gushchin , Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>, Jeungwoo Yoo , Sangyun Kim , Gwan-gyeong Mun Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] mm/slub: create kmalloc 96 and 192 caches regardless cache size order In-Reply-To: <20240424140422.12780-2-hyunminlr@gmail.com> Message-ID: <8e4cebb2-c244-de0b-1df6-91a8276cdf3b@linux.com> References: <20240424140422.12780-1-hyunminlr@gmail.com> <20240424140422.12780-2-hyunminlr@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Rspamd-Server: rspam04 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 0F33B4000E X-Rspam-User: X-Stat-Signature: 8kwxq3nk5w6h37r48nyb9ze71di7uiy1 X-HE-Tag: 1713978878-559163 X-HE-Meta: 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 82Nqk8+R EjvQG4TfOjx6Ckw1JiGOmbsHKiyvz5Q7upj81IF63OgJom+YZnyYNlum35l9yvdgBkzc3BCXSltB1EVztjnP8zCCF2cWFJVQ2vtHNqG9qIekngyAuvOnrs0HxQUxZoJ6xWnCc2q7aWwV43DuQ8maUChTynYKzxAK2r4/8LapNQU5U+DfLUkqDzVoXZGAlk/BGoOwlcB4apALlsPIgkKVAJU65d77BmDRGWThP2wMFCu8Phr9Ev31CyPc5I8qPfcGy2UA/ELHIKkVotPNY0K6IENEdm6AONHtcb4Im X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Wed, 24 Apr 2024, Hyunmin Lee wrote: > For SLAB the kmalloc caches needed to be created in ascending sizes in > order. However, the constraint is not necessary anymore because SLAB has > been removed and SLUB doesn't need to comply with the constraint. Thus, > kmalloc 96 and 192 caches can be created after the other size kmalloc > caches are created instead of checking every time to find their order to > be created. Also, this change could prevent engineers from being confused > by the removed constraint. Reviewed-by: Christoph Lameter