Re: [PATCH net-next v5 4/5] mvpp2: recycle buffers

[Matteo Croce <mcroce@linux.microsoft.com>]

On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 8:21 PM Russell King (Oracle)
<linux@armlinux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 06:58:45PM +0200, Matteo Croce wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2/mvpp2_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2/mvpp2_main.c
> > index b2259bf1d299..9dceabece56c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2/mvpp2_main.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2/mvpp2_main.c
> > @@ -3847,6 +3847,7 @@ static int mvpp2_rx(struct mvpp2_port *port, struct napi_struct *napi,
> >       struct mvpp2_pcpu_stats ps = {};
> >       enum dma_data_direction dma_dir;
> >       struct bpf_prog *xdp_prog;
> > +     struct xdp_rxq_info *rxqi;
> >       struct xdp_buff xdp;
> >       int rx_received;
> >       int rx_done = 0;
> > @@ -3912,15 +3913,15 @@ static int mvpp2_rx(struct mvpp2_port *port, struct napi_struct *napi,
> >               else
> >                       frag_size = bm_pool->frag_size;
> >
> > +             if (bm_pool->pkt_size == MVPP2_BM_SHORT_PKT_SIZE)
> > +                     rxqi = &rxq->xdp_rxq_short;
> > +             else
> > +                     rxqi = &rxq->xdp_rxq_long;
> >
> > +             if (xdp_prog) {
> > +                     xdp.rxq = rxqi;
> >
> > +                     xdp_init_buff(&xdp, PAGE_SIZE, rxqi);
> >                       xdp_prepare_buff(&xdp, data,
> >                                        MVPP2_MH_SIZE + MVPP2_SKB_HEADROOM,
> >                                        rx_bytes, false);
> > @@ -3964,7 +3965,7 @@ static int mvpp2_rx(struct mvpp2_port *port, struct napi_struct *napi,
> >               }
> >
> >               if (pp)
> > +                     skb_mark_for_recycle(skb, virt_to_page(data), pp);
> >               else
> >                       dma_unmap_single_attrs(dev->dev.parent, dma_addr,
> >                                              bm_pool->buf_size, DMA_FROM_DEVICE,
>
> Looking at the above, which I've only quoted the _resulting_ code after
> your patch above, I don't see why you have moved the
> "bm_pool->pkt_size == MVPP2_BM_SHORT_PKT_SIZE" conditional outside of
> the test for xdp_prog - I don't see rxqi being used except within that
> conditional. Please can you explain the reasoning there?
>

Back in v3, skb_mark_for_recycle() was accepting an xdp_mem_info*, so
I needed rxqi out of that conditional scope to get that pointer.
Now we just need a page_pool*, so I can restore the original chunk.
Nice catch.

Thanks,
-- 
per aspera ad upstream