From: Martin Fernandez <martin.fernandez@eclypsium.com>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org,
platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com,
ardb@kernel.org, dvhart@infradead.org, andy@infradead.org,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, rafael@kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, daniel.gutson@eclypsium.com,
hughsient@gmail.com, alex.bazhaniuk@eclypsium.com,
alison.schofield@intel.com, keescook@chromium.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 6/6] drivers/node: Show in sysfs node's crypto capabilities
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2022 09:27:42 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKgze5YZF09F3FTwD6kODd2RrWATutcmM5J7-wcLTK32C6aptg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yfyx8s9n+CZ6TPgg@kernel.org>
On 2/4/22, Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 01:43:28PM -0300, Martin Fernandez wrote:
>> +Description:
>> + This value is 1 if all system memory in this node is
>> + marked with EFI_MEMORY_CPU_CRYPTO, indicating that the
>
> It didn't jump at me at previous postings, but other architectures won't
> necessary have EFI_MEMORY_CPU_CRYPTO marking crypto-capable memory.
>
> How about
>
> This value is 1 if all system memory in this node is capable of being
> protected with the CPU's memory cryptographic capabilities. It is 0
> otherwise.
> On EFI architectures with value corresponds to EFI_MEMORY_CPU_CRYPTO.
>
>
Yes, sounds good to me.
Is there other architecture with something similar to this? Or are you
thinking on the possibility of such architecture?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-04 12:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-03 16:43 [PATCH v6 0/6] x86: Show in sysfs if a memory node is able to do encryption Martin Fernandez
2022-02-03 16:43 ` [PATCH v6 1/6] mm/memblock: Tag memblocks with crypto capabilities Martin Fernandez
2022-02-03 18:07 ` Mike Rapoport
2022-02-03 18:24 ` Martin Fernandez
2022-02-07 21:18 ` Kees Cook
2022-02-08 14:39 ` Martin Fernandez
2022-02-03 16:43 ` [PATCH v6 2/6] mm/mmzone: Tag pg_data_t " Martin Fernandez
2022-02-07 21:19 ` Kees Cook
2022-02-03 16:43 ` [PATCH v6 3/6] x86/e820: Refactor range_update and range_remove Martin Fernandez
2022-02-07 21:45 ` Kees Cook
2022-02-08 8:40 ` Mike Rapoport
2022-02-08 21:01 ` Martin Fernandez
2022-02-15 7:10 ` Mike Rapoport
2022-02-15 14:14 ` Martin Fernandez
2022-02-08 21:09 ` Martin Fernandez
2022-03-04 20:32 ` Martin Fernandez
2022-02-08 21:04 ` Daniel Gutson
2022-02-03 16:43 ` [PATCH v6 4/6] x86/e820: Tag e820_entry with crypto capabilities Martin Fernandez
2022-02-07 21:56 ` Kees Cook
2022-02-08 14:46 ` Martin Fernandez
2022-02-03 16:43 ` [PATCH v6 5/6] x86/efi: Tag e820_entries as crypto capable from EFI memmap Martin Fernandez
2022-02-03 16:43 ` [PATCH v6 6/6] drivers/node: Show in sysfs node's crypto capabilities Martin Fernandez
2022-02-04 3:47 ` Limonciello, Mario
2022-02-04 13:21 ` Martin Fernandez
2022-02-04 15:59 ` Tom Lendacky
2022-02-04 16:23 ` Limonciello, Mario
[not found] ` <Yf1UO6jF91o9k4jB@zn.tnic>
2022-02-04 17:12 ` Tom Lendacky
2022-02-04 17:49 ` Limonciello, Mario
[not found] ` <Yf1p0ZjPf9Qaqwtg@zn.tnic>
2022-02-04 18:49 ` Tom Lendacky
2022-02-04 21:49 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-02-07 3:39 ` Kees Cook
2022-02-04 4:56 ` Mike Rapoport
2022-02-04 12:27 ` Martin Fernandez [this message]
2022-02-04 13:37 ` Mike Rapoport
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAKgze5YZF09F3FTwD6kODd2RrWATutcmM5J7-wcLTK32C6aptg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=martin.fernandez@eclypsium.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex.bazhaniuk@eclypsium.com \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=andy@infradead.org \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=daniel.gutson@eclypsium.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=hughsient@gmail.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).