From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lj1-f200.google.com (mail-lj1-f200.google.com [209.85.208.200]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BC526B05F3 for ; Thu, 8 Nov 2018 07:34:36 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail-lj1-f200.google.com with SMTP id 69-v6so5997469ljs.4 for ; Thu, 08 Nov 2018 04:34:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-sor-f65.google.com (mail-sor-f65.google.com. [209.85.220.65]) by mx.google.com with SMTPS id c7sor1126623lff.32.2018.11.08.04.34.34 for (Google Transport Security); Thu, 08 Nov 2018 04:34:34 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1530853846-30215-1-git-send-email-ks77sj@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: From: =?UTF-8?B?6rmA7KKF7ISd?= Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 21:34:24 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] z3fold: fix wrong handling of headless pages Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000003fea1057a2675c5" Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Vitaly Wool Cc: Andrew Morton , Linux-MM , LKML --00000000000003fea1057a2675c5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi Vitaly, thank you for the reply. I agree your a new solution is more comprehensive and drop my patch is simple way. But, I think it's not fair. If my previous patch was not wrong, is (my patch -> your patch) the right way? I'm sorry I sent reply twice. Best regards, Jongseok > On 6/11/2018 4:48 PM, Vitaly Wool wrote: > Hi Jongseok, > thank you for your work, we've now got a more comprehensive solution: > https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/11/5/726 > Would you please confirm that it works for you? Also, would you be >okay with dropping your patch in favor of the new one? > ~Vitaly --00000000000003fea1057a2675c5 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Vitaly= ,
thank you for the reply.=

I agree your a new solution is more comprehensive and= drop my patch is simple way.
But, I = think it's not fair.
If my previou= s patch was not wrong, is (my patch -> your patch) the right way?
<= div style=3D"color:rgb(0,0,0)">
I'= ;m sorry I sent reply twice.
<= br>
Best regards,
Jongseok

<= /div>

> On 6/11/2018 4:48 PM, = Vitaly Wool wrote:
> Hi Jongseok,

> = thank you for your work, we've now got a more comprehensive solution:>=C2=A0https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/11/5/726

> W= ould you please confirm that it works for you? Also, would you be
>ok= ay with dropping your patch in favor of the new one?

> ~Vitaly
--00000000000003fea1057a2675c5--