linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Cc: "DRI Development" <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"KVM list" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, "Linux MM" <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"Linux ARM" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:DMA BUFFER SHARING FRAMEWORK"
	<linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
	"Kees Cook" <keescook@chromium.org>,
	"Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"John Hubbard" <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
	"Jérôme Glisse" <jglisse@redhat.com>, "Jan Kara" <jack@suse.cz>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Linux PCI" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@ffwll.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 12/16] PCI: Obey iomem restrictions for procfs mmap
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 16:42:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKMK7uEWe8CaT7zjcZ6dJAKHxtxtqzjVB35fCFviwhcnqksDfw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201021125030.GK36674@ziepe.ca>

On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 2:50 PM Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 10:56:51AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > There's three ways to access PCI BARs from userspace: /dev/mem, sysfs
> > files, and the old proc interface. Two check against
> > iomem_is_exclusive, proc never did. And with CONFIG_IO_STRICT_DEVMEM,
> > this starts to matter, since we don't want random userspace having
> > access to PCI BARs while a driver is loaded and using it.
> >
> > Fix this by adding the same iomem_is_exclusive() check we already have
> > on the sysfs side in pci_mmap_resource().
> >
> > References: 90a545e98126 ("restrict /dev/mem to idle io memory ranges")
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
> > Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
> > Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> > Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> > Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
> > Cc: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>
> > Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> > Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> > Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
> > Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> > Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> > Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.com>
>
> Maybe not for fixing in this series, but this access to
> IORESOURCE_BUSY doesn't have any locking.
>
> The write side holds the resource_lock at least..
>
> >       ret = pci_mmap_page_range(dev, i, vma,
> >                                 fpriv->mmap_state, write_combine);
>
> At this point the vma isn't linked into the address space, so doesn't
> this happen?
>
>      CPU 0                                  CPU1
>  mmap_region()
>    vma = vm_area_alloc
>    proc_bus_pci_mmap
>     iomem_is_exclusive
>     pci_mmap_page_range
>                                             revoke_devmem
>                                              unmap_mapping_range()
>      // vma is not linked to the address space here,
>      // unmap doesn't find it
>   vma_link()
>   !!! The VMA gets mapped with the revoked PTEs
>
> I couldn't find anything that prevents it at least, no mmap_sem on the
> unmap side, just the i_mmap_lock
>
> Not seeing how address space and pre-populating during mmap work
> together? Did I miss locking someplace?
>
> Not something to be fixed for this series, this is clearly an
> improvement, but seems like another problem to tackle?

Uh yes. In drivers/gpu this isn't a problem because we only install
ptes from the vm_ops->fault handler. So no races. And I don't think
you can fix this otherwise through holding locks: mmap_sem we can't
hold because before vma_link we don't even know which mm_struct is
involved, so can't solve the race. Plus this would be worse that
mm_take_all_locks used by mmu notifier. And the address_space
i_mmap_lock is also no good since it's not held during the ->mmap
callback, when we write the ptes. And the resource locks is even less
useful, since we're not going to hold that at vma_link() time for
sure.

Hence delaying the pte writes after the vma_link, which means ->fault
time, looks like the only way to close this gap.

Trouble is I have no idea how to do this cleanly ...
-Daniel



--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch


  reply	other threads:[~2020-10-21 14:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-21  8:56 [PATCH v3 00/16] follow_pfn and other iomap races Daniel Vetter
2020-10-21  8:56 ` [PATCH v3 01/16] drm/exynos: Stop using frame_vector helpers Daniel Vetter
2020-10-21  8:56 ` [PATCH v3 02/16] drm/exynos: Use FOLL_LONGTERM for g2d cmdlists Daniel Vetter
2020-10-21  8:56 ` [PATCH v3 03/16] misc/habana: Stop using frame_vector helpers Daniel Vetter
2020-10-21  8:56 ` [PATCH v3 04/16] misc/habana: Use FOLL_LONGTERM for userptr Daniel Vetter
2020-10-23  9:12   ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-21  8:56 ` [PATCH v3 05/16] mm/frame-vector: Use FOLL_LONGTERM Daniel Vetter
2020-10-21  8:56 ` [PATCH v3 06/16] media: videobuf2: Move frame_vector into media subsystem Daniel Vetter
2020-10-21  8:56 ` [PATCH v3 07/16] mm: Close race in generic_access_phys Daniel Vetter
2020-10-21  8:56 ` [PATCH v3 08/16] s390/pci: Remove races against pte updates Daniel Vetter
2020-10-21  9:37   ` Niklas Schnelle
2020-10-21 13:56     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-21  8:56 ` [PATCH v3 09/16] mm: Add unsafe_follow_pfn Daniel Vetter
2020-10-21  8:56 ` [PATCH v3 10/16] media/videbuf1|2: Mark follow_pfn usage as unsafe Daniel Vetter
2020-10-21  8:56 ` [PATCH v3 11/16] vfio/type1: Mark follow_pfn " Daniel Vetter
2020-10-21  8:56 ` [PATCH v3 12/16] PCI: Obey iomem restrictions for procfs mmap Daniel Vetter
2020-10-21 12:50   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-10-21 14:42     ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2020-10-21 15:13       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-10-21 15:54         ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-21 16:37           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-10-21 19:24             ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-21 23:20               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-10-22  7:00                 ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-22 11:43                   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-10-22 13:04                     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-21  8:56 ` [PATCH v3 13/16] /dev/mem: Only set filp->f_mapping Daniel Vetter
2020-10-21 18:21   ` Dan Williams
2020-10-21  8:56 ` [PATCH v3 14/16] resource: Move devmem revoke code to resource framework Daniel Vetter
2020-10-21 18:59   ` Dan Williams
2020-10-21 19:25     ` Daniel Vetter
2020-10-21  8:56 ` [PATCH v3 15/16] sysfs: Support zapping of binary attr mmaps Daniel Vetter
2020-10-21  8:56 ` [PATCH v3 16/16] PCI: Revoke mappings like devmem Daniel Vetter
2020-10-21 12:51 ` [PATCH v3 00/16] follow_pfn and other iomap races Jason Gunthorpe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAKMK7uEWe8CaT7zjcZ6dJAKHxtxtqzjVB35fCFviwhcnqksDfw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
    --cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH v3 12/16] PCI: Obey iomem restrictions for procfs mmap' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).