From: Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@gmail.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
x86@kernel.org, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
Pavel Tatashin <pavel.tatashin@microsoft.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>, Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>,
Barret Rhoden <brho@google.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/numa: instance all parsed numa node
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2019 12:26:36 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFgQCTvTB_QYANc4TJOUXVzeKhn4TXsgjRLrPuXkRxKjgGC6pA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18D4CC9F-BC2C-4C82-873E-364CD1795EFB@amacapital.net>
On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 1:53 AM Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jul 8, 2019, at 3:35 AM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, 8 Jul 2019, Pingfan Liu wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 3:44 AM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On Fri, 5 Jul 2019, Pingfan Liu wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> I hit a bug on an AMD machine, with kexec -l nr_cpus=4 option. nr_cpus option
> >>>> is used to speed up kdump process, so it is not a rare case.
> >>>
> >>> But fundamentally wrong, really.
> >>>
> >>> The rest of the CPUs are in a half baken state and any broadcast event,
> >>> e.g. MCE or a stray IPI, will result in a undiagnosable crash.
> >> Very appreciate if you can pay more word on it? I tried to figure out
> >> your point, but fail.
> >>
> >> For "a half baked state", I think you concern about LAPIC state, and I
> >> expand this point like the following:
> >
> > It's not only the APIC state. It's the state of the CPUs in general.
> >
> >> For IPI: when capture kernel BSP is up, the rest cpus are still loop
> >> inside crash_nmi_callback(), so there is no way to eject new IPI from
> >> these cpu. Also we disable_local_APIC(), which effectively prevent the
> >> LAPIC from responding to IPI, except NMI/INIT/SIPI, which will not
> >> occur in crash case.
> >
> > Fair enough for the IPI case.
> >
> >> For MCE, I am not sure whether it can broadcast or not between cpus,
> >> but as my understanding, it can not. Then is it a problem?
> >
> > It can and it does.
> >
> > That's the whole point why we bring up all CPUs in the 'nosmt' case and
> > shut the siblings down again after setting CR4.MCE. Actually that's in fact
> > a 'let's hope no MCE hits before that happened' approach, but that's all we
> > can do.
> >
> > If we don't do that then the MCE broadcast can hit a CPU which has some
> > firmware initialized state. The result can be a full system lockup, triple
> > fault etc.
> >
> > So when the MCE hits a CPU which is still in the crashed kernel lala state,
> > then all hell breaks lose.
> >
> >> From another view point, is there any difference between nr_cpus=1 and
> >> nr_cpus> 1 in crashing case? If stray IPI raises issue to nr_cpus>1,
> >> it does for nr_cpus=1.
> >
> > Anything less than the actual number of present CPUs is problematic except
> > you use the 'let's hope nothing happens' approach. We could add an option
> > to stop the bringup at the early online state similar to what we do for
> > 'nosmt'.
> >
> >
>
> How about we change nr_cpus to do that instead so we never have to have this conversation again?
Are you interest in implementing this?
Thanks,
Pingfan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-09 4:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-05 4:15 [PATCH 1/2] x86/numa: carve node online semantics out of alloc_node_data() Pingfan Liu
[not found] ` <1562300143-11671-2-git-send-email-kernelfans@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.21.1907072133310.3648@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
2019-07-08 8:36 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86/numa: instance all parsed numa node Pingfan Liu
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.21.1907081125300.3648@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
2019-07-08 17:53 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-07-09 4:26 ` Pingfan Liu [this message]
2019-07-09 4:16 ` Pingfan Liu
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.21.1907090810490.1961@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
[not found] ` <CAFgQCTui7D6_FQ_v_ijj6k_=+TQzQ3PaGvzxd6p+XEGjQ2S6jw@mail.gmail.com>
2019-07-09 13:34 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-07-10 8:40 ` Pingfan Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAFgQCTvTB_QYANc4TJOUXVzeKhn4TXsgjRLrPuXkRxKjgGC6pA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=kernelfans@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brho@google.com \
--cc=cai@lca.pw \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=pavel.tatashin@microsoft.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).