From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD9F0C3B194 for ; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 04:12:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8245D217F4 for ; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 04:12:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="LLkolRJJ" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 8245D217F4 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id 1F5856B05EA; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 23:12:55 -0500 (EST) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id 1A65F6B05EB; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 23:12:55 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id 0BBCC6B05EC; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 23:12:55 -0500 (EST) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0024.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.24]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E69C06B05EA for ; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 23:12:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtpin02.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70179501F for ; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 04:12:54 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 76487411868.02.iron38_5387aa804b427 X-HE-Tag: iron38_5387aa804b427 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 3843 Received: from mail-il1-f196.google.com (mail-il1-f196.google.com [209.85.166.196]) by imf45.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 04:12:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-il1-f196.google.com with SMTP id t17so6914705ilm.13 for ; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 20:12:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Gq/vUPgxiC7ymhK3gOaZqEbiZ00K1BjhwYNXIEgf4n8=; b=LLkolRJJlPVXwr74tzRQvftDulWmwUvvE4BTY3lOoQdW/ePbq3G9oetTN1dp7mhWrN UGlmmQSuMzsutFlW3qXIZF73o3UKIQO+PeAojfbxxdrII65JSSBHcmS1kgmRRMu7Yy+2 r+XjvxbaBX+RVKxkw+P4D/lvtMagcKSyhludzNCTkhFC5P9g0UkziPy11DBS2Hx5+tmo l6+iEhGjrH8h10LhtY1Q0q/K06sigmVtGXohPLIYi20u/JFcj77+FHvX6zsPDWdmLxal E0L2DyDeAv/aYLLpO6YfzduCItO35+J+1ij7ew1HLu5u1Yd9jDI7iu+Ys4jZakEmmW9n 7+0A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Gq/vUPgxiC7ymhK3gOaZqEbiZ00K1BjhwYNXIEgf4n8=; b=V/eTR+YnoxZPTrZHz9hLH1hTEoiG11vc7aCAvqPUb9VTB51fgCg4Klt8NOwUlPJbuN GDOOu7A+3/63zxrHPB+poi4MI6s4mrMsNUUnNE8datyOFxdRCyQGsCrOj7AXH2KN6dma DR5Q75GPnV77yNAoPxuWFvppuTk8uKoepprGGkdGz/lihIe/T4RmNAx1imDWe/LkoJTe agglONRYDVqCw75Y5uzGEx4PcbKuSZaWo2oV77SON91nhONnUJha4Wcz//nZeuJ/yqvW OSPanRcGz0uc6egRKZ/yN93K4c0rupTYzMsP/CYoew025onN7p30N85BpcZPdpsUQ1fd iQew== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX/i2m3kVMWIIPSX3JpG14oIXOHVwYprMn3o7xmMcyW1s5rrTJ4 t5gKpD/KbUjnMG+yG65FF3jYzr9eScVqNECEE7w= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw06bOeQTlcsHegd1IX50YN+9LrbIsMztC5QZl8tAsd+2eIrz0U4Iu2wqqeHHqiqSaS+6pd1k72YgkZhgt7Vic= X-Received: by 2002:a92:5855:: with SMTP id m82mr1153192ilb.302.1581653573254; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 20:12:53 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1581401993-20041-1-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> In-Reply-To: <1581401993-20041-1-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> From: Joonsoo Kim Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 13:12:42 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] workingset protection/detection on the anonymous LRU list To: Andrew Morton Cc: Linux Memory Management List , LKML , Johannes Weiner , Michal Hocko , Hugh Dickins , Minchan Kim , Vlastimil Babka , Mel Gorman , kernel-team@lge.com, Joonsoo Kim Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: 2020=EB=85=84 2=EC=9B=94 11=EC=9D=BC (=ED=99=94) =EC=98=A4=ED=9B=84 3:20, <= js1304@gmail.com>=EB=8B=98=EC=9D=B4 =EC=9E=91=EC=84=B1: > > From: Joonsoo Kim > > Hello, > > This patchset implements workingset protection and detection on > the anonymous LRU list. > snip... > > Note that, this result is gotten from v5.1. Although workingset detection > works on v5.1, it doesn't work well on v5.5. It looks like that recent > code change on workingset.c is the reason of this problem. I will > track it soon. Problem is fixed now. It's due to my mistake on the rebase. Replace "mm/workingset: extend the workingset detection for anon LRU" with the patch on the following link. https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAAmzW4NGwvTiE_unACAcSZUH9V3tO0qR=3DZPxi=3Dq9s=3D= zDi53DeQ@mail.gmail.com Thanks.