From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 601AEC2BA19 for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 17:58:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24244206E9 for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 17:58:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lca.pw header.i=@lca.pw header.b="UM9XOL7v" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 24244206E9 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=lca.pw Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id BF3A08E000D; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 13:58:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id BA4718E0006; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 13:58:30 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id A92968E000D; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 13:58:30 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0177.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.177]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B2DA8E0006 for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 13:58:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin02.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7518140C3 for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 17:58:30 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 76689076380.02.maid70_1008ed090a141 X-HE-Tag: maid70_1008ed090a141 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 3862 Received: from mail-qv1-f65.google.com (mail-qv1-f65.google.com [209.85.219.65]) by imf47.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 17:58:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qv1-f65.google.com with SMTP id k9so5243436qvw.7 for ; Thu, 09 Apr 2020 10:58:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lca.pw; s=google; h=content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version:subject:date:message-id :references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=vbNs4CiSAfqXtDc3PCTnCp4GWX4m5dGAR4EoeOkQXUw=; b=UM9XOL7vXw5YSDBrMqz1x5fbcySKBJPdcsGdK3G2BJ0HqC9qv+hf9slg74aPPBSGVt dWVpnEb2iFLsR3tMVpiwkXnEfLBQlixQeVzoaRqb8OftsbFS1z6oqaZUt5iijh8CBmVa 5/7pZdIQoiOUGdSzlQw3Pcm9tVOHfFV1OtXxboM3HQxjRc5ItOJ8VyO0b39yy0FMuSDE Gvq1/k6PB54y/pPH4dz0RiaYpvkS2lMxOoZ6d6/CvPvQUBM/vg01hFqEY828coijVZLt bbfkmtMOisih9qOEkCB0mupjcrVt3roiDi56oBl/lah1LSsCj963Veb0DjFqBrXX9VOm 616A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version :subject:date:message-id:references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=vbNs4CiSAfqXtDc3PCTnCp4GWX4m5dGAR4EoeOkQXUw=; b=nZnDV1XMZp0YO4gEuOrB2+qhKZC8i2ADV80ytJMhVcFyHFtp8VtLQJ+tYx6IxcUBVg 9OQk1Mw8SM+NAJDoA3y0s5KtsYaTf4PNPxaKVHv7/W+uhBWbpuiMueJXHfKbFiYSMnPX 5XJHl1DcUsyf65b18U/5Vy/Pudpgj7+aKgTsD3tpvVOZMeTunTKoyqYLz3cednu1lWPZ k1ckisZRFw9bM2AzPgse+jojLBY/Hr4F/gBM16e7u6fIw6Hzt1KLoVUGfyeF23RhoFqx x1q1koDjpNoYwz7rKxqU3vqyyK5+FPgsLD1MK9Bk4aw6UuFCADYH/2DLHBy0WDleupZx AKIQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0Pua6YSwqjRdgJE4Ss57auAZOMcQi65GAhh5Y9MuQRttlWy0/B796 CpZG2ho6UH/FOosNXswO6RohBpfUpNEEjQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJMAtakUPjlZdlWSuPXqIajVjJzQSZXFNNU6P6KqrKcxIi2dyKf4zVuhyyh1tJlmTDmVJkG/w== X-Received: by 2002:ad4:49c6:: with SMTP id j6mr1367309qvy.68.1586455108881; Thu, 09 Apr 2020 10:58:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.183] (pool-71-184-117-43.bstnma.fios.verizon.net. [71.184.117.43]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e10sm9209798qtj.76.2020.04.09.10.58.27 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 09 Apr 2020 10:58:28 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: Qian Cai Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] mm: Two small fixes for recent syzbot reports Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2020 13:58:27 -0400 Message-Id: References: Cc: Dmitry Vyukov , Stephen Rothwell , Andrew Morton , Peter Xu , LKML , Linux-MM In-Reply-To: To: Linus Torvalds X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (17D50) X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: > On Apr 9, 2020, at 1:05 PM, Linus Torvalds = wrote: >=20 > Well, probably not very many people outside of robots. >=20 > Which is fine, but is also why I'd like robot failures to then be a big de= al. Agree to make a big deal part. My point is that when kicking trees of linux-= next, it also could reduce the exposure of many patches (which could be bad)= to linux-next and miss valuable early testing either from robots or human. T= hus, the same mistakes could happen again because maintainers could simply p= ush those little or none linux-next exposure patches to mainline with no res= trictions. There is a balance to strike.