linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
To: Christopher Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	selinux@vger.kernel.org, Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>,
	Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>,
	Eric Paris <eparis@parisplace.org>,
	"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] signal: Make flush_sigqueue() use free_q to release memory
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 14:12:01 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <93523469-48b0-07c8-54fd-300678af3163@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <01000169a686689d-bc18fecd-95e1-4b3e-8cd5-dad1b1c570cc-000000@email.amazonses.com>

On 03/22/2019 01:50 PM, Christopher Lameter wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Mar 2019, Waiman Long wrote:
>
>> I am looking forward to it.
> There is also alrady rcu being used in these paths. kfree_rcu() would not
> be enough? It is an estalished mechanism that is mature and well
> understood.
>
In this case, the memory objects are from kmem caches, so they can't
freed using kfree_rcu().

There are certainly overhead using the kfree_rcu(), or a
kfree_rcu()-like mechanism. Also I think the actual freeing is done at
SoftIRQ context which can be a problem if there are too many memory
objects to free.

I think what Oleg is trying to do is probably the most efficient way.

Cheers,
Longman



  reply	other threads:[~2019-03-22 18:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-21 21:45 [PATCH 0/4] Signal: Fix hard lockup problem in flush_sigqueue() Waiman Long
2019-03-21 21:45 ` [PATCH 1/4] mm: Implement kmem objects freeing queue Waiman Long
2019-03-22 17:47   ` Christopher Lameter
2019-03-21 21:45 ` [PATCH 2/4] signal: Make flush_sigqueue() use free_q to release memory Waiman Long
2019-03-22  1:52   ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-03-22 11:16     ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-03-22 16:10       ` Waiman Long
2019-03-22 17:50         ` Christopher Lameter
2019-03-22 18:12           ` Waiman Long [this message]
2019-03-22 19:39             ` Christopher Lameter
2019-03-22 19:59               ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-03-25 14:15                 ` Christopher Lameter
2019-03-25 15:26                   ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-03-25 16:16                     ` Christopher Lameter
2019-03-26 13:36                   ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-03-26 13:29           ` Oleg Nesterov
2019-03-21 21:45 ` [PATCH 3/4] signal: Add free_uid_to_q() Waiman Long
2019-03-21 21:45 ` [PATCH 4/4] mm: Do periodic rescheduling when freeing objects in kmem_free_up_q() Waiman Long
2019-03-21 22:00   ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-22 14:35     ` Waiman Long
2019-03-22 10:15 ` [PATCH 0/4] Signal: Fix hard lockup problem in flush_sigqueue() Matthew Wilcox
2019-03-22 11:49   ` Oleg Nesterov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=93523469-48b0-07c8-54fd-300678af3163@redhat.com \
    --to=longman@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=eparis@parisplace.org \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
    --cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).