linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
To: rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: paulmck <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Michael Jeanson <mjeanson@efficios.com>,
	 linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	 Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>,
	 Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>,
	 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	 Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	 Michel Lespinasse <walken@google.com>,
	 Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com>,
	 Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>, linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	 Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] tracepoints: Add helper to test if tracepoint is enabled in a header
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 11:30:06 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <965650354.69699.1601047806662.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200925111415.60f5334c@oasis.local.home>

----- On Sep 25, 2020, at 11:14 AM, rostedt rostedt@goodmis.org wrote:

> On Fri, 25 Sep 2020 10:41:56 -0400 (EDT)
> Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> wrote:
> 
>> With the current dependencies of tracepoint.h, I would argue that we should
>> only do the trampoline work-around for cases where there is an unavoidable
>> circular dependency, like the case of msr.h. For other headers which don't
>> have circular dependency issues with tracepoint.h, we should use the usual
>> tracepoint instrumentation because not having the trampoline provides better
>> tracing (on) speed and reduces (slightly) code size.
> 
> Well, for now, I'm going to add the helper function and have the header
> use cases use that.
> 
> A while back ago I had patches that moves the DO_TRACE() work into a
> separate function and with that we probably could have let all
> tracepoints be in headers (as they would all just do a function call to
> the trace algorithm that does the rest of the work). But you balked at
> that because of the added overhead with tracing on.
> 
> Anyway, I don't see any issues with the current patch set as is
> (besides the documentation fix, which I already updated locally). And
> will add this to my queue for linux-next.

The only thing I would change in the documentation is to word this as
"here is a trampoline trick which can be used to work-around rare cases
of tracepoint header circular dependency issues" rather than "always use
this when instrumenting a header".

Thanks,

Mathieu

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com


  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-25 15:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-24 17:09 [PATCH 0/2] tracing/mm: Add tracepoint_enabled() helper function for headers Steven Rostedt
2020-09-24 17:09 ` [PATCH 1/2] tracepoints: Add helper to test if tracepoint is enabled in a header Steven Rostedt
2020-09-24 17:42   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-09-24 18:19     ` Axel Rasmussen
2020-09-24 18:27       ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-09-24 18:30     ` Steven Rostedt
2020-09-24 19:08       ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-09-24 19:35         ` Steven Rostedt
2020-09-24 19:40           ` Steven Rostedt
2020-09-24 20:25             ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-09-24 20:05           ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-09-24 20:13             ` Steven Rostedt
2020-09-24 20:27               ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-09-24 20:33                 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-09-25 14:41                   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-09-25 15:14                     ` Steven Rostedt
2020-09-25 15:30                       ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2020-09-25 16:26                         ` Steven Rostedt
2020-09-25 17:05                           ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-09-24 20:04         ` Axel Rasmussen
2020-09-24 17:09 ` [PATCH 2/2] mm/page_ref: Convert the open coded tracepoint enabled to the new helper Steven Rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=965650354.69699.1601047806662.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com \
    --to=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
    --cc=daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com \
    --cc=dbueso@suse.de \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=laoar.shao@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mjeanson@efficios.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=walken@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).