linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com>
To: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	 Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	 Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	 Chen Huang <chenhuang5@huawei.com>,
	"Bodeddula, Balasubramaniam" <bodeddub@amazon.com>,
	 Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	 Xiongchun duan <duanxiongchun@bytedance.com>,
	fam.zheng@bytedance.com,  Muchun Song <smuchun@gmail.com>,
	Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>,
	 linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	 Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 2/4] mm: hugetlb: replace hugetlb_free_vmemmap_enabled with a static_key
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2021 23:14:56 +1200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGsJ_4zZfemMA9=85sgASacPqaT4OnV7RaYUwtQef=BzEfqW9w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMZfGtWWvDcz+JZtj0k_YZsD4j42cgaoWOCd1o8jArizqBYKgQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 10:31 PM Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 12:55 PM Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 12:08 AM Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > The page_head_if_fake() is used throughout memory management and the
> > > conditional check requires checking a global variable, although the
> > > overhead of this check may be small, it increases when the memory
> > > cache comes under pressure. Also, the global variable will not be
> > > modified after system boot, so it is very appropriate to use static
> > > key machanism.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
> > > ---
> > >  include/linux/hugetlb.h    |  6 +++++-
> > >  include/linux/page-flags.h |  6 ++++--
> > >  mm/hugetlb_vmemmap.c       | 10 +++++-----
> > >  3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/hugetlb.h b/include/linux/hugetlb.h
> > > index f7ca1a3870ea..ee3ddf3d12cf 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/hugetlb.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/hugetlb.h
> > > @@ -1057,7 +1057,11 @@ static inline void set_huge_swap_pte_at(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr
> > >  #endif /* CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE */
> > >
> > >  #ifdef CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE_FREE_VMEMMAP
> > > -extern bool hugetlb_free_vmemmap_enabled;
> > > +DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_MAYBE(CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE_FREE_VMEMMAP_DEFAULT_ON,
> > > +                        hugetlb_free_vmemmap_enabled_key);
> > > +#define hugetlb_free_vmemmap_enabled                                    \
> > > +       static_key_enabled(&hugetlb_free_vmemmap_enabled_key)
> > > +
> > >  #else
> > >  #define hugetlb_free_vmemmap_enabled   false
> > >  #endif
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/page-flags.h b/include/linux/page-flags.h
> > > index 7b1a918ebd43..d68d2cf30d76 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/page-flags.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/page-flags.h
> > > @@ -185,7 +185,8 @@ enum pageflags {
> > >  #ifndef __GENERATING_BOUNDS_H
> > >
> > >  #ifdef CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE_FREE_VMEMMAP
> > > -extern bool hugetlb_free_vmemmap_enabled;
> > > +DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_MAYBE(CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE_FREE_VMEMMAP_DEFAULT_ON,
> > > +                        hugetlb_free_vmemmap_enabled_key);
> > >
> > >  /*
> > >   * If the feature of freeing some vmemmap pages associated with each HugeTLB
> > > @@ -204,7 +205,8 @@ extern bool hugetlb_free_vmemmap_enabled;
> > >   */
> > >  static __always_inline const struct page *page_head_if_fake(const struct page *page)
> > >  {
> > > -       if (!hugetlb_free_vmemmap_enabled)
> > > +       if (!static_branch_maybe(CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE_FREE_VMEMMAP_DEFAULT_ON,
> > > +                                &hugetlb_free_vmemmap_enabled_key))
> >
> > A question bothering me is that we still have hugetlb_free_vmemmap_enabled
> > defined as static_key_enabled(&hugetlb_free_vmemmap_enabled_key).
> > but here you are using static_branch_maybe() with the CONFIG and refer the key
> > directly.
> > Do we only need one of them? Or something is wrong?
> >
>
> Yeah, we only need one. But my consideration is that we
> use static_branch_maybe() for performance sensitive places.
> So I do not change hugetlb_free_vmemmap_enabled
> to static_branch_maybe(), this can reduce some codes
> that need to be updated when the static key is enabled.
> Actually, the user of hugetlb_free_vmemmap_enabled
> is not performance sensitive.

not quite sure if an unified inline API will be better, e.g.

#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT
extern struct static_key_false sched_smt_present;

static __always_inline bool sched_smt_active(void)
{
        return static_branch_likely(&sched_smt_present);
}
#else
static inline bool sched_smt_active(void) { return false; }
#endif

but in your case, CONFIG_HUGETLB_PAGE_FREE_VMEMMAP
is always true in your page_head_if_fake(). Why do we check it
again?

>
> Thanks.

Thanks
barry


  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-18 11:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-17  3:48 [PATCH RESEND v2 0/4] Free the 2nd vmemmap page associated with each HugeTLB page Muchun Song
2021-09-17  3:48 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 1/4] mm: hugetlb: free " Muchun Song
2021-09-18  4:38   ` Barry Song
2021-09-18 10:06     ` Muchun Song
2021-09-21  6:43       ` Muchun Song
2021-09-21 10:22       ` Muchun Song
2021-09-21  0:11         ` Barry Song
2021-09-21 13:46           ` Muchun Song
2021-09-21 20:43             ` Barry Song
2021-09-22  2:38               ` Muchun Song
2021-09-22  7:36                 ` Barry Song
2021-09-17  3:48 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 2/4] mm: hugetlb: replace hugetlb_free_vmemmap_enabled with a static_key Muchun Song
2021-09-18  4:55   ` Barry Song
2021-09-18 10:30     ` Muchun Song
2021-09-18 11:14       ` Barry Song [this message]
2021-09-18 11:47         ` Muchun Song
2021-09-18 12:27           ` Barry Song
2021-09-17  3:48 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 3/4] mm: sparsemem: use page table lock to protect kernel pmd operations Muchun Song
2021-09-18  5:06   ` Barry Song
2021-09-18 10:51     ` Muchun Song
2021-09-18 11:01       ` Barry Song
2021-09-17  3:48 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 4/4] selftests: vm: add a hugetlb test case Muchun Song
2021-09-18  5:20   ` Barry Song
2021-09-20 14:26     ` Muchun Song
2021-09-21  0:28       ` Barry Song
2021-09-21 13:18         ` Muchun Song

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAGsJ_4zZfemMA9=85sgASacPqaT4OnV7RaYUwtQef=BzEfqW9w@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=21cnbao@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bodeddub@amazon.com \
    --cc=chenhuang5@huawei.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=duanxiongchun@bytedance.com \
    --cc=fam.zheng@bytedance.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=smuchun@gmail.com \
    --cc=song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).