From: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
To: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Cc: Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.ibm.com>,
"linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Kernel Team <Kernel-team@fb.com>,
Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>,
stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/28] The new cgroup slab memory controller
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 20:31:05 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+CK2bDDToW=Q5RgeWkoN3_rUr3pyWGVb9MraTzM+DM3OZ+tdg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200813000416.GA1592467@carbon.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 8:04 PM Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 07:16:08PM -0400, Pavel Tatashin wrote:
> > Guys,
> >
> > There is a convoluted deadlock that I just root caused, and that is
> > fixed by this work (at least based on my code inspection it appears to
> > be fixed); but the deadlock exists in older and stable kernels, and I
> > am not sure whether to create a separate patch for it, or backport
> > this whole thing.
>
Hi Roman,
> Hi Pavel,
>
> wow, it's a quite complicated deadlock. Thank you for providing
> a perfect analysis!
Thank you, it indeed took me a while to fully grasp the deadlock.
>
> Unfortunately, backporting the whole new slab controller isn't an option:
> it's way too big and invasive.
This is what I thought as well, this is why I want to figure out what
is the best way forward.
> Do you already have a standalone fix?
Not yet, I do not have a standalone fix. I suspect the best fix would
be to address fix css_killed_work_fn() stack so we never have:
cgroup_mutex -> mem_hotplug_lock. Either decoupling them or reverse
the order would work. If you have suggestions since you worked on this
code recently, please let me know.
Thank you,
Pasha
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> >
> > Thread #1: Hot-removes memory
> > device_offline
> > memory_subsys_offline
> > offline_pages
> > __offline_pages
> > mem_hotplug_lock <- write access
> > waits for Thread #3 refcnt for pfn 9e5113 to get to 1 so it can
> > migrate it.
> >
> > Thread #2: ccs killer kthread
> > css_killed_work_fn
> > cgroup_mutex <- Grab this Mutex
> > mem_cgroup_css_offline
> > memcg_offline_kmem.part
> > memcg_deactivate_kmem_caches
> > get_online_mems
> > mem_hotplug_lock <- waits for Thread#1 to get read access
> >
> > Thread #3: crashing userland program
> > do_coredump
> > elf_core_dump
> > get_dump_page() -> get page with pfn#9e5113, and increment refcnt
> > dump_emit
> > __kernel_write
> > __vfs_write
> > new_sync_write
> > pipe_write
> > pipe_wait -> waits for Thread #4 systemd-coredump to
> > read the pipe
> >
> > Thread #4: systemd-coredump
> > ksys_read
> > vfs_read
> > __vfs_read
> > seq_read
> > proc_single_show
> > proc_cgroup_show
> > cgroup_mutex -> waits from Thread #2 for this lock.
>
> >
> > In Summary:
> > Thread#1 waits for Thread#3 for refcnt, Thread#3 waits for Thread#4 to
> > read pipe. Thread#4 waits for Thread#2 for cgroup_mutex lock; Thread#2
> > waits for Thread#1 for mem_hotplug_lock rwlock.
> >
> > This work appears to fix this deadlock because cgroup_mutex is not
> > called anymore before mem_hotplug_lock (unless I am missing it), as it
> > removes memcg_deactivate_kmem_caches.
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Pasha
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 9:42 PM Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 07:36:26AM +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 09:34:25AM -0800, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> > > > > The existing cgroup slab memory controller is based on the idea of
> > > > > replicating slab allocator internals for each memory cgroup.
> > > > > This approach promises a low memory overhead (one pointer per page),
> > > > > and isn't adding too much code on hot allocation and release paths.
> > > > > But is has a very serious flaw: it leads to a low slab utilization.
> > > > >
> > > > > Using a drgn* script I've got an estimation of slab utilization on
> > > > > a number of machines running different production workloads. In most
> > > > > cases it was between 45% and 65%, and the best number I've seen was
> > > > > around 85%. Turning kmem accounting off brings it to high 90s. Also
> > > > > it brings back 30-50% of slab memory. It means that the real price
> > > > > of the existing slab memory controller is way bigger than a pointer
> > > > > per page.
> > > > >
> > > > > The real reason why the existing design leads to a low slab utilization
> > > > > is simple: slab pages are used exclusively by one memory cgroup.
> > > > > If there are only few allocations of certain size made by a cgroup,
> > > > > or if some active objects (e.g. dentries) are left after the cgroup is
> > > > > deleted, or the cgroup contains a single-threaded application which is
> > > > > barely allocating any kernel objects, but does it every time on a new CPU:
> > > > > in all these cases the resulting slab utilization is very low.
> > > > > If kmem accounting is off, the kernel is able to use free space
> > > > > on slab pages for other allocations.
> > > > >
> > > > > Arguably it wasn't an issue back to days when the kmem controller was
> > > > > introduced and was an opt-in feature, which had to be turned on
> > > > > individually for each memory cgroup. But now it's turned on by default
> > > > > on both cgroup v1 and v2. And modern systemd-based systems tend to
> > > > > create a large number of cgroups.
> > > > >
> > > > > This patchset provides a new implementation of the slab memory controller,
> > > > > which aims to reach a much better slab utilization by sharing slab pages
> > > > > between multiple memory cgroups. Below is the short description of the new
> > > > > design (more details in commit messages).
> > > > >
> > > > > Accounting is performed per-object instead of per-page. Slab-related
> > > > > vmstat counters are converted to bytes. Charging is performed on page-basis,
> > > > > with rounding up and remembering leftovers.
> > > > >
> > > > > Memcg ownership data is stored in a per-slab-page vector: for each slab page
> > > > > a vector of corresponding size is allocated. To keep slab memory reparenting
> > > > > working, instead of saving a pointer to the memory cgroup directly an
> > > > > intermediate object is used. It's simply a pointer to a memcg (which can be
> > > > > easily changed to the parent) with a built-in reference counter. This scheme
> > > > > allows to reparent all allocated objects without walking them over and
> > > > > changing memcg pointer to the parent.
> > > > >
> > > > > Instead of creating an individual set of kmem_caches for each memory cgroup,
> > > > > two global sets are used: the root set for non-accounted and root-cgroup
> > > > > allocations and the second set for all other allocations. This allows to
> > > > > simplify the lifetime management of individual kmem_caches: they are
> > > > > destroyed with root counterparts. It allows to remove a good amount of code
> > > > > and make things generally simpler.
> > > > >
> > > > > The patchset* has been tested on a number of different workloads in our
> > > > > production. In all cases it saved significant amount of memory, measured
> > > > > from high hundreds of MBs to single GBs per host. On average, the size
> > > > > of slab memory has been reduced by 35-45%.
> > > >
> > > > Here are some numbers from multiple runs of sysbench and kernel compilation
> > > > with this patchset on a 10 core POWER8 host:
> > > >
> > > > ==========================================================================
> > > > Peak usage of memory.kmem.usage_in_bytes, memory.usage_in_bytes and
> > > > meminfo:Slab for Sysbench oltp_read_write with mysqld running as part
> > > > of a mem cgroup (Sampling every 5s)
> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > 5.5.0-rc7-mm1 +slab patch %reduction
> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > memory.kmem.usage_in_bytes 15859712 4456448 72
> > > > memory.usage_in_bytes 337510400 335806464 .5
> > > > Slab: (kB) 814336 607296 25
> > > >
> > > > memory.kmem.usage_in_bytes 16187392 4653056 71
> > > > memory.usage_in_bytes 318832640 300154880 5
> > > > Slab: (kB) 789888 559744 29
> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Peak usage of memory.kmem.usage_in_bytes, memory.usage_in_bytes and
> > > > meminfo:Slab for kernel compilation (make -s -j64) Compilation was
> > > > done from bash that is in a memory cgroup. (Sampling every 5s)
> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > 5.5.0-rc7-mm1 +slab patch %reduction
> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > memory.kmem.usage_in_bytes 338493440 231931904 31
> > > > memory.usage_in_bytes 7368015872 6275923968 15
> > > > Slab: (kB) 1139072 785408 31
> > > >
> > > > memory.kmem.usage_in_bytes 341835776 236453888 30
> > > > memory.usage_in_bytes 6540427264 6072893440 7
> > > > Slab: (kB) 1074304 761280 29
> > > >
> > > > memory.kmem.usage_in_bytes 340525056 233570304 31
> > > > memory.usage_in_bytes 6406209536 6177357824 3
> > > > Slab: (kB) 1244288 739712 40
> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >
> > > > Slab consumption right after boot
> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > 5.5.0-rc7-mm1 +slab patch %reduction
> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > Slab: (kB) 821888 583424 29
> > > > ==========================================================================
> > > >
> > > > Summary:
> > > >
> > > > With sysbench and kernel compilation, memory.kmem.usage_in_bytes shows
> > > > around 70% and 30% reduction consistently.
> > > >
> > > > Didn't see consistent reduction of memory.usage_in_bytes with sysbench and
> > > > kernel compilation.
> > > >
> > > > Slab usage (from /proc/meminfo) shows consistent 30% reduction and the
> > > > same is seen right after boot too.
> > >
> > > That's just perfect!
> > >
> > > memory.usage_in_bytes was most likely the same because the freed space
> > > was taken by pagecache.
> > >
> > > Thank you very much for testing!
> > >
> > > Roman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-13 0:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 84+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-27 17:34 [PATCH v2 00/28] The new cgroup slab memory controller Roman Gushchin
2020-01-27 17:34 ` [PATCH v2 01/28] mm: kmem: cleanup (__)memcg_kmem_charge_memcg() arguments Roman Gushchin
2020-01-27 17:34 ` [PATCH v2 02/28] mm: kmem: cleanup memcg_kmem_uncharge_memcg() arguments Roman Gushchin
2020-01-27 17:34 ` [PATCH v2 03/28] mm: kmem: rename memcg_kmem_(un)charge() into memcg_kmem_(un)charge_page() Roman Gushchin
2020-01-27 17:34 ` [PATCH v2 04/28] mm: kmem: switch to nr_pages in (__)memcg_kmem_charge_memcg() Roman Gushchin
2020-01-27 17:34 ` [PATCH v2 05/28] mm: memcg/slab: cache page number in memcg_(un)charge_slab() Roman Gushchin
2020-01-27 17:34 ` [PATCH v2 06/28] mm: kmem: rename (__)memcg_kmem_(un)charge_memcg() to __memcg_kmem_(un)charge() Roman Gushchin
2020-01-27 17:34 ` [PATCH v2 07/28] mm: memcg/slab: introduce mem_cgroup_from_obj() Roman Gushchin
2020-02-03 16:05 ` Johannes Weiner
2020-01-27 17:34 ` [PATCH v2 08/28] mm: fork: fix kernel_stack memcg stats for various stack implementations Roman Gushchin
2020-02-03 16:12 ` Johannes Weiner
2020-01-27 17:34 ` [PATCH v2 09/28] mm: memcg/slab: rename __mod_lruvec_slab_state() into __mod_lruvec_obj_state() Roman Gushchin
2020-02-03 16:13 ` Johannes Weiner
2020-01-27 17:34 ` [PATCH v2 10/28] mm: memcg: introduce mod_lruvec_memcg_state() Roman Gushchin
2020-02-03 17:39 ` Johannes Weiner
2020-01-27 17:34 ` [PATCH v2 11/28] mm: slub: implement SLUB version of obj_to_index() Roman Gushchin
2020-02-03 17:44 ` Johannes Weiner
2020-01-27 17:34 ` [PATCH v2 12/28] mm: vmstat: use s32 for vm_node_stat_diff in struct per_cpu_nodestat Roman Gushchin
2020-02-03 17:58 ` Johannes Weiner
2020-02-03 18:25 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-02-03 20:34 ` Johannes Weiner
2020-02-03 22:28 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-02-03 22:39 ` Johannes Weiner
2020-02-04 1:44 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-01-27 17:34 ` [PATCH v2 13/28] mm: vmstat: convert slab vmstat counter to bytes Roman Gushchin
2020-01-27 17:34 ` [PATCH v2 14/28] mm: memcontrol: decouple reference counting from page accounting Roman Gushchin
2020-01-27 17:34 ` [PATCH v2 15/28] mm: memcg/slab: obj_cgroup API Roman Gushchin
2020-02-03 19:31 ` Johannes Weiner
2020-01-27 17:34 ` [PATCH v2 16/28] mm: memcg/slab: allocate obj_cgroups for non-root slab pages Roman Gushchin
2020-02-03 18:27 ` Johannes Weiner
2020-02-03 18:34 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-02-03 20:46 ` Johannes Weiner
2020-02-03 21:19 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-02-03 22:29 ` Johannes Weiner
2020-01-27 17:34 ` [PATCH v2 17/28] mm: memcg/slab: save obj_cgroup for non-root slab objects Roman Gushchin
2020-02-03 19:53 ` Johannes Weiner
2020-01-27 17:34 ` [PATCH v2 18/28] mm: memcg/slab: charge individual slab objects instead of pages Roman Gushchin
2020-01-27 17:34 ` [PATCH v2 19/28] mm: memcg/slab: deprecate memory.kmem.slabinfo Roman Gushchin
2020-01-27 17:34 ` [PATCH v2 20/28] mm: memcg/slab: move memcg_kmem_bypass() to memcontrol.h Roman Gushchin
2020-01-27 17:34 ` [PATCH v2 21/28] mm: memcg/slab: use a single set of kmem_caches for all memory cgroups Roman Gushchin
2020-02-03 19:50 ` Johannes Weiner
2020-02-03 20:58 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-02-03 22:17 ` Johannes Weiner
2020-02-03 22:38 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-02-04 1:15 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-02-04 2:47 ` Johannes Weiner
2020-02-04 4:35 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-02-04 18:41 ` Johannes Weiner
2020-02-05 15:58 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-01-27 17:34 ` [PATCH v2 22/28] mm: memcg/slab: simplify memcg cache creation Roman Gushchin
2020-01-27 17:34 ` [PATCH v2 23/28] mm: memcg/slab: deprecate memcg_kmem_get_cache() Roman Gushchin
2020-01-27 17:34 ` [PATCH v2 24/28] mm: memcg/slab: deprecate slab_root_caches Roman Gushchin
2020-01-27 17:34 ` [PATCH v2 25/28] mm: memcg/slab: remove redundant check in memcg_accumulate_slabinfo() Roman Gushchin
2020-01-27 17:34 ` [PATCH v2 26/28] tools/cgroup: add slabinfo.py tool Roman Gushchin
2020-01-27 17:34 ` [PATCH v2 27/28] tools/cgroup: make slabinfo.py compatible with new slab controller Roman Gushchin
2020-01-30 2:17 ` Bharata B Rao
2020-01-30 2:44 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-01-31 22:24 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-02-12 5:21 ` Bharata B Rao
2020-02-12 20:42 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-01-27 17:34 ` [PATCH v2 28/28] kselftests: cgroup: add kernel memory accounting tests Roman Gushchin
2020-01-30 2:06 ` [PATCH v2 00/28] The new cgroup slab memory controller Bharata B Rao
2020-01-30 2:41 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-08-12 23:16 ` Pavel Tatashin
2020-08-12 23:18 ` Pavel Tatashin
2020-08-13 0:04 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-08-13 0:31 ` Pavel Tatashin [this message]
2020-08-28 16:47 ` Pavel Tatashin
2020-09-01 5:28 ` Bharata B Rao
2020-09-01 12:52 ` Pavel Tatashin
2020-09-02 6:23 ` Bharata B Rao
2020-09-02 12:34 ` Pavel Tatashin
2020-09-02 9:53 ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-09-02 10:39 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-09-02 12:42 ` Pavel Tatashin
2020-09-02 13:50 ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-02 14:20 ` Pavel Tatashin
2020-09-03 18:09 ` David Hildenbrand
2020-09-02 11:26 ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-02 12:51 ` Pavel Tatashin
2020-09-02 13:51 ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-02 11:32 ` Michal Hocko
2020-09-02 12:53 ` Pavel Tatashin
2020-09-02 13:52 ` Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CA+CK2bDDToW=Q5RgeWkoN3_rUr3pyWGVb9MraTzM+DM3OZ+tdg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=Kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bharata@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=laoar.shao@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).