From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lf0-f70.google.com (mail-lf0-f70.google.com [209.85.215.70]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1EC96B0008 for ; Mon, 14 May 2018 15:24:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-lf0-f70.google.com with SMTP id c24-v6so4450075lfh.10 for ; Mon, 14 May 2018 12:24:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-sor-f41.google.com (mail-sor-f41.google.com. [209.85.220.41]) by mx.google.com with SMTPS id 142-v6sor2266583ljj.43.2018.05.14.12.24.54 for (Google Transport Security); Mon, 14 May 2018 12:24:54 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20180509013358.16399-1-kent.overstreet@gmail.com> From: Kent Overstreet Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 15:24:53 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] Misc block layer patches for bcachefs Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Jens Axboe Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-block , linux-mm , Ingo Molnar Thanks! On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 3:24 PM, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 5/8/18 7:33 PM, Kent Overstreet wrote: >> - Add separately allowed mempools, biosets: bcachefs uses both all over the >> place >> >> - Bit of utility code - bio_copy_data_iter(), zero_fill_bio_iter() >> >> - bio_list_copy_data(), the bi_next check - defensiveness because of a bug I >> had fun chasing down at one point >> >> - add some exports, because bcachefs does dio its own way >> - show whether fua is supported in sysfs, because I don't know of anything that >> exports whether the _block layer_ specifically thinks fua is supported. > > Thanks Kent, applied for 4.18 with the update patch 1. > > -- > Jens Axboe >