From: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>, Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Linux FS-devel Mailing List <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] mm: memcontrol: add per memcg shrinker nr_deferred
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 11:12:22 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHbLzkoSSQ_4aY1cNmJGZyL+r6yO3L41KWHi8ZQnDhFTNi-v_Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201210153356.GE264602@cmpxchg.org>
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 7:36 AM Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 10:27:21AM -0800, Yang Shi wrote:
> > @@ -504,6 +577,34 @@ int memcg_expand_shrinker_maps(int new_id)
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > +int memcg_expand_shrinker_deferred(int new_id)
> > +{
> > + int size, old_size, ret = 0;
> > + struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
> > +
> > + size = (new_id + 1) * sizeof(atomic_long_t);
> > + old_size = memcg_shrinker_deferred_size;
> > + if (size <= old_size)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + mutex_lock(&memcg_shrinker_mutex);
>
> The locking is somewhat confusing. I was wondering why we first read
> memcg_shrinker_deferred_size "locklessly", then change it while
> holding the &memcg_shrinker_mutex.
>
> memcg_shrinker_deferred_size only changes under shrinker_rwsem(write),
> correct? This should be documented in a comment, IMO.
Yes, it is correct.
>
> memcg_shrinker_mutex looks superfluous then. The memcg allocation path
> is the read-side of memcg_shrinker_deferred_size, and so simply needs
> to take shrinker_rwsem(read) to lock out shrinker (de)registration.
I see you point. Yes, it seems shrinker_{maps|deferred} allocation
could be synchronized with shrinker registration by shrinker_rwsem.
memcg_shrinker_mutex is just renamed from memcg_shrinker_map_mutex
which was introduced by shrinker_maps patchset. I'm not quite sure why
this mutex was introduced at the first place, I guess the main purpose
is to *not* exacerbate the contention of shrinker_rwsem?
If that contention is not a concern, we could remove that dedicated mutex.
>
> Also, isn't memcg_shrinker_deferred_size just shrinker_nr_max? And
No, it is variable. It is nr * sizeof(atomit_long_t). The nr is the
current last shrinker ID. If a new shrinker is registered, the nr may
grow.
> memcg_expand_shrinker_deferred() is only called when size >= old_size
> in the first place (because id >= shrinker_nr_max)?
Yes.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-10 19:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-02 18:27 [RFC PATCH 0/9] Make shrinker's nr_deferred memcg aware Yang Shi
2020-12-02 18:27 ` [PATCH 1/9] mm: vmscan: simplify nr_deferred update code Yang Shi
2020-12-03 2:56 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-12-02 18:27 ` [PATCH 2/9] mm: vmscan: use nid from shrink_control for tracepoint Yang Shi
2020-12-03 3:13 ` Xiaqing (A)
2020-12-11 19:20 ` Yang Shi
2020-12-02 18:27 ` [PATCH 3/9] mm: memcontrol: rename memcg_shrinker_map_mutex to memcg_shrinker_mutex Yang Shi
2020-12-02 18:27 ` [PATCH 4/9] mm: vmscan: use a new flag to indicate shrinker is registered Yang Shi
2020-12-03 3:01 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-12-03 4:59 ` Yang Shi
2020-12-03 20:08 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-12-03 22:25 ` Yang Shi
2020-12-04 18:52 ` Johannes Weiner
2020-12-04 21:24 ` Yang Shi
2020-12-02 18:27 ` [PATCH 5/9] mm: memcontrol: add per memcg shrinker nr_deferred Yang Shi
2020-12-03 3:06 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-12-03 4:54 ` Yang Shi
2020-12-03 18:03 ` Yang Shi
2020-12-03 20:07 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-12-03 22:49 ` Yang Shi
2020-12-03 23:30 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-12-04 0:22 ` Yang Shi
2020-12-10 15:33 ` Johannes Weiner
2020-12-10 19:12 ` Yang Shi [this message]
2020-12-11 17:52 ` Yang Shi
2020-12-10 21:59 ` Yang Shi
2020-12-02 18:27 ` [PATCH 6/9] mm: vmscan: use per memcg nr_deferred of shrinker Yang Shi
2020-12-03 3:08 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-12-03 5:01 ` Yang Shi
2020-12-03 11:40 ` Kirill Tkhai
2020-12-08 17:13 ` Yang Shi
2020-12-09 15:41 ` Kirill Tkhai
2020-12-09 17:32 ` Yang Shi
2020-12-10 15:13 ` Johannes Weiner
2020-12-10 15:17 ` Kirill Tkhai
2020-12-15 16:44 ` Johannes Weiner
2020-12-02 18:27 ` [PATCH 7/9] mm: vmscan: don't need allocate shrinker->nr_deferred for memcg aware shrinkers Yang Shi
2020-12-02 18:27 ` [PATCH 8/9] mm: memcontrol: reparent nr_deferred when memcg offline Yang Shi
2020-12-02 18:27 ` [PATCH 9/9] mm: vmscan: shrink deferred objects proportional to priority Yang Shi
2020-12-03 2:52 ` [RFC PATCH 0/9] Make shrinker's nr_deferred memcg aware Roman Gushchin
2020-12-03 17:52 ` Yang Shi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAHbLzkoSSQ_4aY1cNmJGZyL+r6yO3L41KWHi8ZQnDhFTNi-v_Q@mail.gmail.com \
--to=shy828301@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=ktkhai@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).