From: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: "Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
"James Morris" <jmorris@namei.org>,
"Sasha Levin" <sashal@kernel.org>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Linux MM" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Michal Hocko" <mhocko@suse.com>,
"Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"Keith Busch" <keith.busch@intel.com>,
"Vishal L Verma" <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
"Dave Jiang" <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
"Ross Zwisler" <zwisler@kernel.org>,
"Tom Lendacky" <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>,
"Fengguang Wu" <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
"Borislav Petkov" <bp@suse.de>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Yaowei Bai" <baiyaowei@cmss.chinamobile.com>,
"Takashi Iwai" <tiwai@suse.de>,
"Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com>,
"David Hildenbrand" <david@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [v5 2/3] mm/hotplug: make remove_memory() interface useable
Date: Mon, 6 May 2019 14:18:20 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+CK2bAfjXCtRRV2DWy8huCvJ-y0L5cMvOh+9CS40WZfhx-aeg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cf793443-c14a-a1e0-856e-15e416c7f874@intel.com>
On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 2:04 PM Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> wrote:
>
> On 5/6/19 11:01 AM, Dan Williams wrote:
> >>> +void __remove_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size)
> >>> {
> >>> +
> >>> + /*
> >>> + * trigger BUG() is some memory is not offlined prior to calling this
> >>> + * function
> >>> + */
> >>> + if (try_remove_memory(nid, start, size))
> >>> + BUG();
> >>> +}
> >> Could we call this remove_offline_memory()? That way, it makes _some_
> >> sense why we would BUG() if the memory isn't offline.
> > Please WARN() instead of BUG() because failing to remove memory should
> > not be system fatal.
>
> That is my preference as well. But, the existing code BUG()s, so I'm
> OK-ish with this staying for the moment until we have a better handle on
> what all the callers do if this fails.
Yes, this is the reason why I BUG() here. The current code does this,
and I was not sure what would happen if we simply continue executing.
Of course, I would prefer to return failure, so the callers can act
appropriately, but let's make one thing at a time, this should not be
part of this series.
Thank you,
Pasha
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-06 18:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-02 18:43 [v5 0/3] "Hotremove" persistent memory Pavel Tatashin
2019-05-02 18:43 ` [v5 1/3] device-dax: fix memory and resource leak if hotplug fails Pavel Tatashin
2019-05-02 18:43 ` [v5 2/3] mm/hotplug: make remove_memory() interface useable Pavel Tatashin
2019-05-03 10:06 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-05-06 17:57 ` Dave Hansen
2019-05-06 18:01 ` Dan Williams
2019-05-06 18:04 ` Dave Hansen
2019-05-06 18:18 ` Pavel Tatashin [this message]
2019-05-17 18:10 ` Pavel Tatashin
2019-05-06 18:13 ` Pavel Tatashin
2019-05-02 18:43 ` [v5 3/3] device-dax: "Hotremove" persistent memory that is used like normal RAM Pavel Tatashin
2019-05-02 20:50 ` [v5 0/3] "Hotremove" persistent memory Verma, Vishal L
2019-05-02 21:44 ` Pavel Tatashin
2019-05-02 22:29 ` Verma, Vishal L
2019-05-02 22:36 ` Pavel Tatashin
2019-05-03 21:48 ` Verma, Vishal L
2019-05-15 18:11 ` Pavel Tatashin
2019-05-16 0:42 ` Dan Williams
2019-05-16 7:10 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-05-17 14:09 ` Pavel Tatashin
2019-05-20 7:57 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CA+CK2bAfjXCtRRV2DWy8huCvJ-y0L5cMvOh+9CS40WZfhx-aeg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=baiyaowei@cmss.chinamobile.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
--cc=zwisler@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).