From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94EF5C433EF for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 17:28:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 02CBD6B0071; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 13:28:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id EF6406B0074; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 13:28:50 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id D719B6B0075; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 13:28:50 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from relay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0017.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.17]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6D7E6B0071 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 13:28:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin07.hostedemail.com (a10.router.float.18 [10.200.18.1]) by unirelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95FD43474F for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 17:28:50 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 79552124820.07.B8B743B Received: from mail-yb1-f181.google.com (mail-yb1-f181.google.com [209.85.219.181]) by imf14.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A56710004F for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 17:28:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yb1-f181.google.com with SMTP id i39so4246434ybj.9 for ; Tue, 07 Jun 2022 10:28:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=l5Ny4vgpruxYpshg53Ln1+iWeupUNnsukjnUC5UYdOM=; b=BBJq9HytOh8xqxG1MIN1sKtwK93Z7XU0MrDJECq3md+sm3yv1Xd5ltQXskFQhI9cME iqcZ9LmhLZmyYaUghSjx79Y3A9LnqA8BoWAQaDvZPU2hEkMar5IWHpM6xzZg/BYj/SOO pKQokFSBBVEHE1fF81pZ9o0aayaFRGoalN4PoaGghXIx66v8ke+Qu8TkXYoVgIg1Whi6 Y41JGO1oBbH2l//UapjVIss2VHKyFlwqVipz08haTjCsWor+ebXOuLOQN1ZFmGxHwTzk 8Ls8CmFF+wACLiX04kX8dUmr+Drp1mnOCz/GLvyFC6jMMGeARI1pnpk6sT2ZJ5OBPKPU 4Sxg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=l5Ny4vgpruxYpshg53Ln1+iWeupUNnsukjnUC5UYdOM=; b=xc6GVTPekma5B+MZ5u18fLfmLt1d6NJ2nlrqoi/RYasHzCwvQXeeqkQPE9tMemXSIN +Xb4XWi9/FJAYU8mfZbC20iCvRcIp6cIhbV5b5M71VoMd4VnZzch9p9SqxYRnPYoe0ZL 7dJZL8iUME01uBqJyQwpFLF2z+2FulVCSR0zBsBZzqPzCSmX1REMSOy98rEMy7XzSI5R pJ8bdI9CTB2nfny6dKB1AOlM1cX4+MlL6lVl8IfBIt2q0fpfsLqEvTFQx6gCbzoNpiJs YB7MxugzAFRNHWlPhXdwYNY/Z3nfDsYmUCacak6k9z0pbKxl+M0V9sTpydjECYPAiHQA 131A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5331kjHWcECQ+ZAL5g4vmKfyApYP6m4CQjCXDsIhqwzpy9xfQjW+ 9lZrb57ceX4pWni3TkJcN4mDhN1IogDe8E83flxw/Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyCEAFCNtMQmhR5UYxtFrfEzTiCy9SVm2wDE9nWaR1to3z/P80hc9CgpRNlzwlULqatodrIZhEznz2u+MaX8VE= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6902:2d1:b0:64d:de34:b776 with SMTP id w17-20020a05690202d100b0064dde34b776mr30363589ybh.215.1654622929315; Tue, 07 Jun 2022 10:28:49 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220425033934.68551-1-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> <20220425033934.68551-7-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> <20220506153013.e6v4q2qhuhqumfiu@box.shutemov.name> <20220513144515.fx2cvo3rjued3vy5@black.fi.intel.com> <0c545c5f-3540-1441-7a7d-359b6795f43a@amd.com> <19ac7bbc-82f1-8350-8638-163303d682b1@amd.com> In-Reply-To: From: Dionna Amalie Glaze Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2022 10:28:37 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 06/12] x86/boot/compressed: Handle unaccepted memory To: "Gupta, Pankaj" Cc: "Xu, Min M" , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Borislav Petkov , "Gao, Jiaqi" , Michael Roth , Borislav Petkov , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , "Lutomirski, Andy" , "Christopherson,, Sean" , Andrew Morton , "Rodel, Jorg" , Ard Biesheuvel , Andi Kleen , Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan , David Rientjes , Vlastimil Babka , Tom Lendacky , Thomas Gleixner , Peter Zijlstra , Paolo Bonzini , Ingo Molnar , Varad Gautam , Dario Faggioli , "Hansen, Dave" , Mike Rapoport , David Hildenbrand , "x86@kernel.org" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , "linux-coco@lists.linux.dev" , "linux-efi@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspam-User: Authentication-Results: imf14.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=BBJq9Hyt; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=google.com; spf=pass (imf14.hostedemail.com: domain of dionnaglaze@google.com designates 209.85.219.181 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=dionnaglaze@google.com X-Rspamd-Server: rspam10 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4A56710004F X-Stat-Signature: onf7xrdnx6apwrwwu9ejue1s9p4j85n6 X-HE-Tag: 1654622929-45774 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: > free -k parses /proc/meminfo for MemFree and SwapFree in > /proc/meminfo, so it sounds like it should also add in UnacceptedMem. > We'll try that. Thanks. > Testing error on my part. Was using an adaptation of an old patch set. With Brijesh's SEV-SNP support adapted to this version on top of SEV-SNP guest patch series v12, I have no trouble with passing our memtouch test. Reference: https://github.com/deeglaze/amdese-linux/tree/v12unaccepted-v5 -- -Dionna Glaze, PhD (she/her)