From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Kernel Team <kernel-team@fb.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 01/34] mm: memcontrol: use helpers to read page's memcg data
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 20:08:22 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAADnVQJ43nehf_KHeVFp7Ef2Fzu5xuWj4UMUMAbr+4dAE+qSdg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201112194047.ea7c95e2876931fc57ae1cee@linux-foundation.org>
On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 7:40 PM Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 19:25:48 -0800 Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 7:18 PM Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 19:04:56 -0800 Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 04:26:10PM -0800, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > These patches are not intended to be merged through the bpf tree.
> > > > > They are included into the patchset to make bpf selftests pass and for
> > > > > informational purposes.
> > > > > It's written in the cover letter.
> > > > ...
> > > > > Maybe I had to just list their titles in the cover letter. Idk what's
> > > > > the best option for such cross-subsystem dependencies.
> > > >
> > > > We had several situations in the past releases where dependent patches
> > > > were merged into multiple trees. For that to happen cleanly from git pov
> > > > one of the maintainers need to create a stable branch/tag and let other
> > > > maintainers pull that branch into different trees. This way the sha-s
> > > > stay the same and no conflicts arise during the merge window.
> > > > In this case sounds like the first 4 patches are in mm tree already.
> > > > Is there a branch/tag I can pull to get the first 4 into bpf-next?
> > >
> > > Not really, at present. This is largely by design, although it does cause
> > > this problem once or twice a year.
> > >
> > > These four patches:
> > >
> > > mm-memcontrol-use-helpers-to-read-pages-memcg-data.patch
> > > mm-memcontrol-slab-use-helpers-to-access-slab-pages-memcg_data.patch
> > > mm-introduce-page-memcg-flags.patch
> > > mm-convert-page-kmemcg-type-to-a-page-memcg-flag.patch
> > >
> > > are sufficiently reviewed - please pull them into the bpf tree when
> > > convenient. Once they hit linux-next, I'll drop the -mm copies and the
> > > bpf tree maintainers will then be responsible for whether & when they
> > > get upstream.
> >
> > That's certainly an option if they don't depend on other patches in the mm tree.
> > Roman probably knows best ?
>
> That should be OK. They apply and compile ;)
Awesome. Thank you both for confirming.
Will take them as soon as the rest of the set is reviewed.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-13 4:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-12 22:15 [PATCH bpf-next v5 00/34] bpf: switch to memcg-based memory accounting Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 01/34] mm: memcontrol: use helpers to read page's memcg data Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:56 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-11-13 0:26 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-11-13 3:04 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-11-13 3:18 ` Andrew Morton
2020-11-13 3:25 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-11-13 3:40 ` Andrew Morton
2020-11-13 4:08 ` Alexei Starovoitov [this message]
2020-11-13 4:01 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-11-13 14:25 ` Shakeel Butt
2020-11-13 17:18 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 02/34] mm: memcontrol/slab: use helpers to access slab page's memcg_data Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 03/34] mm: introduce page memcg flags Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 04/34] mm: convert page kmemcg type to a page memcg flag Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 05/34] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for bpf progs Roman Gushchin
2020-11-13 17:31 ` Song Liu
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 06/34] bpf: prepare for memcg-based memory accounting for bpf maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-13 17:46 ` Song Liu
2020-11-13 19:40 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-11-13 20:48 ` Song Liu
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 07/34] bpf: " Roman Gushchin
2020-11-13 18:04 ` Song Liu
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 08/34] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for arraymap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 09/34] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for cpumap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 10/34] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for cgroup storage maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 11/34] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for devmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 12/34] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for hashtab maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 13/34] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for lpm_trie maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 14/34] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for bpf ringbuffer Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 15/34] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for bpf local storage maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-13 18:07 ` Song Liu
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 16/34] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for sockmap and sockhash maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 17/34] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for xskmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 18/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for arraymap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 19/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf_struct_ops maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 20/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for cpumap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 21/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for cgroup storage maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 22/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for devmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 23/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for hashtab maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 24/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for lpm_trie maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 25/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for queue_stack_maps maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 26/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for reuseport_array maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 27/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf ringbuffer Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 28/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for sockmap and sockhash maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 29/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for stackmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 30/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for xskmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 31/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf local storage maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-13 18:14 ` Song Liu
2020-11-13 19:33 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-11-13 20:53 ` Song Liu
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 32/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting infra for bpf maps Roman Gushchin
2020-11-13 18:17 ` Song Liu
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 33/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf progs Roman Gushchin
2020-11-12 22:15 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 34/34] bpf: samples: do not touch RLIMIT_MEMLOCK Roman Gushchin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAADnVQJ43nehf_KHeVFp7Ef2Fzu5xuWj4UMUMAbr+4dAE+qSdg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).