linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>, Oliver Glitta <glittao@gmail.com>
Cc: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
	<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
	KUnit Development <kunit-dev@googlegroups.com>,
	Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] mm/slub, kunit: add a KUnit test for SLUB debugging functionality
Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 12:30:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <99d79722-ea94-7775-8ac2-5957b42060b2@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANpmjNNnS5FgPnNkGWG2ae_ybsr=Wa_bzNba7RruOM+1kgOzfw@mail.gmail.com>

On 5/11/21 5:16 PM, Marco Elver wrote:
> On Tue, 11 May 2021 at 17:07, <glittao@gmail.com> wrote:
>> From: Oliver Glitta <glittao@gmail.com>
>>
>> SLUB has resiliency_test() function which is hidden behind #ifdef
>> SLUB_RESILIENCY_TEST that is not part of Kconfig, so nobody
>> runs it. KUnit should be a proper replacement for it.
>>
>> Try changing byte in redzone after allocation and changing
>> pointer to next free node, first byte, 50th byte and redzone
>> byte. Check if validation finds errors.
>>
>> There are several differences from the original resiliency test:
>> Tests create own caches with known state instead of corrupting
>> shared kmalloc caches.
>>
>> The corruption of freepointer uses correct offset, the original
>> resiliency test got broken with freepointer changes.
>>
>> Scratch changing random byte test, because it does not have
>> meaning in this form where we need deterministic results.
>>
>> Add new option CONFIG_SLUB_KUNIT_TEST in Kconfig.
>> Tests next_pointer, first_word and clobber_50th_byte do not run
>> with KASAN option on. Because the test deliberately modifies non-allocated
>> objects.
>>
>> Use kunit_resource to count errors in cache and silence bug reports.
>> Count error whenever slab_bug() or slab_fix() is called or when
>> the count of pages is wrong.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Oliver Glitta <glittao@gmail.com>

Reviewed-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>

> I think I had already reviewed v4, and the changes here are fine:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
> 
> Others who had reviewed/acked v4, probably need to re-ack/review.
> Note, I think if you addressed the comments and didn't change much
> else, you can typically carry the acks/reviews, unless the other
> person changed their mind explicitly.

FTR, besides me and Marco, v4 had also:

Acked-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>


  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-12 10:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-11 15:07 [PATCH v5 1/3] kunit: make test->lock irq safe glittao
2021-05-11 15:07 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] mm/slub, kunit: add a KUnit test for SLUB debugging functionality glittao
2021-05-11 15:16   ` Marco Elver
2021-05-12 10:30     ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2021-05-12 12:24     ` Oliver Glitta
2021-05-12 14:06   ` [PATCH] mm/slub, kunit: add a KUnit test for SLUB debugging functionality-fix glittao
2021-05-13  4:44   ` [PATCH v5 2/3] mm/slub, kunit: add a KUnit test for SLUB debugging functionality Andrew Morton
2021-05-13  8:54     ` Marco Elver
2021-05-13  9:32     ` Oliver Glitta
2021-05-11 15:07 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] slub: remove resiliency_test() function glittao
2021-05-12 10:28 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] kunit: make test->lock irq safe Vlastimil Babka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=99d79722-ea94-7775-8ac2-5957b42060b2@suse.cz \
    --to=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=brendanhiggins@google.com \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=dlatypov@google.com \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=glittao@gmail.com \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).