From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFE99C433EF for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 05:36:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83C436108F for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 05:36:38 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 83C436108F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id E88EB900002; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 01:36:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id E38256B0071; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 01:36:37 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id CFF56900002; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 01:36:37 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0134.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.134]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1DEA6B006C for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 01:36:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin24.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7403F8249980 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 05:36:37 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 78686675634.24.56CF972 Received: from mail-yb1-f170.google.com (mail-yb1-f170.google.com [209.85.219.170]) by imf01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FA88508355D for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 05:36:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yb1-f170.google.com with SMTP id s64so44064050yba.11 for ; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 22:36:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=7XL2OhH3/JP2d1n5i0NoQYVBLyR5b6ih9F8rC7fPaw8=; b=YIz7schr62o25Kk8g7+lX0aqEsOX9ha4KRCurs5t8nYWe3ybb0BGYRyTNxOMDQOt4L gRMaIvi1d5c020EPGi2iB+KhmmRlH0d6ErcqsmawK4hViPXWSHB8THppCf0yRlDWQsbS 1eMwwPcHGB5y/XIJhsmmdMZc+YTZntrOYcrGKVIusunJdjDqMyhxNosruNdKybo6Ghla I5rPA1ih4GOrBL5FL9LswuwUgRYkdHRsI22iY+KhbSsZxVkOzruQfuAcp6IixjL8uPKU 4dC/+SScw5mAcuOp40squ2No5UFu3JEoaMnizIyl/RoGHsoQwZwD7NU0S2kEc+cOqUZh a1wQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=7XL2OhH3/JP2d1n5i0NoQYVBLyR5b6ih9F8rC7fPaw8=; b=oRjzrxgvN1DABDpFeaqVA7BhxsccdOErP0/t90PH7Q5+Yrd4/0+K9M3jlCwwSzIQcj f5rhBy1GDLlHAS3OcsZ7selOWuLJ5qWOKjuXwdS23x2wozyXJ3ZMGDpXkr+W3J985w30 MSoJUNHB3yIYUWJSIcxAzVtkOr4oFqPwdBgsSKxHyUzgetGHa+kCitk9s10rMBMHQvD+ QHxxgAnn9ROPBhCKtfIPQFxrayc8btnnnJPwhiu3rDPhTNlEX0Eri9NDnoQXxvLr5sdy r14tKtblemai/8lz62Yq5hKrh0QBAfELkpbruXWVbK3oRB4SpYCCPk+7frKQrhr3iA1J cNmg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532vIIaVsRKFwIbA2l8cb78cb//CMBMj7ZfcNZC/oWs7S4teC5Zz UMShu8OeYlkSHhHBc9kHyg658Tx3mBEnzOvm+dJAhw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyTsM4JaN/xPnjTpzxxuo73xadaPUNGih6GtuXol8Vc+QjBmhQFZit4fZr7hGyTs8vyfUE4twxwx2HN6kT73h4= X-Received: by 2002:a25:3:: with SMTP id 3mr27812738yba.418.1634016995938; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 22:36:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <202110071111.DF87B4EE3@keescook> <202110081344.FE6A7A82@keescook> In-Reply-To: From: Suren Baghdasaryan Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 22:36:24 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 3/3] mm: add anonymous vma name refcounting To: Johannes Weiner Cc: Michal Hocko , Kees Cook , Pavel Machek , Rasmus Villemoes , David Hildenbrand , John Hubbard , Andrew Morton , Colin Cross , Sumit Semwal , Dave Hansen , Matthew Wilcox , "Kirill A . Shutemov" , Vlastimil Babka , Jonathan Corbet , Al Viro , Randy Dunlap , Kalesh Singh , Peter Xu , rppt@kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , Catalin Marinas , vincenzo.frascino@arm.com, =?UTF-8?B?Q2hpbndlbiBDaGFuZyAo5by16Yym5paHKQ==?= , Axel Rasmussen , Andrea Arcangeli , Jann Horn , apopple@nvidia.com, Yu Zhao , Will Deacon , fenghua.yu@intel.com, thunder.leizhen@huawei.com, Hugh Dickins , feng.tang@intel.com, Jason Gunthorpe , Roman Gushchin , Thomas Gleixner , krisman@collabora.com, Chris Hyser , Peter Collingbourne , "Eric W. Biederman" , Jens Axboe , legion@kernel.org, Rolf Eike Beer , Cyrill Gorcunov , Muchun Song , Viresh Kumar , Thomas Cedeno , sashal@kernel.org, cxfcosmos@gmail.com, LKML , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm , kernel-team , Tim Murray Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Server: rspam02 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 1FA88508355D X-Stat-Signature: wfabknw4qhbr5d1gam1469jeb39n161k Authentication-Results: imf01.hostedemail.com; dkim=pass header.d=google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=YIz7schr; spf=pass (imf01.hostedemail.com: domain of surenb@google.com designates 209.85.219.170 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=surenb@google.com; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=google.com X-HE-Tag: 1634016997-749604 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 8:00 PM Johannes Weiner wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 06:20:25PM -0700, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 6:18 PM Suren Baghdasaryan wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 1:36 AM Michal Hocko wrote: > > > > > > > > On Fri 08-10-21 13:58:01, Kees Cook wrote: > > > > > - Strings for "anon" specifically have no required format (this is good) > > > > > it's informational like the task_struct::comm and can (roughly) > > > > > anything. There's no naming convention for memfds, AF_UNIX, etc. Why > > > > > is one needed here? That seems like a completely unreasonable > > > > > requirement. > > > > > > > > I might be misreading the justification for the feature. Patch 2 is > > > > talking about tools that need to understand memeory usage to make > > > > further actions. Also Suren was suggesting "numbering convetion" as an > > > > argument against. > > > > > > > > So can we get a clear example how is this being used actually? If this > > > > is just to be used to debug by humans than I can see an argument for > > > > human readable form. If this is, however, meant to be used by tools to > > > > make some actions then the argument for strings is much weaker. > > > > > > The simplest usecase is when we notice that a process consumes more > > > memory than usual and we do "cat /proc/$(pidof my_process)/maps" to > > > check which area is contributing to this growth. The names we assign > > > to anonymous areas are descriptive enough for a developer to get an > > > idea where the increased consumption is coming from and how to proceed > > > with their investigation. > > > There are of course cases when tools are involved, but the end-user is > > > always a human and the final report should contain easily > > > understandable data. > > > > > > IIUC, the main argument here is whether the userspace can provide > > > tools to perform the translations between ids and names, with the > > > kernel accepting and reporting ids instead of strings. Technically > > > it's possible, but to be practical that conversion should be fast > > > because we will need to make name->id conversion potentially for each > > > mmap. On the consumer side the performance is not as critical, but the > > > fact that instead of dumping /proc/$pid/maps we will have to parse the > > > file, do id->name conversion and replace all [anon:id] with > > > [anon:name] would be an issue when we do that in bulk, for example > > > when collecting system-wide data for a bugreport. > > Is that something you need to do client-side? Or could the bug tool > upload the userspace-maintained name:ids database alongside the > /proc/pid/maps dump for external processing? You can generate a bugreport and analyze it locally or submit it as an attachment to a bug for further analyzes. Sure, we can attach the id->name conversion table to the bugreport but either way, some tool would have to post-process it to resolve the ids. If we are not analyzing the results immediately then that step can be postponed and I think that's what you mean? If so, then yes, that is correct.