From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
James Bottomley <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, x86@kernel.org,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] mm: add MAP_EXCLUSIVE to create exclusive user mappings
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 15:55:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9c844300-e151-97a0-7223-a6d341d0d75e@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1572171452-7958-2-git-send-email-rppt@kernel.org>
On 27.10.19 11:17, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
>
> The mappings created with MAP_EXCLUSIVE are visible only in the context of
> the owning process and can be used by applications to store secret
> information that will not be visible not only to other processes but to the
> kernel as well.
>
> The pages in these mappings are removed from the kernel direct map and
> marked with PG_user_exclusive flag. When the exclusive area is unmapped,
> the pages are mapped back into the direct map.
>
> The MAP_EXCLUSIVE flag implies MAP_POPULATE and MAP_LOCKED.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/mm/fault.c | 14 ++++++++++
> fs/proc/task_mmu.c | 1 +
> include/linux/mm.h | 9 +++++++
> include/linux/page-flags.h | 7 +++++
> include/linux/page_excl.h | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/trace/events/mmflags.h | 9 ++++++-
> include/uapi/asm-generic/mman-common.h | 1 +
> kernel/fork.c | 3 ++-
> mm/Kconfig | 3 +++
> mm/gup.c | 8 ++++++
> mm/memory.c | 3 +++
> mm/mmap.c | 16 +++++++++++
> mm/page_alloc.c | 5 ++++
> 13 files changed, 126 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 include/linux/page_excl.h
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
> index 9ceacd1..8f73a75 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
> #include <linux/context_tracking.h> /* exception_enter(), ... */
> #include <linux/uaccess.h> /* faulthandler_disabled() */
> #include <linux/efi.h> /* efi_recover_from_page_fault()*/
> +#include <linux/page_excl.h> /* page_is_user_exclusive() */
> #include <linux/mm_types.h>
>
> #include <asm/cpufeature.h> /* boot_cpu_has, ... */
> @@ -1218,6 +1219,13 @@ static int fault_in_kernel_space(unsigned long address)
> return address >= TASK_SIZE_MAX;
> }
>
> +static bool fault_in_user_exclusive_page(unsigned long address)
> +{
> + struct page *page = virt_to_page(address);
> +
> + return page_is_user_exclusive(page);
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Called for all faults where 'address' is part of the kernel address
> * space. Might get called for faults that originate from *code* that
> @@ -1261,6 +1269,12 @@ do_kern_addr_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long hw_error_code,
> if (spurious_kernel_fault(hw_error_code, address))
> return;
>
> + /* FIXME: warn and handle gracefully */
> + if (unlikely(fault_in_user_exclusive_page(address))) {
> + pr_err("page fault in user exclusive page at %lx", address);
> + force_sig_fault(SIGSEGV, SEGV_MAPERR, (void __user *)address);
> + }
> +
> /* kprobes don't want to hook the spurious faults: */
> if (kprobe_page_fault(regs, X86_TRAP_PF))
> return;
> diff --git a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> index 9442631..99e14d1 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> @@ -655,6 +655,7 @@ static void show_smap_vma_flags(struct seq_file *m, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> #ifdef CONFIG_X86_INTEL_MPX
> [ilog2(VM_MPX)] = "mp",
> #endif
> + [ilog2(VM_EXCLUSIVE)] = "xl",
> [ilog2(VM_LOCKED)] = "lo",
> [ilog2(VM_IO)] = "io",
> [ilog2(VM_SEQ_READ)] = "sr",
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> index cc29227..9c43375 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> @@ -298,11 +298,13 @@ extern unsigned int kobjsize(const void *objp);
> #define VM_HIGH_ARCH_BIT_2 34 /* bit only usable on 64-bit architectures */
> #define VM_HIGH_ARCH_BIT_3 35 /* bit only usable on 64-bit architectures */
> #define VM_HIGH_ARCH_BIT_4 36 /* bit only usable on 64-bit architectures */
> +#define VM_HIGH_ARCH_BIT_5 37 /* bit only usable on 64-bit architectures */
> #define VM_HIGH_ARCH_0 BIT(VM_HIGH_ARCH_BIT_0)
> #define VM_HIGH_ARCH_1 BIT(VM_HIGH_ARCH_BIT_1)
> #define VM_HIGH_ARCH_2 BIT(VM_HIGH_ARCH_BIT_2)
> #define VM_HIGH_ARCH_3 BIT(VM_HIGH_ARCH_BIT_3)
> #define VM_HIGH_ARCH_4 BIT(VM_HIGH_ARCH_BIT_4)
> +#define VM_HIGH_ARCH_5 BIT(VM_HIGH_ARCH_BIT_5)
> #endif /* CONFIG_ARCH_USES_HIGH_VMA_FLAGS */
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_PKEYS
> @@ -340,6 +342,12 @@ extern unsigned int kobjsize(const void *objp);
> # define VM_MPX VM_NONE
> #endif
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_USES_HIGH_VMA_FLAGS
> +# define VM_EXCLUSIVE VM_HIGH_ARCH_5
> +#else
> +# define VM_EXCLUSIVE VM_NONE
> +#endif
> +
> #ifndef VM_GROWSUP
> # define VM_GROWSUP VM_NONE
> #endif
> @@ -2594,6 +2602,7 @@ struct page *follow_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
> #define FOLL_ANON 0x8000 /* don't do file mappings */
> #define FOLL_LONGTERM 0x10000 /* mapping lifetime is indefinite: see below */
> #define FOLL_SPLIT_PMD 0x20000 /* split huge pmd before returning */
> +#define FOLL_EXCLUSIVE 0x40000 /* mapping is exclusive to owning mm */
>
> /*
> * NOTE on FOLL_LONGTERM:
> diff --git a/include/linux/page-flags.h b/include/linux/page-flags.h
> index f91cb88..32d0aee 100644
> --- a/include/linux/page-flags.h
> +++ b/include/linux/page-flags.h
> @@ -131,6 +131,9 @@ enum pageflags {
> PG_young,
> PG_idle,
> #endif
> +#if defined(CONFIG_EXCLUSIVE_USER_PAGES)
> + PG_user_exclusive,
> +#endif
Last time I tried to introduce a new page flag I learned that this is
very much frowned upon. Best you can usually do is reuse another flag -
if valid in that context.
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-28 14:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-27 10:17 [PATCH RFC] mm: add MAP_EXCLUSIVE to create exclusive user mappings Mike Rapoport
2019-10-27 10:17 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-10-28 12:31 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2019-10-28 13:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-10-28 13:16 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2019-10-28 13:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-10-28 19:59 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2019-10-28 21:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-10-29 17:27 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2019-10-30 10:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-10-30 15:35 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-10-30 18:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-10-30 18:52 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-10-30 17:48 ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2019-10-30 17:58 ` Dave Hansen
2019-10-30 18:01 ` Dave Hansen
2019-10-29 5:43 ` Dan Williams
2019-10-29 6:43 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2019-10-29 8:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-10-29 11:00 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2019-10-29 12:39 ` AMD TLB errata, (Was: [PATCH RFC] mm: add MAP_EXCLUSIVE to create exclusive user mappings) Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-15 14:12 ` Tom Lendacky
2019-11-15 14:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-10-29 19:43 ` [PATCH RFC] mm: add MAP_EXCLUSIVE to create exclusive user mappings Dan Williams
2019-10-29 20:07 ` Dave Hansen
2019-10-29 7:08 ` Christopher Lameter
2019-10-29 8:55 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-10-29 10:12 ` Christopher Lameter
2019-10-30 7:11 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-10-30 12:09 ` Christopher Lameter
2019-10-28 14:55 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2019-10-28 17:12 ` Dave Hansen
2019-10-28 17:32 ` Sean Christopherson
2019-10-28 18:08 ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-10-29 9:28 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-10-29 9:19 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-10-28 18:02 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-10-29 11:02 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-10-30 8:15 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-10-30 8:19 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-10-31 19:16 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-10-31 21:52 ` Dan Williams
2019-10-27 10:30 ` Florian Weimer
2019-10-27 11:00 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-10-28 20:23 ` Florian Weimer
2019-10-29 9:01 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-10-28 20:44 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-10-29 9:32 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-10-29 17:00 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-10-30 8:40 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-10-30 21:28 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-10-31 7:21 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-12-05 15:34 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-12-08 14:10 ` [PATCH] mm: extend memfd with ability to create secret memory kbuild test robot
2019-10-29 11:25 ` [PATCH RFC] mm: add MAP_EXCLUSIVE to create exclusive user mappings Reshetova, Elena
2019-10-29 15:13 ` Tycho Andersen
2019-10-29 17:03 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-10-29 17:37 ` Alan Cox
2019-10-29 17:43 ` James Bottomley
2019-10-29 18:10 ` Andy Lutomirski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9c844300-e151-97a0-7223-a6d341d0d75e@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).