From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B417BC433E4 for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 17:07:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kanga.kvack.org (kanga.kvack.org [205.233.56.17]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73755208A9 for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 17:07:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="bo+7UCzu" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 73755208A9 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=reject dis=none) header.from=google.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) id E80306B0081; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 13:07:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 40) id E0A036B0082; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 13:07:38 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: int-list-linux-mm@kvack.org Received: by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix, from userid 63042) id CD1F36B0083; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 13:07:38 -0400 (EDT) X-Delivered-To: linux-mm@kvack.org Received: from forelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0232.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.232]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3E616B0081 for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 13:07:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smtpin06.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by forelay05.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 660D0181AEF09 for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 17:07:38 +0000 (UTC) X-FDA: 77171578596.06.food41_3d137da27032 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (10.5.16.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.16.251]) by smtpin06.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 245DE100431AC for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 17:06:58 +0000 (UTC) X-HE-Tag: food41_3d137da27032 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 4117 Received: from mail-lj1-f196.google.com (mail-lj1-f196.google.com [209.85.208.196]) by imf31.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 17:06:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lj1-f196.google.com with SMTP id g6so2882210ljn.11 for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 10:06:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=j6WgqePZAKFwWv7oibyf66OC3S+SA0EwtLkT0KHMn7s=; b=bo+7UCzu3XtlLDsIdFcX5T2SOSSTsIkuEKVjv+td78vJUz4Qxj8E6pMzu0KujU0A8E wEY9X0HcNUH4MKDpEJcRCVekv731AB5t41ds1k6HDNgEAnDfiMuAYEd0JBMBCKkPIAls 1ofwEbhEVneHVJ6n0purqzcbgSFawo2aR5Qj0bawUT6gizMqMxUdTu5Dax0QynHmnjhd hdB/1ctAxAaeD4O9/Pq7Bw19oxiBt6p7riIhI2gRNppDgxaBqie0QR49HWNaHkfr4pZR PmOswhZhm3v8rhV4eoYr9SX2GbowE+xyG+XqtRWsKplLcBdxMd2TZogrYKHaEzvA8E9/ 12yA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=j6WgqePZAKFwWv7oibyf66OC3S+SA0EwtLkT0KHMn7s=; b=AyrcmgLiaYuYVjYhb3vvzTMN62EruOCaMfD6+BXr4OAQ4LzNQIqqVs/3JY1FSblSl5 K4jAOfG7SCDhHduDa4hIAzknX6LeavMl3YPqHffK9UO0Ym5sRdNQiFx//EBscDsjIzax uxpHwiSHfNyw+18DClV9p7btKugkfiTDvm1iQXVdAEv9Kw8DvyjzPcSQ2Us+xXylOfaX cQ6q/hDtvWaElqFDmLN+0TTFQUXBhAlqvPwjjnaCnR47gehQxQ2jj93Md/7kM90/YTxJ 4czsixiJUJ02fThlp2jaUkx9fAw04cLzygim/99vRWvpKp7NjcogDCRf1+WcAXlSZ+qv jlZQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531CaZIooEi4xzanSyMdH5iI6CGBzKE0YrvBK2Xp+pM2W+UvjLNK WeBeL2VLsUlWPmZaPivPYbqvlGxulpx8xxzkAXcsYw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJziUJGXBSB9o6ksa6wt3btAspt3JpWrpRS8ydIXvVTIxvdXw64pBpOlKiXdI5HRmfJyA09t5CJD1wgjuiuMX0o= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9396:: with SMTP id g22mr2214071ljh.446.1597943215596; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 10:06:55 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200528135444.11508-1-schatzberg.dan@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20200528135444.11508-1-schatzberg.dan@gmail.com> From: Shakeel Butt Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 10:06:44 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/4] Charge loop device i/o to issuing cgroup To: Dan Schatzberg Cc: Jens Axboe , Alexander Viro , Jan Kara , Amir Goldstein , Tejun Heo , Li Zefan , Johannes Weiner , Michal Hocko , Vladimir Davydov , Andrew Morton , Hugh Dickins , Roman Gushchin , Chris Down , Yang Shi , Thomas Gleixner , "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" , Ingo Molnar , Mathieu Desnoyers , Andrea Arcangeli , "open list:BLOCK LAYER" , open list , "open list:FILESYSTEMS (VFS and infrastructure)" , "open list:CONTROL GROUP (CGROUP)" , "open list:CONTROL GROUP - MEMORY RESOURCE CONTROLLER (MEMCG)" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 245DE100431AC X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 100.00] X-Rspamd-Server: rspam02 X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.4 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: owner-majordomo@kvack.org List-ID: On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 6:55 AM Dan Schatzberg wrote: > > Much of the discussion about this has died down. There's been a > concern raised that we could generalize infrastructure across loop, > md, etc. This may be possible, in the future, but it isn't clear to me > how this would look like. I'm inclined to fix the existing issue with > loop devices now (this is a problem we hit at FB) and address > consolidation with other cases if and when those need to be addressed. > What's the status of this series?