From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
To: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>,
Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
"Du, Fan" <fan.du@intel.com>,
"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/10] Another Approach to Use PMEM as NUMA Node
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 13:14:56 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8ff09d53-1b74-2efb-98b2-ce10eaeffed9@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c3690a19-e2a6-7db7-b146-b08aa9b22854@linux.alibaba.com>
On 3/27/19 11:59 AM, Yang Shi wrote:
> In real production environment we don't know what kind of applications
> would end up on PMEM (DRAM may be full, allocation fall back to PMEM)
> then have unexpected performance degradation. I understand to have
> mempolicy to choose to avoid it. But, there might be hundreds or
> thousands of applications running on the machine, it sounds not that
> feasible to me to have each single application set mempolicy to avoid it.
Maybe not manually, but it's entirely possible to automate this.
It would be trivial to get help from an orchestrator, or even systemd to
get apps launched with a particular policy. Or, even a *shell* that
launches apps to have a particular policy.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-27 20:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-23 4:44 [RFC PATCH 0/10] Another Approach to Use PMEM as NUMA Node Yang Shi
2019-03-23 4:44 ` [PATCH 01/10] mm: control memory placement by nodemask for two tier main memory Yang Shi
2019-03-23 17:21 ` Dan Williams
2019-03-25 19:28 ` Yang Shi
2019-03-25 23:18 ` Dan Williams
2019-03-25 23:36 ` Yang Shi
2019-03-25 23:42 ` Dan Williams
2019-03-23 4:44 ` [PATCH 02/10] mm: mempolicy: introduce MPOL_HYBRID policy Yang Shi
2019-03-23 4:44 ` [PATCH 03/10] mm: mempolicy: promote page to DRAM for MPOL_HYBRID Yang Shi
2019-03-23 4:44 ` [PATCH 04/10] mm: numa: promote pages to DRAM when it is accessed twice Yang Shi
2019-03-29 0:31 ` kbuild test robot
2019-03-23 4:44 ` [PATCH 05/10] mm: page_alloc: make find_next_best_node could skip DRAM node Yang Shi
2019-03-23 4:44 ` [PATCH 06/10] mm: vmscan: demote anon DRAM pages to PMEM node Yang Shi
2019-03-23 6:03 ` Zi Yan
2019-03-25 21:49 ` Yang Shi
2019-03-24 22:20 ` Keith Busch
2019-03-25 19:49 ` Yang Shi
2019-03-27 0:35 ` Keith Busch
2019-03-27 3:41 ` Yang Shi
2019-03-27 13:08 ` Keith Busch
2019-03-27 17:00 ` Zi Yan
2019-03-27 17:05 ` Dave Hansen
2019-03-27 17:48 ` Zi Yan
2019-03-27 18:00 ` Dave Hansen
2019-03-27 20:37 ` Zi Yan
2019-03-27 20:42 ` Dave Hansen
2019-03-28 21:59 ` Yang Shi
2019-03-28 22:45 ` Keith Busch
2019-03-23 4:44 ` [PATCH 07/10] mm: vmscan: add page demotion counter Yang Shi
2019-03-23 4:44 ` [PATCH 08/10] mm: numa: add page promotion counter Yang Shi
2019-03-23 4:44 ` [PATCH 09/10] doc: add description for MPOL_HYBRID mode Yang Shi
2019-03-23 4:44 ` [PATCH 10/10] doc: elaborate the PMEM allocation rule Yang Shi
2019-03-25 16:15 ` [RFC PATCH 0/10] Another Approach to Use PMEM as NUMA Node Brice Goglin
2019-03-25 16:56 ` Dan Williams
2019-03-25 17:45 ` Brice Goglin
2019-03-25 19:29 ` Dan Williams
2019-03-25 23:09 ` Brice Goglin
2019-03-25 23:37 ` Dan Williams
2019-03-26 12:19 ` Jonathan Cameron
2019-03-25 20:04 ` Yang Shi
2019-03-26 13:58 ` Michal Hocko
2019-03-26 18:33 ` Yang Shi
2019-03-26 18:37 ` Michal Hocko
2019-03-27 2:58 ` Yang Shi
2019-03-27 9:01 ` Michal Hocko
2019-03-27 17:34 ` Dan Williams
2019-03-27 18:59 ` Yang Shi
2019-03-27 20:09 ` Michal Hocko
2019-03-28 2:09 ` Yang Shi
2019-03-28 6:58 ` Michal Hocko
2019-03-28 18:58 ` Yang Shi
2019-03-28 19:12 ` Michal Hocko
2019-03-28 19:40 ` Yang Shi
2019-03-28 20:40 ` Michal Hocko
2019-03-28 8:21 ` Dan Williams
2019-03-27 20:14 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2019-03-27 20:35 ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-03-27 20:40 ` Dave Hansen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8ff09d53-1b74-2efb-98b2-ce10eaeffed9@intel.com \
--to=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=fan.du@intel.com \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).